Title: NSF Web Site: www'nsf'gov
1NSF the Physics Division
National Science Foundation
Kathy McCloud Physics (PHY) kmccloud_at_nsf.gov
2NSF Strategic Goals
- Discovery
- Foster research that will advance the frontiers
of knowledge, emphasizing areas of greatest
opportunity and potential benefit and
establishing the nation as a global leader in
fundamental and transformational SE. - Learning
- Cultivate a world-class, broadly inclusive SE
workforce, and expand the scientific literacy of
all citizens - Research Infrastructure
- Build the nations research capability through
critical investments in advanced instrumentation,
facilities, cyberinfrastructure, and experimental
tools.
National Science Foundation
3National Science Foundation
National Science Foundation
4Directorate forMathematical and Physical Sciences
National Science Foundation
5PHY Web Site http//www.nsf.gov/physics Most
Have Target Date Sept. 24, 2009 PIF, Plasma
Target Date Oct. 22, 2009 Physics of Living
Systems DEADLINE July 31, 2009 CHECK
TARGET DATES/DEADLINES
Kathy McCloud kmcloud_at_nsf.gov
6Division of Materials Research
- Individual Investigator Programs
- Condensed Matter Physics
- Condensed Matter and Materials Theory
- Biomaterials
- Solid-State and Materials Chemistry
- Polymers
- Metallic Materials and Nanostructures
- Ceramics
- Electronic and Photonic Materials
- Include within IIP
- FRG
- RUI
- GOALI
National Science Foundation
Annual submission window Opens Third
Monday in September Closes First Friday in
November -gt HARD DEADLINE (Opens Sept. 21, 2009
Closes Nov. 6, 2009) check DMR
website STRONGLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT EARLY IN
WINDOW
7Division of Astronomical Sciences
The NSF Division of Astronomical Sciences is the
steward of ground-based astronomical research in
the United States The Division supports research
in all areas of astronomy and astrophysics and
related multidisciplinary studies.
National Science Foundation
- Modes of support include,
- single-investigator and collaborative awards,
- funding for acquisition and development of
astronomical instrumentation, - technology development for future ground-based
facilities, - educational projects that leverage the Division's
research investments to build research and
workforce capacity and to increase scientific
literacy.
http//www.nsf.gov/astronomy
8Proposal WritingBefore You Place Pen to Paper
National Science Foundation
- Search the Award Database
- Investigate Program Websites
- Read Appropriate Solicitation
- Contact the Program Director
- One or two paragraph describing projects
- Possible phone call to talk about the project
- Possible co-review if inter/cross-disciplinary
9Finding Information
Award Search on http//www.nsf.gov
National Science Foundation
10Proposal WritingBefore You Place Pen to Paper II
In Program Announcement/Solicitation, look for
National Science Foundation
- Goal of Program
- Eligibility
- Special proposal preparation and/or award
requirements - Deadlines/Target dates/ Submission windows
- Pre/Full proposal
11Things to consider
- Why do it?
- Why you and not someone else?
- Uniqueness of research, educational
opportunities, available facilities... - What are your strengths?
- Capture the reviewers attention in the summary
and introduction. Make them want to read more. - YOU must convince the reviewer you are worthy of
funding - Express yourself clearly
- Its not the reviewers job to figure out what
you are trying to accomplish and why
National Science Foundation
12Proposal Preparation
Useful Publications
- Proposal Award Policies Procedures Guide
(PAPP) NSF 08-1 (starting Jan. 2009 use NSF
09-1)Â - Combination of the Grant Proposal Guide (GPG) and
the Award Administration Guide (AAG) - Contains guidelines for all proposals (except
when program solicitation stipulates otherwise) - Provides guidance for Award process, from
issuance and administration through closeout - Describes NSF organizations and offices most
relevant to grantees - Provides a list of Statutes and Executive Orders
referenced in PAPP
National Science Foundation
13Potential Pitfalls
- Formatting NEW FONTS SPECIFIED
- References
- See Grant Proposal Guide Chapter II, Section C.2e
- All Authors, Titles of Articles
- Biographical Sketch
- See Grant Proposal Guide Chapter II, Section
C.2f. - Collaborators, Advisors, Advisees
- Intellectual Merit Broader Impact in Project
Summary - Project Description
- Results from Prior NSF support
- Post Doc Mentoring
- Human Subjects (Require IRB approval)
National Science Foundation
Non-conforming proposals may be returned without
review!!!
14Merit Review Criteria
- 1. What is the intellectual merit of the
proposed activity? - How important is the proposed activity to
advancing knowledge and understanding within its
own field or across different fields? How well
qualified is the proposer (individual or team) to
conduct the project? (If appropriate, please
comment on the quality of prior work.) To what
extent does the proposed activity suggest and
explore creative, original, or potentially
transformative concepts? How well conceived and
organized is the proposed activity? Is there
sufficient access to the necessary resources? - 2. What are the broader impacts of the proposed
activity? - How well does the activity advance discovery and
understanding while promoting teaching, training,
and learning? How well does the proposed activity
broaden the participation of underrepresented
groups (e.g., gender, ethnicity, disability,
geographic, etc.)? To what extent will it enhance
the infrastructure for research and education,
such as facilities, instrumentation, networks,
and partnerships? Will the results be
disseminated broadly to enhance scientific and
technological understanding? What may be the
benefits of the proposed activity to society?
National Science Foundation
15Last suggestions
- Dont wait until the deadline to submit
- Download and Print the PDF file after finishing
and double-check the font size, diagrams, etc - Different Program Officers may handle things
differently but you are always safer if you
follow GPG and solicitation guidelines - Get someone else (with experience) to read the
proposal, and leave your ego behind
National Science Foundation
16Funding Decisions Review Criteria
- 1. What is the intellectual merit of the
proposed activity? - How important is the proposed activity to
advancing knowledge and understanding within its
own field or across different fields? How well
qualified is the proposer (individual or team) to
conduct the project? (If appropriate, please
comment on the quality of prior work.) To what
extent does the proposed activity suggest and
explore creative, original, or potentially
transformative concepts? How well conceived and
organized is the proposed activity? Is there
sufficient access to the necessary resources? - 2. What are the broader impacts of the proposed
activity? - How well does the activity advance discovery and
understanding while promoting teaching, training,
and learning? How well does the proposed activity
broaden the participation of underrepresented
groups (e.g., gender, ethnicity, disability,
geographic, etc.)? To what extent will it enhance
the infrastructure for research and education,
such as facilities, instrumentation, networks,
and partnerships? Will the results be
disseminated broadly to enhance scientific and
technological understanding? What may be the
benefits of the proposed activity to society?
National Science Foundation
17Funding Decisions
Along with the advice provided by
reviewers/panels, NSF staff will give careful
consideration to the following in making funding
decisions Integration of Research and
Education One of the principal strategies
in support of NSF's goals is to foster
integration of research and education through the
programs, projects and activities it supports at
academic and research institutions.
Integrating Diversity into NSF Programs,
Projects, and Activities Broadening
opportunities and enabling the participation of
all citizens, women and men, underrepresented
minorities, and persons with disabilities, are
essential to the health and vitality of science
and engineering. NSF is committed to this
principle of diversity and deems it central to
the programs, projects, and activities it
considers and supports.
National Science Foundation
18If Declined
- Dont lose heart but try again
- Common Reasons for Declination
- Trust-me proposal,
- Incremental contribution,
- Weak educational component,
- Expertise gaps, Insufficient fund / time
request, - Not a good fit in the program,
- Bad luck Funding limitations, timing, program
balance - Read Reviews and Panel Summary
- consider comments ( and -), suggestions
- Talk to the Program Director
- Revise proposal and submit again
- Try to express yourself more clearly the next
time - Dont assume same set of reviewers
19Award and Reports
- Award management PI and SRO ( NSF)
- Acknowledge NSF support
- (presentations, publication, press
releases) - 2. Communicate significant accomplishments to PD
- (e.g. Nature/Science articles, press
releases, etc.) - 3. Submit reports on time (Annual Report 90
days prior to anniversary date Final Report 90
days after award expiration) - An overdue report will delay the processing of
pending recommendations and increments. (PIs and
co-PIs) - Pay attention to special reporting requirements
REU, CAREER, Post-Doc Mentoring (new) - Deliver highlights of work as requested/needed
- (DMR requests 2 page power-point slides
annually)
20Other Funding Opportunities
- Faculty Early Career Development Program (CAREER)
- Research in Undergraduate Institutions (RUI)
- Major Research Instrumentation (MRI)
- Research Experience for Undergraduates Sites and
Supplements (REU) - Research Opportunity Awards (ROA)
- Grant Opportunities for Academic Liaison with
Industry (GOALI) - Small Grant for Exploratory Research (SGER) gt
- Grants for Rapid Response research (RAPID)
- Early-concept Grants for Exploratory Research
(EAGER)
National Science Foundation
21CAREER
Faculty Early Career Development Program NSF
08-557
National Science Foundation
Find Link on Crosscutting Programs Page
- NSFs most prestigious awards in support of
junior faculty exemplifying the role of
teacher-scholar - Enhances and emphasizes the importance of
balanced academic careers - Career development plan to integrate research and
education
22CAREER
- ELIGIBILTY
- As of Directorate Deadline
- Hold doctorate in field supported by NSF
- Be untenured
- Not previously received an NSF PECASE or CAREER
award - Have not competed more than two times in NSF
CAREER Program - As of October 1 of submission year be employed
- In a tenure-track (or equivalent) position at US
academic institution or US non-profit, non-degree
granting organization - As an Assistant Professor (or equivalent)
- ASSOCIATE PROFESSORS WITH or WITHOUT TENURE ARE
NOT ELIGIBLE
National Science Foundation
23CAREER
- SIZE
- Lower Limit 400K (total)
- Upper Limit - non specified
- BIO Directorate 500K (total) minimum
- DURATION
- 5 Years
- SUPPLEMENTS
- Standard NSF supplements (see GPG)
- PECASE
- HONORARY ONLY
National Science Foundation
24CAREER
National Science Foundation
- DEPARTMENTAL ENDORSEMENT LETTER
- (About One Page)
- Returned without Review if Missing
- LETTERS OF COMMITMENT/COLLABORATION
- (if needed)
- Short
- Describe collaborative efforts
- Not recommendation/endorsement
25CAREER
- DEADLINES
- July 23, 2009 for MPS, GEO, SBE, OPP
- July 22, 2009 for ENG
- July 21, 2009 for BIO, CISE, EHR
- FASTLANE Submission
- Help desk 1-800-673-6188
- GRANTS.GOV Submission
- Grants.gov User Support 1-800-518-4826
National Science Foundation
26Education and Interdisciplinary Research Physics
Division
- Physics Education Research and Curriculum
Development - Research Experience for Undergraduates
- Research Experience for Teachers
- Interdisciplinary Research with a strong Physics
component - Projects focused on Physics and Education
QuarkNet, CHEPRIO, PhysTEC, and others - Programs aimed at increasing participation in
physics by women, under-represented minorities,
and persons with disabilities
National Science Foundation
27Physics Education Research and Curriculum
Development
- Target date September 26
- Supports activities that seek to improve the
education and - training of physics students (both
undergraduate and - graduate), such as curriculum development for
upper-level - physics courses
National Science Foundation
28Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) -
sites and supplements
- Undergraduates spend from 6 10 weeks at a
university (usually not their home institution
for REU sites) - Research with a faculty mentor
- Students receive stipend (450 per week)
- Most have graduate school prep (sites)
National Science Foundation
90 of students involved in an SRI study of
undergraduate research stated that undergraduate
research experiences had a role in career
decisions (67 increased interest in a career in
research, 21 decreased)
29RET supplements and sites
- K-12 Teachers spend 6-8 weeks at a university
- Research with a faculty mentor
- Guidance in introducing research topic into
classroom
National Science Foundation
The 5 QuarkNet teachers participating in the
University of Michigan Quarknet-CERN Research
Experience for Teachers Program in 2007. From
left to right Peter Grach, Stacy McCormack, Jack
Willis, Shane Wood, and Marla Glover.Â
30Physics and Education Projects
- QuarkNet Large Hadron Collider (LHC) physics
and teachers - CHEPREO - Center for High-Energy Physics Research
and Educational Outreach - PhysTEC initiative from APS, AAPT, and AIP to
improve physics teacher preparation - LIGO Science Education Center (Livingston,
Louisiana) in conjunction with Southern
University of Baton Rouge. Searching for
gravitational waves
National Science Foundation
FIU (CHEPREO) graduate students (Luis Lebolo)
shown installing temperature and humidity sensors
for CMS at CERN.
31NSF Updates by EMail
Sign up to find out about NEW program
announcements of INTEREST to YOU.
National Science Foundation