Title: Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine For Osteoarthritis
1Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine For
Osteoarthritis
Farshid Guilak, Ph.D. Departments of Surgery,
Biomedical Engineering, and Mechanical
Engineering Materials Science Duke University
Medical Center
2Tissue Engineering The Oversimplified Paradigm
- Cells
- Biomaterial template
- Growth factors
3Tissue Engineering The Emerging Paradigm
- Cell isolation
- Cell selection and expansion in culture
- Genetic manipulation of cells
- Biomaterial template
- Multiple cell and tissue types, innervation,
vascularization - Growth factors and soluble mediators
- Biophysical stimulation in bioreactors
- Packaging, shipping, storage
- Host disease state, inflammation, co-morbidities
- Surgical Implantation and integration
- Rehabilitation
- Regulatory
- Marketing and sales
growing list
4Challenges in Treating Cartilage Defects
- Lack of cell source cell harvest damages native
tissues - Inability to restore original structure and
congruity (40 of ACIs show hypertrophy) - Cartilage defect market is small
- Lack of adhesion between new repair cartilage and
original tissue - Most scaffolds do not possess adequate mechanical
properties for early load-bearing - Long FDA cycle for new materials
5Challenges in Treating Cartilage Defects
6Sites of Stem Cells in the AdultLearning from
Natures Mistakes
- Bone marrow
- Hematopoietic
- Mesenchymal
- Muscle
- Bone
- Skin
- Cartilage
- Brain
- Fat
7Are these Cells Really Stem Cells?- Assumptions
in the Definition -
- Self-renew
- Give rise to specialized cell(s)
- Assumptions
- Within the body
- Physiologic conditions and purpose
- Renew indefinitely (?)
- In tissue engineering, we are allowed to violate
these assumption.
8Isolation of Adipose Stem Cells
Adipose tissue
Collagenase, centrifugation
Stromal-vascular cells
Primary adipocytes
Selective culture
(floaters)
Other cells
Adipose Stem Cells
1mm
1mm
9Adipose-Derived Adult Stromal (ADAS) Cells
Subcutaneous Fat
Adipose-derived Adult Stromal Cells
Halvorsen et al, 2002, Erickson et al, 2002,
Wickham et al, 2002, Safford et al, 2002
10ADAS Cell Surface Phenotype
- Positive Markers CD9, CD10, CD13, CD29, CD34,
CD44, CD49, CD54, CD55, CD59, CD90, CD105, CD106,
CD146, CD166, HLA-ABC - Negative Markers CD11b, CD14, CD18, CD31, CD45,
CD50, CD62e, Stro1, HLA-DR
Gronthos et al., J. Cell. Physiol., 2001 Wickham
et al., CORR, 2003
11Adipose Stem CellsAggrecan Expression
Estes et al., 2006
p lt 0.0005 relative to all other groups
12Adipose Stem CellsCollagen X Expression
100
10
Fold Difference vs. Day 0 /- Sp
1
TGF-ß1
TGF-ß3
DEX TGF-ß1
BMP-6
Base Medium
Day 0 Control
TGF-ß1 IGF-1
TGF-ß1 IGF-1
BMP-6
0.1
p lt 0.0005 relative to all other groups p lt
0.05 relative to Day 0 Control p lt 0.05
relative to Base Medium at Day 7
Estes et al., 2006
13Scaffold MaterialsEffects on Morphology and
Phenotype
10 mm
Gelatin Sponge
2 Agarose
2 Sodium Alginate
Awad et al., 2003
14Tissue Biomechanical Function
- Sub-failure properties
- Inhomogeneous (properties vary with site)
- Anisotropic (properties vary with direction)
- Viscoelastic (behavior is time-dependent,
biphasic) - Nonlinear (stress-strain curve is not linear)
- Tribological properties (friction, wear)
- Transport properties (diffusion, convection)
- Failure Properties
- Yield and ultimate stress, fatigue properties
- Structural Properties
- Congruence, surface roughness, size
15What Mechanical Properties are Necessary?
Huang et al., 2005
16Mechanical Properties of Scaffolds
- Gels
- Conducive to chondrogenesis
- Okay in compression, weaker in tension
- Nonwoven fibrous polymers
- Good in tension
- Anisotropy and inhomogeneity are difficult to
control - Composite materials
- Combinations of dissimilar materials
- Fibers, gel, etc.
17Developing 3D Woven Scaffolds
- Stacked 2D layers
- 3D Woven
Moutos et al, Nature Materials, 2007
18(No Transcript)
193-D Woven Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering
- 400 individual fiber bundles
- 50-100 µm diam.
- Vacuum infiltration of gel
- 30-50 void fraction
203-D Woven Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering
Freed, Moutos, and Guilak
21Mechanical Properties of Composite Matrices
PGA-Agarose
22Tissue Engineering for Osteoarthritis
Liposuction to acquire autologous stem cells
Isolate cells
Mold and prepare 3D scaffold
Culture in bioreactor (?)
Surgical implantation
www.steaman-hawkins.com
Seed cells in 3D Woven fiber scaffold
23Challenges
- Tissue engineered repair must often overcome an
underlying disease state - how do we predict
success or patient variability? - Commercial success and scientific success are
different issues and may depend on the choice of
a target - Bridge the gap between stem cell biologists and
tissue engineers - Scale of the problem is larger than we are used
to dealing with in our field (but not
unprecedented)
24Systems-Based Approaches
- Research or design questions that are too complex
for one investigator or team to address alone - Require understanding the structure-function,
biology, and regulation of multiple components,
different disciplines - Require multiple, interacting, interdisciplinary
teams (ERCs, industry)
25The Crystal Ball
- Immunologically silent cell for allogeneic
transplantation - Methods for cryopreservation (more off-the-shelf
products) - Biologically based joint replacement
- Cellular and acellular therapies for arthritis
26Orthopaedic Bioengineering Lab
Staff Robert Nielsen, B.S. Steve Johnson,
LATG Bridgette Furman, B.S. Mimi Phan,
B.S. Elaine Campbell, M.S.
Post-docs and faculty Andrea Clark, Ph.D. Catrin
Davies, Ph.D. Eric Darling, Ph.D. Beverley
Fermor, Ph.D. Tim Griffin, Ph.D. Amy Mcnulty,
Ph.D. Sharon Lubkin, Ph.D. Graduate
Students Bryce Davis, B.S. Susan Christensen,
B.S. Brad Estes, M.S. John Finan, M.S. Will
Garrigues, B.S. Holly Leddy, M.S. Frank Moutos,
M.S.
Undergraduate Students Becca Wilusz Chelsea
He Dennis Cattel Johannah Sanchez-Adams Melanie
Kolkin
Medical Students Ben Ward, B.S.
27Acknowledgments
Collaborators Jeffrey Gimble, M.D., Ph.D. Lori
Setton, Ph.D. Virginia Kraus, M.D., Ph.D. Lisa
Freed, M.D., Ph.D. Tad Vail, M.D. Brice Weinberg,
M.D. Ashutosh Chilkoti, Ph.D.
Funding National Institutes of Health T32
EB01630 VA Research Service National Institutes
of Health P01 AR50245 NCBC National Institutes of
Health R01 AG15768 NASA National Institutes of
Health R01 AR48182 NSF National Institutes of
Health R21 AR49294 Arthritis Foundation GlaxoSmith
Kline, Inc.