Title: CJ1 1
1An Introduction to Composite Steel Joists
Research and Behavior
David Samuelson, P.E. Manager for Nucor
Corporations Research and Development for
Downstream Products, Norfolk, NE Perry S. Green,
Ph.D. Technical Director Steel Joist Institute,
Myrtle Beach, SC
2History of Composite Steel Joists
- 1960s Lembeck Wang and Kaley. First
experimental research conducted utilizing OWSJ as
part of a composite joist system.
3History of Composite Steel Joists
- 1970s Tide and Galambos. Looked at stud shear
connection behavior to develop composite action.
4History of Composite Steel Joists
- 1980s Leon and Curry Alsamsam. Verification
that a composite beam model could be used to
predict the ultimate capacity of composite steel
joists.
5History of Composite Steel Joists
Summary of Composite Steel Joist Research
Projects University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
1Test performed by Alsamsam, 1988, Curry, 1988
6University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN
7History of Composite Steel Joists
- 1990s Patras and Azizinimini. Accurate
predictions of ultimate load-carrying capacities
of composite steel joists when different concrete
strengths are used.
8History of Composite Steel Joists
Summary of Composite Steel Joist Research
Projects University of Nebraska- Lincoln, NE
2Test performed by Patras and Azizinimini, 1991
9University of Nebraska, Lincoln NE
10History of Composite Steel Joists
- 1990s-2000s Avci, Easterling, Gibbings,
Lyons, Murray, Nguyen, Roddenberry, Sublett.
Examination of the behavior of composite steel
joists Ultimate strength prediction models
Strength and behavior of stud shear connectors.
11History of Composite Steel Joists
Table 1 Summary of Composite Steel Joist
Research Projects
Summary of Composite Steel Joist Research
Projects Virginia Polytechnic Institute,
Blacksburg, VA
3Test performed by Nguyen, Gibbings, Easterling,
and Murray, 1991, Gibbings and Easterling,
1991, Gibbings, Easterling, and Murray, 1996
12Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State
University, Blacksburg VA
13Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State
University, Blacksburg VA
14Composite Joist Model
15Experimental Research
- Bottom Chord Behavior
- Top Chord Behavior
- Web Behavior
- Shear Stud Behavior
16Bottom Chord Behavior
17Top Chord Behavior
18Web Behavior
19Composite Steel Joist Design
- ?Mn minimum design flexural strength of
composite section determined as follows. - Mu required flexural strength determined from
applied factored loads, kip-in. (N-mm)
20Shear Stud Behavior
21Shear Stud Layout in Strong Position
22Shear Stud Layout in Weak Position
23Shear Capacity of a Single Shear Stud
24Shear Capacity of a Single Shear Stud
Notes 1) Wr _at_ mid-height Average deck rib
width of deck rib containing the shear stud.
2) The deck is assumed to be oriented
perpendicular to the joists.
25Composite Steel Joist Components
26Summary
- A significant amount of data has been accumulated
from testing that has been performed on composite
steel joists over the past 40 years. - The results of the experimental and analytical
research projects have been reviewed by the Steel
Joist Institutes Composite Joist Committee and
the committee determined that it is possible to
accurately predict the load-carrying capacities
and deflection behavior of composite steel
joists.
27Summary
- The Composite Joist Committee found that the
ultimate strength models that were originally
developed for composite wide flange beams are
applicable to composite steel joists. - Based on all the available information to date on
the behavior of composite steel joists, the
committee was able to develop the new Standard
Specifications for Composite Steel Joists,
CJ-Series
28Any Questions?
SJI Website http//www.steeljoist.org/composite