Idaho State Department Of Agriculture - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Idaho State Department Of Agriculture

Description:

Grower called in the morning to have the labor foreman and his crew weed his onion field ... Communication with workers only two EMRs spoke Spanish ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: bobsp7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Idaho State Department Of Agriculture


1
Idaho State DepartmentOf Agriculture
2
Bob SpencerAgriculture Program Manager(208)
332-8613bspencer_at_agri.state.id.us
Division of Agricultural Resources
3
(No Transcript)
4
Canyon County Worker Exposure Case
July 5, 2005
  • Grower called in the morning to have the labor
    foreman and his crew weed his onion field
  • Grower called his fieldman to check his onions
    for insects and diseases
  • Grower and fieldman decided onions needed
    spraying with Lannate Mustang Max Dithane
  • Fieldman delivered chemical to applicator and
    mapped out the fields to be sprayed
  • Applicator (office manager) told fieldman they
    might get to it that evening

5
(No Transcript)
6
Worker Exposure Case (cont.)
  • Workers showed up on the afternoon of July 5th
    and weeded part of the onion field
  • Applicator started spraying the onion fields at
    2358 hours on July 5th and finished at 0130 hours
    on July 6th.

7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
Worker Exposure Case (cont.)
  • 29 field workers entered the field at 0600 hours
    and finished weeding the field at 1100 hours
  • Workers moved to a sugar beet field, became
    nauseous, dizzy, vomiting, diarrhea, difficulty
    breathing
  • Crew foremen called 911
  • HazMat Response Team setup decontamination site

10
  • Concerns during Emergency Medical Response
  • Privacy of individuals during decontamination
  • Communication with workers only two EMRs spoke
    Spanish
  • Chain-of-Custody issues to collect clothing
    samples

11
Worker Exposure Case (cont.)
  • Several workers sent to hospital to be checked
    out, some were kept overnight, others were
    released and told not to go back to the fields
    for several days
  • ISDA initiated investigation on July 6th
  • ISDA attended public meeting with workers
  • Lots of media attention locally nationwide

12
(No Transcript)
13
Lannate LV Label
14
Lannate LV Label
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
Worker Exposure Case (cont.)
  • Applicator failed to notify the grower when the
    field was going to be sprayed
  • Grower was notified by applicator on the
    afternoon of July 6th the field had been sprayed

19
Worker Exposure Case Violations Penalties
  • Grower
  • Failed to train his workers
  • Failed to maintain Central Location
  • 3 counts of Use Inconsistent with the label
    WPS
  • 3,000 x 3 9,000 total civil penalty
  • Paid penalty 6,750

20
Worker Exposure Case Violations Penalties
  • Labor Contractor
  • Failed to train workers
  • Failed to have decontamination site available
  • 3 counts of Use Inconsistent with the label
    WPS
  • 3,000 x 3 9,000 total civil penalty

21
Worker Exposure Case Violations Penalties
  • Applicator (second offense within past 3 years)
  • Failed to provide Exchange of Information to
    grower
  • 3 counts of Use Inconsistent with the label
    WPS
  • 3,000 x 3 9,000 civil penalty
  • 8 days license suspension x 3 24 days license
    suspension
  • 1 count of Faulty, Careless Negligence
  • 3,000 x 1 3,000 civil penalty
  • 8 days license suspension x 1 8 days license
    suspension
  • Total penalty
  • 12, 000 20 consecutive days license suspension

22
Worker Exposure Case Violations Penalties
  • Applicator Company
  • Failed to provide Exchange of Information to
    grower
  • Employees cited previously
  • 3 counts of Use Inconsistent with the label
    WPS
  • 3,000 x 3 9,000 civil penalty
  • 1 count of Faulty, Careless Negligence
  • 3,000 x 1 3,000 civil penalty
  • Total Penalty
  • 12,000

23
Worker Exposure Case Other
  • Referral to EPA to review Lannate label
  • Posting only required for grapes
  • Lack of interest for changing label from EPA
    DuPont
  • EPA Criminal investigation was initiated
  • Criminal case was dropped
  • Pending lawsuit from workers
  • At least four workers still claiming adverse
    effects
  • Increased Insurance Premiums
  • Workmans Compensation claims
  • Local and National media attention
  • ICAN proposed new Rules
  • Rule was held in committee March 2006
  • Legislative tour scheduled in July 2006
  • Reintroduce revised legislation in 2007

24
THANK YOU! ANY QUESTIONS?
  • Bob Spencer
  • Division of Agricultural Resources
  • (208) 332-8613
  • bspencer_at_agri.state.id.us
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com