6: Consciousness - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

6: Consciousness

Description:

Every thought or state of mind that one has. Constant change between successive states ... 'Prelude ... Ant Fugue' from Hofstadter, D. R. (1979) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:32
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: psycholog4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 6: Consciousness


1
6 Consciousness
  • Outline
  • Basic issues
  • Easy and hard problems
  • Philosophical positions
  • Neuroscientific Theory
  • Crick Koch and the binding problem
  • Philosophical Theories
  • Searle
  • Chalmers
  • The Zombie Argument
  • Dennett
  • A view from psychology
  • Learning Outcomes

2
What is consciousness?
  • We all know dont we?
  • James (1910)
  • Every thought or state of mind that one has
  • Constant change between successive states
  • Consciousness appears to us as a continuous flow
    or stream

3
The asymmetry of consciousness
  • Different mode of access to facts of
  • Your own consciousness
  • 1st person perspective
  • Other peoples consciousness
  • 3rd person perspective
  • We know the phenomenology of conscious experience
    the qualia
  • Cannot access someone elses first-person
    perspective
  • Out of reach of scientific methods

4
What is it like to be a bat?
  • Subjective vs objective concepts
  • what is it like? vs physical make-up
  • We have no conception of the subjective side
  • We dont know what it is like to be a bat
  • There is something about experience that isnt
    covered by scientific description

5
The problem is
  • How does subjective consciousness fit into the
    objective world?
  • How does it relate to the physical properties of
    the brain?
  • NB 2 types of consciousness
  • Access consciousness
  • Rational control of behaviour
  • Reasoning, action, speech
  • Phenomenal consciousness
  • Experiential states, qualia

6
Easy and Hard problems
  • Easy problem
  • Objective study of the brain
  • Causal roles played by psychological states
  • How are these roles implemented in the brain?
  • Essentially explanation of cognitive functions
  • Chalmers (1995)
  • Ability to discriminate, react to external
    stimuli, integrate information, report mental
    states, attention
  • Susceptible to the methodology of cognitive
    psychology
  • The easy problem is quite hard.
  • But the hard problem is even harder!

7
Easy and Hard problems
  • Hard problem
  • Phenomenal consciousness
  • Where do feelings come from
  • We can talk about the function of pain and the
    mental states involved, but why does it hurt?
  • Functionalist problem
  • We do not know what its function is
  • Materialist problem
  • We do not know what it is made of
  • Experimental problem
  • We cannot measure it directly

8
3 viewpoints
  • Dualist
  • Conscious experience distinct from brain activity
  • Property dualism (e.g. Chalmers)
  • One substance, 2 properties
  • Physical properties
  • Conscious properties
  • Materialist
  • Unity of conscious experience and the brain
  • Conscious states are physical brain states

9
3 viewpoints
  • Mysterian
  • Consciousness is a complete mystery
  • Colin McGinn (1989)
  • how can technicolour phenomenology arise from
    soggy grey matter
  • Awareness of colours cannot be the same thing as
    neurons firing
  • Thomas Nagel
  • We lack any conception of how mind and brain can
    be identical
  • But do not want a dualism
  • Non-material conscious states lack causal power
    over matter

10
We need a theory!
  • Which bits of the brain (which processes) are
    associated with consciousness?
  • Obviously many processes do not yield conscious
    experience (e.g. hormone production, regulation
    of breathing)
  • Do similar processes occur in other animals?
  • Search for a theory independent of philosophical
    position.

11
The Binding problem
  • Integrated conscious experiences
  • we experience everything as one event, e.g.
    sound, sight, our feelings and reactions
  • But where is this theatre of the mind?
  • Different sensations processed in different parts
    of the brain
  • e.g. colour and shape are processed in different
    parts of the brain
  • No nerve pathway system connecting these areas to
    a central place

12
Crick Koch (1990) Neural Oscillations
  • When we see objects, different features are
    processed in different areas of the visual cortex
  • 2 objects cubic green box and cylindrical red
    hat
  • Shape area cubic and cylindrical
  • Colour area green and red
  • Categorisation area box and hat
  • Q. How do we bind cubic, green and box?
  • A. Neural Oscillations
  • Aspects of one object all associated with brain
    waves at the same frequency (35-75 Hz)
  • Oscillations are neural correlate of visual
    consciousness

13
Criticisms of Crick Koch
  • Oscillations may be neural correlates of
    experience, but this doesn't explain why they
    give rise to experience.
  • C K dont discriminate between between A- and
    P-consciousness. They are only addressing
    A-consciousness (or the easy problem).
  • There is an explanatory gap
  • How does neural oscillation give rise to
    consciousness?

14
Searle biological naturalism
  • Brain processes cause consciousness
  • Processes cannot properly simulated
    computationally.
  • Humans have semantics (and computer programs
    dont)
  • This difference is because humans have
    consciousness
  • Need to be able to interpret semantics
  • Need to have consciousness to interpret

15
Chalmers
  • Qualia cannot arise from information processing
  • The brain is an information processing device
  • Therefore, consciousness must be a phenomena that
    attaches itself to information processing
    mechanisms
  • So - consciousness has its own existence.
  • We require a new fundamental property (alongside
    mass, space-time etc.)

16
The Zombie argument
  • Zombies
  • Physically identical to us
  • Behaviourally indistinguishable from us
  • But they have no conscious experience
  • Argument against materialism
  • Do physical processes necessitate consciousness?
  • If P necessitates C, we could not imagine a world
    containing P unless it also contains C
  • A zombie world is imaginable
  • So consciousness cannot be necessitated by any
    physical processes
  • Consciousness cannot be explained in purely
    physical terms.

17
The Zombie argument
  • Dennetts response
  • Zombies are impossible
  • any being exhibiting sufficiently fine-grained
    behaviour and functionality of a conscious being
    WOULD BE a conscious being

18
Dennett Multiple Drafts Model
  • Functionalist - the hardware doesnt matter
  • There is no stream of consciousness
  • No theatre of the mind
  • Instead, multiple specialist circuits
  • Consciousness arises from processing information
    in a certain way

19
Computation and consciousness
  • Strong AI (Dennett)
  • Consciousness consists entirely of computational
    processes.
  • Weak AI.
  • Brain processes cause consciousness
  • Processes can all be simulated on a computer.
  • Computational simulation will not be conscious.
  • Non-Computational Naturalism (Searle)
  • Brain processes cause consciousness
  • Processes cannot properly simulated
    computationally.
  • Non-Naturalism (Chalmers)
  • Consciousness cannot be explained scientifically
    (computationally or otherwise).

20
Problems
  • How can any theory of brain structure/function
    account for phenomenal feel?
  • But
  • Is there really anything to explain?
  • Is there anything its like to be a bat?
  • Do qualia exist?
  • Consciousness is a fascinating but elusive
    phenomenon it is impossible to specify what it
    is, what it does, or why it evolved. Nothing
    worth reading has been written about it.
    (Sutherland, 1989).

21
An alternative viewpoint (OHara Scutt, 1996)
  • We should ignore the hard problem
  • The easy problem is a promising route to follow
  • Pragmatic argument
  • We know how to address the easy problems
  • Context argument
  • Understanding the easy problems will inform out
    understanding of the nature of the hard problem
  • Epistemological argument
  • We wont recognise a successful theory of the
    hard problem until we have a better understanding
    of what consciousness is

22
Learning Outcomes
  • Understand the basic issues in the study of
    consciousness and the ways in which these
    problems have been addressed by philosophers,
    neuroscientists and psychologists.

23
Reading
  • For next week, read
  • Prelude Ant Fugue from Hofstadter, D. R.
    (1979). Gödel, Escher, Bach an eternal golden
    braid. London Penguin.
  • Further Reading
  • See lecture webpage or .pdf handout
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com