Title:
1Performance of MODIS Semi-Analytic Ocean Color
Algorithms Chlorophyll a, Absorption
Coefficients, and Absorbed Radiation by
Phytoplanktonby Kendall L. Carder
- Absorption coefficients for phytoplankton, af(?),
colored dissolved organic matter (CDOM) or
gelbstoff, ag(?), and total, at(?) - Chlorophyll a (Chlor_a_3) in the presence of CDOM
- Instantaneous photosynthetically active radiation
for fluorescence, IPAR - Absorbed radiation by phytoplankton for
fluorescence, ARP - Parameter adjustment for bio-optical domains
comparing SST with NDTs - Near-term focus is on the significantly improved
performance of Chlor_a_3 at high latitudes
2Absorption spectra for water, CDOM, and
phytoplankton
3a? (443)/a? (675) versus a? (675) from Bering Sea
(MF0796) and Antarctic Polar Frontal Zone
(REV9802) are compared with high-light tropical
and subtropical data (dashed line)
4Surface map of (a) Temperature (oC) (b) Nitrate
concentration (µM l-1) (c) chla (mg m-3) and
(d) a? (443)/a? (675) for the California
upwelling region (Cal9704) in April 1997.
5Blending scheme to transition between fully
packaged and unpackaged pigment parameterization
for waters with SST between NDT-1 and NDT4
degrees C NDT map from D. Kamekowski
6Performance of new blending scheme for waters of
the Southern California Bight transitioning
between cold, nutrient-rich upwelled waters and
offshore, nutrient-poor waters.
7Comparison between Chlor_a_3 SA and OC4v4
algorithms for Chlorophyll a for the Southern
California Bight
8Chlor_a_3 applied to the Arctic region (a).
Quantile plot (b) shows no bias. CZCS algorithm,
dashed line in (d), shows bias due to package
effect
9Chlor_a_3 SA algorithm performance versus OC4v4
for Antarctic based on 971 field data points.
Note the large negative bias in the OC4v4
quantile plot
10Chlor_a_3 semi-analytical retrievals of
chlorophyll a for November 2000
11Chlor_a_2 empirical (OC4 surrogate) retrievals of
chlorophyll a for November 2000
12Semi-analytical retrieval of absorption by CDOM
or gelbstoff for November 2000Note the high
values in northern (river-rich) hemisphere
13Global histograms of chlorophyll a retrievals for
November 2000 using a) empirical Chlor_a_2 and b)
semi-analytic Chlor_a_3 algorithms. Mean values
are 0.215 and 0.325 mg m-3, respectively. Gregg
Conkright (2002)autumn mean 0.31 mg m-3 .
14(No Transcript)
15Match-up Data Sets (preliminary) Provided by the
SIMBIOS for Non-Shallow Depths
- Chlor_a_3 Chlor_a_2
- Slope 0.97 0.79
- Intercept -.0045 -0.012
- r2 0.79 0.79
- Bias 0.009 -0.055
- RMS error 0.173 0.190
- Linear error ?49.1 ? 55.0
16Striping in the Chlor_a_3 products for the
western Gulf of Mexico due to stripes in the Lw
values (left) raw and (right) filtered
17Raw and filtered data from scene center. Lines 0,
20, 40, were each averaged horizontally and
then averaged together. Similar steps were taken
with Lines 1, 21, 41, etc. until a 20-line
pattern due to striping was acquired
18Noise pattern due to vertical striping from left
part of GOM scene (solid). A filter was made by
ratioing the mean to each line element and
applying to each appropriate line by multiplying.
Dashed line is the result. Over-compensation
occurred since striping was worse in the lower
left than in the upper right portions of original
scene.
19Change in horizontal variance was about 1 as a
result of applying the vertical filter. Note
solid and dashed lines represent unfiltered and
filtered data.
20Conclusions
- Chlor_a_3 algorithm performance has improved for
high-latitude and upwelling scenes with little or
no bias. - SeaWiFS OC-4 algorithm performance in the
Southern Ocean for field radiance is biased low
by gt40 Chlor_a_2 global mean for November 2000
was 0.215 mg/m3, while Chlor_a_3 value was 0.32
mg/m3. Gregg Conkright (2002) mean global
autumn value was 0.305 mg/m3. - Global ocean primary production calculated with
the MODIS Terra Chlor_a_3 algorithm are expected
to show an increase over SeaWiFS-based values of
about 29 for austral spring data. - Preliminary non-shallow match-up field data for
Terra Chlor_a_3 and Chlor_a_2 results show errors
of 49 and 55, respectively, with 1 and 13.5
linear biases, respectively, with most difference
occurring for winter California Current data. - A de-striping approach appears promising if
smaller sub-scenes are used in the filter
generation and application