Title: The Future of Democracy in Europe
1The Future of Democracy in Europe
- e-Democracy
- From theory to practice
www.access2democracy.org
2Why e-Democracy?
- What is the situation Today
- ?Abstention of citizens from the political
process to the extend of forsaking their
dominant democratic right Voting
! - ? Democratic deficit even in established
democracies - (not yet readily apparent to all citizens)
- ? Legitimacy Accountability at stake
- Citizens indifference, disengagement, mistrust
- a strong feeling of being left-out
3Why e-Democracy?
- Globalization
- ? Issues of a global nature which cannot be dealt
with effectively at the level of National
governments - ? Global governance institutions not adapted to
their new role - not accountable to citizens
affected by their policies a reform debate has
started (e.g. UN) - ? Interconnectedness on all fronts except
citizens - ? Global problems need Global solutions to
formulate Global policies and take Global action
4Why e-Democracy?
-
- Communication a prerequisite for Democracy
- ? ICTs can offer the means for transnational
communication, collaboration and deliberation - ?A historic opportunity to exploit this,
promoting the emergence of a participatory and
deliberative democracy engaging citizens and the
civil society in its workings. - Local National - Global level
5What is - what is not
- ?Its not - About technology
- - An e-government service
- - Just about e-voting
- - Push-button democracy
- - An alternative democracy
- - A panacea
- ? It is -About consultation deliberation
- - About right of access and
accountability - - About peoples voices being heard
respected.
e-democracy is about Democracy
6e-voting deliberation
- Means for access
- Quality depth of information
- Friendly interface respect for citizens
- Deliberation consultation
- e-voting
7Threats to e-democracy
- ? Digital divide among nations - among citizens
- ? Concentration of Technology (developed nations,
corporate entities) - ? Inertia lack of adaptability from bureaucracy
- administrative structures
- ? Credibility Due to technological, commercial,
political malpractice - e-Democracy is still in its infancy real
experiments are crucial for the development of
best practices early-on
8-
- A 21st century
- international organization
- for e-democracy
9 A Global Perspective
Our Mission access2democracy aims to promote the
principles and practice of participatory
e-democracy within the global arena. Hence we aim
to enhance democratic values and institutions and
citizens access to decision-making processes.
Our Honorary Board Maria Livanos-Cattaui SG,
International Chamber of Commerce Lawrence
Lessig Prof of Law at Stanford Law School, Chair
of the Creative Commons Kumi Naidoo SG CEO of
CIVICUS Nicholas Negroponte MIT Media
Lab George A. Papandreou Leader of the
Opposition, Greece - former MFA Bill Richardson
Governor of New Mexico US, former U.S.
Ambassador to the U.N. Amartya Sen Nobel
Laureate, Lamont University Prof. Emeritus at
Harvard University
10- Experiments in e-Democracy
11Online Global Poll on Environment
- ?World Summit for Sustainable Development
- Johannesburg 2002
- ?The first Online Global Poll on the Environment
and Sustainable Development issues - ?The first global eDemocracy project under the
auspices of a Global Governance Institution - UN.
12Project ID Card
13e-Vote Vote for the EU YOU Want
- ?Greek Presidency of the European Union in 2003
(initiative of MFA) - ? Probably the most successful eDemocracy
experiment to date gt 175.000 participants - ? The first large scale eDemocracy experiment
initiated by policy makers and linked to the
decision making bodies
14The Web Site
15Project ID Card
16Novel aspects
- ? Direct feed to policy debates
- ?Sensitive issues not shied away (e.g. Iraq)
- ? First attempt at analyzing e-voices (based on
frequency of word-usage, a Google-type indexing
mechanism) - ? Extensive pan-European media partnership and
civil society outreach campaign (500 European
and national NGOs, schools, universities, trade
associations, think tanks, political parties,
interest groups, and local/regional/national
governments contacted to drive public
participation)
17e-Voices Cyprus
- ? An e-Democracy experiment in a Deep Rooted
Conflict Area - ? Objective Application of e-Democracy platforms
to create neutral and effective channels of
communication through an open dialogue on vital
issues of mutual interest to Greek Cypriots and
Turkish Cypriots
18The Web Site
19Project ID Card
20Major Lessons Learned
- ? Legitimacy Without political commitment and
active involvement of - policy makers any eDemocracy project loses its
potential impact - towards greater citizen engagement.
- ? Ensure citizens access to accessible
information (avoid jargon etc - which only cloud good intentions). We need
educated and informed - citizens
- ? Build sound technological and conceptual
platforms. - Accessibility, security, privacy are musts, not
bonuses or add-ons - ? Adequate resources access to expertise is
paramount Human, - Financial, Technological
- ? Sound awareness campaigns.
- ? Merge on-line with off-line tools and
communications
21The road ahead Suggestions
- ? Be proactive
- e-Democracy should not be exclusively bonded
with the PC and the Internet We have to keep
looking at highest penetration mediums and future
convergence of technologies. - ? Pooling of resources
- International cooperation for sharing of
ideas, practices and resources Duplication of
effort will hinder success. - A consensus on best practices will benefit
all involved. - ?Extroversion
- Talk and especially listen to the citizens.
They know
22The case for e-democracy
- The Internet can be used by citizens to watch
their - governments - rather than by governments to watch
their - citizens Prof. Manuel Castells
- e-democracy can help enhance
- a culture of democracy.
23Why (e)-Democracy?
- Tell me and Ill forget
- Show me and Ill remember
- Involve me and Ill understand
-
- (Old Chinese proverb)
www.access2democracy.org
24- Visit our site
- www.access2democracy.org
- Contact us access_at_access2democracy.org