Surviving in a hostile world - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Surviving in a hostile world

Description:

Surviving in a hostile world. Delivering inherently secure. communications. Lance Gaines. Senior VP Engineering, Vadium Technology Inc. Defining Secure Protocols? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:34
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: openg
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Surviving in a hostile world


1
Surviving in a hostile world
  • Delivering inherently securecommunications
  • Lance GainesSenior VP Engineering, Vadium
    Technology Inc.

2
Defining Secure Protocols?
  • SSH, Kerberos, HTTPS, SMTP/TLS etc.
  • What makes them Secure?
  • Most use PKI for Key Exchange
  • Secure only because of time it takes to break
  • Whatever data is sent is secure because the
    Protocol is secure?

3
Time to break?
  • How long is reasonable?
  • Used to be consistent
  • Moores Law
  • We live in exponential times
  • The reality of Quantum Computers
  • If strong cryptography is considered a munition
    and subject to ITAR restrictions, then what will
    a 1024 qubit quantum computer be classified as?
    It will be a Weapon of Mass Destruction.
  • Steven Lutz Security Lecturer, President of
    WaySecure

4
Fast Computers are Here!
  • February 9, 2007 D-Wave Systems, Inc.
  • Announce 16 Qubit Working Quantum Computer (QC)
  • February 9, 2007 Intel
  • Announces 80 Core Parallel Processor
  • February 13, 2007 D-Wave Systems Inc.
  • Demonstrates 16 Qubit Quantum Computer at Museum
    of Computer History in San Francisco
  • February 15, 2007 D- Wave Systems Inc.
  • Announces product release roadmap
  • Commercially Available 32 Qubit QC Q4-2007
  • Commercially Available 512 Qubit QC Q1-2008
  • Commercially Available 1,024 Qubit QC Q3-2008

5
Quantum Computers are Here!
  • One field that will be revolutionized is
    cryptography. All, or nearly all, existing
    cryptographic systems will be rendered insecure,
    and even retrospectively insecure, in that
    messages sent today, if somebody keeps them, will
    be possible to decipher ... with a quantum
    computer as soon as one is built.
  • father of quantum computing, David Deutsch
    Theoretical Physicist, Oxford University
    http//www.wired.com/news/technology/0,72734-0.ht
    ml?twwn_index_1

6
Who Cares?
  • In the world of quantum computing and
    encryption, the question of which will come
    first, quantum computing or quantum encryption,
    is very important. In fact, it is vital. If
    quantum computing comes first, chaos will reign,
    since most of security systems installed by the
    world's vital institutions, including banking,
    commerce and government, have come to depend on
    current encryption methods -- which would
    instantly become archaic.
  • Tim McDonald
  • Quantum Computing Puts Encrypted Messages at Risk
    Newsfactor.com

7
There are over 106 million registered user of
MySpace (as of September 2006) If MySpace were
a country, it would be the 11th largest in the
world (between Japan and Mexico)
8
There are over 2.7 billion searches performed on
Google each month.
9
The number of text messages sent and received
every day exceeds the population of the planet.
10
It is estimated that 1.5 exabytes (1.5 x 1018) of
unique new information will be generated
worldwide this year.Thats estimated to be
more than in the previous 5,000 years.
11
The amount of new technical information is
doubling every 2 years.It is predicted to
double every 72 hours by 2010.
12
Third-generation fiber optics that push 10
trillion bits per second are being
deployedThats 1,900 CDs, or 150 million
simultaneous phone calls, every second.
13
  • Predictions are that by 2013 a Supercomputer will
    be built that exceeds the computation capability
    of the human brain.
  • Predictions are that by 2049 a 1,000 computer
    will exceed the computational capabilities of
    thehuman race.

14
What does all this mean to Delivering Inherently
Secure Protocols?
15
Act not React
  • No Heads in Sand
  • Protocols that are Secure which are based upon
    PKI (asymmetric cryptography) are broken
  • Focus on what needs to be protected
  • The Information is the crown jewels
  • Make the Information network agnostic
  • Quantum Encryption
  • Secure distribution of OTP (One Time Pad) keys
  • Coming soon but not before QCs
  • May be broken already
  • Can use OTP now before Quantum Encryption

16
One Time Pad
  • Been around since 1917 and still unbroken
  • Hard to manage?
  • Dense storage
  • And PKI is so easy to manage?
  • Cant deploy?
  • We deploy physical things all the time Laptops
    etc
  • The only inherently secure cipher
  • Protocol Agnostic
  • Protects Data in motion or at rest
  • Strong authentication
  • Strong non-repudiation
  • RD
  • Secure electronic OTP key distribution (SEOKD)
  • Working in Lab environment

17
Who is using OTP?
  • Governments have always used it for data that
    cant be compromised
  • One example of many
  • Large Latin American Government
  • SIGINT black hole is getting bigger
  • OTP wrap and then use
  • HTTPS, SMTP/TLS, SSH, etc
  • Any protocol even unsecured ones (HTTP, FTP)
  • Security is in the data that was encrypted
  • Field use
  • IT use
  • General communications use

18
Conclusion
  • Its taken us 20 years to get to where we are now
  • We must start to address the problem
  • Jericho is right, we need Inherently Secure
    Protocols
  • Redefine security protocols
  • Educate
  • Work with others
  • Take Risks What were doing isnt working
  • Think outside the box
  • Were getting our butts kicked.
  • Kirk Bailey CISO University of Washington
  • We must have Inherently Secure Protocols for the
    present and the future
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com