Decision Making and Teamwork

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Decision Making and Teamwork

Description:

Time pressures or disbursement that doesn't support group meetings. Insufficient skill by manger (GP, CR, PS) Types of participation. Responding to complaints ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:47
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: terryt3

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Decision Making and Teamwork


1
Decision Making and Teamwork
  • BUSN 653
  • Terry Tonkin
  • Week 9

2
Devotion
  • Christine Isaac

3
UM Notes
  • The requirement to develop a process chart has
    been deleted.
  • Modules can be used by classroom and distance
    students. Activity states all students or
    distance only
  • Blackboard issues
  • Discuss wait management problem from previous
    week.

4
Learning Objectives
  • Explain the factors related to the use of
    participatory decision making.
  • Define the concept of employee empowerment and
    demonstrate its impact on management and the
    organization.
  • Distinguish between traditional work groups and
    self-managed teams

5
Participatory Leadership
  • Participatory leadership involves efforts by a
    manager to encourage and facilitate participation
    by others in making decisions that would
    otherwise be make by the manager alone.
  • Why do we want participation by employees?

6
Strengths of PL
  • Bounded Rationality-- quality
  • New ways of thinking -- quality
  • Empowerment -- buy in
  • However, there is no definitive conclusions from
    research (Ex hospital, Yukl, p. 125)
  • Various forms of participation are effective in
    some situations, but not others

7
Why does PL fail?
  • Lack of shared objectives between leader and
    employees
  • Employees dont want to share responsibility
  • If there is distrust
  • Time pressures or disbursement that doesnt
    support group meetings
  • Insufficient skill by manger (GP, CR, PS)

8
Types of participation
  • Responding to complaints
  • Soliciting input
  • Joint decision-making
  • Delegation

Autocratic Decision
Consultation
Joint Decisions
Delegation
9
Vroom and Yetton Model
  • Decision quality and decision acceptance
  • Decision quality
  • distribution of information and ability to
    problem-solve
  • Decision acceptance
  • participation increases acceptance of
    decision--better understanding of situation and
    buy in

10
Decision Procedures
  • Leader makes autocratic decision
  • Leader collects information from employees and
    makes decision
  • Leader shares problem with subordinates
    individually and collects ideas and suggestions.
    Leader makes decision.
  • Leader shares problem with group and makes
    decisions.
  • Leader attempts to achieve group consensus

11
Guidelines
  • Guidelines for successful participation (Yukl, p.
    133)
  • Guidelines for successful delegation
  • (Yukl, p. 141)

12
Delegation
  • Assignment of new responsibilities to
    subordinate, and the
  • Authority to carry them out.
  • Potential benefits
  • better decisions
  • increased subordinate motivation
  • develop subordinate skills
  • reduction of work for manager
  • Keys to success -- types of issues and quality of
    delegation process

13
Empowerment
  • To foster employee empowerment, mangers must
    share
  • Information about the organizations performance
  • Rewards based on the organizations performance
  • Knowledge that enables employees to understand
    and contribute to organizational performance
  • Power to make decisions that influence
    organizational direction and performance.

14
Group Activity
  • Form into groups of 5 or 6.
  • As a group, provide an example of when each of
    the following decision styles is appropriate
  • Leader makes autocratic decision
  • Leader collects information from employees and
    makes decision
  • Leader shares problem with subordinates
    individually and collects ideas and suggestions.
    Leader makes decision.
  • Leader shares problem with group and makes
    decisions.
  • Leader attempts to achieve group consensus

15
Case Study
  • Newport News Shipbuilding
  • Jake Priode

16
Teamwork
  • Teams typically outperform individuals when doing
    tasks that require judgement, experience, and
    multiple skills.
  • Companies using self-managed work teams have
    increased productivity, quality, customer
    satisfaction and flexibility, streamlining of
    functions and worker commitment.

17
Teams versus work groups
  • Characterized by a high degree of synergy as team
    works on process
  • Emphasis on collective performance
  • Members care for and hold one-another accountable
  • Work on tasks independently, not collectively
  • Emphasis on individual performance.
  • Emphasis on sharing information and making
    decisions that help group members perform better

18
Self-directed Work Team
  • Operate very autonomously
  • Solve problems, implement solutions, and measure
    outcomes
  • Typically composed of 10-15 individuals
  • Flexibility -- teammates may be manager for the
    day(Ritz Carlton)
  • Increases employee satisfaction and morale
  • Example purchase of fans in discount store

19
Challenges to create teams
  • Takes considerable time, effort, organizational
    commitment -- trust!
  • Team members must have technical skills and also
    develop skills in problem solving, decision
    making, interpersonal skills, and team
    management.
  • Creative reward and incentive programs
  • New role managers as facilitators and mentors.

20
Building work teams
  • Work teams are grown
  • Forming -- identifying acceptable behaviors,
    individual goals and motivations, and commitment
  • Storming -- Emerging conflicts, doubts,
    frustrations, some members may leave
  • Norming -- Sense of cohesiveness, conflict over
    ideas
  • Performing -- Work well with everyone, make
    decisions easily, understand roles

21
Application -- Option 1
  • Employ the Vroom and Yetton decision model (page
    129) to guide your approach to making one
    decision in your selected organization. Write a
    summary of the problem and how you managed the
    process according to the decision model. Comment
    on the outcome.
  • OR

22
Application -- Option 2
  • If you do not have access to the above
    opportunity, please complete the exercise by
    reviewing an exceptionally good (or bad)
    historical example. Site the problem, how the
    principles of the Vroom and Yetton decision model
    were used (or not used). Comment on the
    outcome.

23
Submission
  • Provide a one to two page summary of the
    problem, process (good or bad) and final outcome.
    Post your assignment in the appropriate
    discussion forum no later than 2359 on November
    12, 2000.

24
Questions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)