MAXIM Pathfinder - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

MAXIM Pathfinder

Description:

At grazing angles, mirrors that are diffraction limited at UV are also ... The mirrors and their associated thermal control are not a tremendous leap away. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:52
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: keithge
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: MAXIM Pathfinder


1
MAXIM Pathfinder
  • Keith Gendreau, Webster Cash,
  • Ann Shipley, and Nick White

2
MAXIM Pathfinder
  • Science Goals
  • Provide Scientific Context for MAXIM
  • Study stellar coronae, AGN jets, accretion disks,
    and more
  • Technical Role and Issues
  • Provides for 2 intermediate technical stepping
    stones toward full MAXIM
  • Current Baseline Design
  • More robust and scalable toward a full MAXIM
    mission
  • Tallest Technical Poles
  • Line-of-Sight alignment of multiple spacecraft
  • Pointing of individual spacecraft
  • Formation Flying

3
Visiting a Blackhole with an X-ray Interferometer
  • Current best estimates for the size of the event
    horizon of a blackhole a few microarcseconds
  • Variability and spectral data describe an x-ray
    bright region near the event horizon.
  • Baselines at 1-10Ã… are a factor of of 1000
    shorter than at 1000-10000Ã…
  • The MAXIM mission will have resolution of 0.1
    ?as.
  • For Scientific and Technical context, we are
    exploring MAXIM Pathfinder mission concepts.

http//maxim.gsfc.nasa.gov
4
Visiting a Black Hole with an X-ray
Interferometer
  • AGN
  • Stellar Coronae

X-ray variability of 1000 seconds suggests
that the hard emission is coming from a
few Rs
Calculated Image of M87 _at_ 0.1 mas
Capella simulation 1 mas and 10000 sq cm
5
(No Transcript)
6
A Simple X-ray Interferometer
L
d
Beams Cross
Flats
Detector
  • Grazing Incidence softens tolerances by 2
    orders of magnitude. Optics that are diffraction
    limited for normal incidence UV is diffraction
    limited for grazing incidence X-rays.
  • Use simple optics to keep diffraction limit.
  • Demonstrated in lab at 10 Angstroms (1.25 keV).
    W. Cash et al, Nature 407 14 September 2000

s
Fringe Spacing
7
Grazing Incidence is an Advantage for X-ray
Interferometry
1/sinq for 2 degrees Loosens the baseline
tolerances by 2 orders of magnitude. --gt 1-10
nm baseline tolerance.
8
Laboratory Demonstration
Experiment by CU and MSFC. l 10 Angstroms
(1.25 keV) 1mm Baseline 100 mas l/20
flat mirrors 100 m optics/detector
distance X-ray CCD Detector
W. Cash et al, Nature 407 14 September 2000
9
Fringes at 1.25keV
W. Cash et al Nature 407 14 September 2000
Profile Across Illuminated Region
10
Basic MAXIM Design
Baseline
Fringes Form Here
  • Each Channel Consists of 2 flats
  • Primary mirrors determine baseline
  • Secondary mirrors combine channels at detector.

To implement this basic design, you choose how to
group the mirrors.
11
Original MAXIM Implementations
MAXIM Pathfinder
  • Easy Formation Flying (mm control)
  • Optics in 1 s/c act like a thin lens

1-2 m Baseline
10 m
500 km
Full MAXIM- the black hole imager
  • Nanometer formation flying
  • Primaries must point to milliarcseconds

500-1000 m Baseline
5000 km
10 km
12
MAXIM
Pathfinder
  • 1-2 m Baseline
  • Optics in one spacecraft.
  • Detectors in separate spacecraft.
  • Formation Flying at 50-500km separation
    in order to make fringes well matched to detector
    pixels

L50-500 km!
Detector Spacecraft
  • 100?as Resolution
  • Laser alignment system provides metrology
    between satellites.
  • Much more complicated for Full MAXIM mission

Optic Spacecraft
13
Original Full Maxim Design
C
O
N
S
T
E
L
L
A
T
I
O
N
B
O
R
E
S
I
G
H
T
H
u
b

S
p
a
c
e
c
r
a
f
t
1
0
K
M
  • 200 M baseline
  • Optics divided between multiple spacecraft.
  • 0.1 mas Angular Resolution
  • Extreme Formation Flying
  • Detector flown 1000s of km from optics to make
    fringes comparable to detector pixel sizes

5
0
0
0
D
E
L
A
Y

L
I
N
E
K
M
S
P
A
C
E
C
R
A
F
T
14
Improved MAXIM Implementation
Group and package Primary and Secondary Mirrors
as Periscope Pairs
20,000 km
500-1000 m Baseline
  • Easy Formation Flying (microns)
  • All s/c act like thin lenses- Higher Robustness
  • Possibility to introduce phase control within one
    space craft- an x-ray delay line- More
    Flexibility
  • Offers more optimal UV-Plane coverage- Less
    dependence on Detector Energy Resolution
  • Each Module, self contained- Lower Risk.

A scalable MAXIM concept.
15
Periscope Implementation to Hold MAXIM Mirrors
  • In original implementations for MAXIM, the
    primary mirrors are held in separate spacecrafts
    from those for the secondary mirrors.
  • Requires milliarcsecond pointing and nm
    formation flying control for satellites
  • Limits our coverage of the UV plane
  • The new Periscope concept groups the primary
    mirrors with their secondary mirrors to form
    periscopes.
  • Essentially the same basic design, but this
    grouping behaves as a thin lens.
  • Requires milliarcsecond pointing but only 10
    micron formation flying control for space craft.
    More robust than original implementation.
  • Allows for optimal sampling of UV plane
  • Lower risk, since each periscope module is fully
    contained.
  • Lower Costs as the individual periscope modules
    can be mass produced
  • Direct scalability from pathfinder to full MAXIM
    using the same technology.

16
A thin lens bends light in-phase to a point.
A thin lens can be simulated with a series of
periscopes bending light toa point in-phase.
Periscopes to be placed on paraboloidal surface
to achievephase closure, or we can individually
adjust phase for each periscope.
17
Rotating a thin lens does not change the position
of the focus.
Nor will the periscope approximation.
18
Periscope Module Optics Layout
LOS
Primary
Secondary
Y
Pitch
Yaw
Z
Roll
X
LOS
To Detector
19
The New MAXIM Pathfinder
  • 2 mission phases
  • phase 1 100 mas Science
  • Very similar to original MP concept, but some
    looser tolerances
  • 2 formation flying s/c
  • Studies Stars, AGN, Black hole Jets and Accretion
    Disks
  • phase 2 1 mas Science
  • Optics s/c separates into 7 s/c to extend
    angular resolution to a few mas
  • Tougher Formation Flying tolerances (10 microns)
  • Tougher Line-Of-Sight Requirements
  • Get a Glimpse of a Black Hole Event Horizon!
  • Test and develop concepts for the full MAXIM
    mission
  • Design to accomplish all mode 1 science with
    capability to explore mode 2 science
  • Gyroscope Solution instead of SIM for telescope
    alignment
  • Grass roots and Parametric Costs Analysis 550M

20
Principle Differences Between the Original
Pathfinder and the New MAXIM Pathfinder
  • 2 Phases
  • Relative Astrometry with High Precision Gyros
    instead of absolute Astrometry with SIM
  • CCD Detectors instead of Calorimeters
  • New Pathfinder provides intermediate scientific
    and technical steps between 100 mas and 0.1 mas
    imaging.

21
Launch Configuration
Delta IV 5m X 14.3m fairing
Delta IV Heavy 5m X 19.1m fairing
Propulsion/Hub SpaceCraft
Sta. 7600
Delta IV 5m X 14.3m fairing
Sta. 4300
Hub SpaceCraft/Detector SpaceCraft
C.G. Sta. 2500
Sta. 1550
Propulsion/Hub SpaceCraft
P/L Sta. 0.00
22
Mission Sequence
1 km
Science Phase 2 High Resolution (100 nas)
Science Phase 1 Low Resolution (100 mas)
Launch
200 km
20,000 km
Transfer Stage
23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
Technical Components Mirror Modules
  • Grazing Incidence Mirrors
  • Grazing Incidence loosens our surface quality and
    figure requirements by 1/sinq
  • Flatness gt l/100
  • Simple shapes like spheres and flats can be
    made perfect enough
  • At grazing angles, mirrors that are diffraction
    limited at UV are also diffraction limited at
    X-ray wavelengths
  • Long and Skinny
  • Bundled in Pairs to act as Thin Lens
  • Thermal/mechanical Stability appropriate to gt
    l/100.

26
Technical Components Arrays of Optics
  • Baselines of gt 100 m required for angular
    resolution.
  • Formation flying a must for distance gt20 m.
  • Miniaturization of ALL satellite subsystems to
    ease access to space.
  • S/C Control to 10 mm- using periscope
    configuration (metrology to better than 1 mm).
  • A system spanning from metrology to propulsion
  • Individual optic modules are thin lenses with
    HUGE fields of view

27
Technical Components The detector
  • In Silicon, the minimum X-ray event size is 1 mm
  • Large CCD arrays possible with fast readout of
    small regions.
  • Pixel size determines the focal length of the
    interferometer Fs/qres
  • 10 mm pixels -gt Focal lengths of 100s to 1000s of
    km.
  • Formation Flying Necessary
  • Huge Depth of focus loosens longitudinal control
    (meters)
  • Large array sizes loosen lateral control
    (inches).
  • High angular resolution requirement to resolve a
    black hole The Line-Of-Sight Requirement.

28
Technical Components Line-of-Sight
  • We must know where this telescope points to
    10s-100s of nanoarcseconds
  • Required for ALL microarcsecond imagers
  • The individual components need an ACS system good
    to only arcseconds (they are thin lenses)
  • We only ask for relative stability of the LOS-
    not absolute astrometry
  • This is the largest technical hurdle for MAXIM-
    particularly as the formation flying tolerance
    has been increased to microns

29
Using a Super Startracker to align two
spacecraft to a target.
In the simplest concept, a Super Star Tracker
Sees both Reference stars and a beacon on the
other space craft. It should be able to track
relative drift between the reference and the
beacon to 30 microarcseconds- in the case of
MAXIM Pathfinder.
For a number of reasons (proper motion,
aberration of light, faintness of stars,) an
inertial reference may be more appropriate than
guiding on stars. The inertial reference has to
be stable at a fraction of the angular resolution
for hours to a day. This would require an
extremely stable gyroscope (eg GP-B, superfluid
gyroscopes, atomic interferometer gyroscopes).
?o
dX
The basic procedure here, is to align three
points (the detector, the optics, and the target)
so they form a straight line with kinks less
than the angular resolution. The detector and
the optics behave as thin lenses- and we are
basically insensitive to their rotations. We are
sensitive to a displacement from the
Line-of-Sight (eg dX).
?d
30
Options to Determine Line-Of-Sight
  • All options require beacons and beacon trackers
    to know where one s/c is relative to another.
  • OPTION 1 Track on guide stars
  • Use a good wavelength (radio, optical, x-ray)
  • Use a good telescope or an interferometer
  • OPTION 2 Use an inertial reference
  • Use a VERY good gyroscope or accelerometer
  • GP-B

31
Summary of Key Technical Challenges
  • The mirrors and their associated thermal control
    are not a tremendous leap away.
  • Periscope implementation loosens formation
    flying tolerance from nm to mm. This makes
    formation flying our second most challenging
    requirement.
  • Determination of the line-of-sight alignment of
    multiple spacecraft with our target is the most
    serious challenge- and MAXIM is not alone with
    this.

32
Using Stars as a Stable Reference
  • A diffraction limited telescope will have a PSF
    l/D
  • If you get N photons, you can centroid a position
    to l/D / N1/2
  • Nearby stars have mas and mas structure
  • Stars move so you need VERY accurate Gimbals
  • Parallax (stars _at_500 pc can move up to 40 mas in
    a day)
  • Aberration of Light (as big as 40 mas in a
    minute)
  • Stellar orbits, wobble due to planets
  • Other effects

33
An Optical Star Tracker
  • A reasonable size telescope (lt1m diam.) _at_
    optical wavelengths will require 1012 photons to
    centroid to 0.1 mas.
  • Practical limits on centroiding (1/1000) will
    need large F numbers
  • Lack of bright stars requires complicated gimbals
    to find guide stars
  • HST would barely squeak by with 15th mag stars

34
MAXIM Pathfinder Overview
http//maxim.gsfc.nasa.gov
  • Objectives
  • Demonstrate X-ray interferometry in space as
    pathfinder to full up MAXIM
  • Image with 100 micro-arc second resolution using
    a 1-2 m baseline
  • 1000 times improvement on Chandra
  • Coronae of nearby stars
  • Jets from black holes
  • Accretion disks
  • Two spacecraft flying in formation
  • Telescope spacecraft with all the optics
  • 300 micro arc sec pointing control
  • 30 micro arc sec knowledge
  • Detector spacecraft positioned 50-500 km ?10 m
    and laterally aligned ? 2 mm from Telescope
    spacecraft to make fringes well matched to
    detector pixels
  • Detector and optics fit within medium class
    launch vehicle (e.g., Delta IV H)

Detector Spacecraft
L50-500 km!
Optic Spacecraft
35
Key Technologies for MAXIM
  • Super Star Tracker
  • High efficiency, reliability lasers (eg LISA 10
    efficiency, gt 5year life, micron wavelength, 1
    watt output power)
  • High precision, low drift gyroscopes (better than
    1 mas/day drift eg. GP-B, superfluid gyroscopes,
    atomic interferometer gyroscopes )
  • Thermal Mechanically Stable Telescopes (eg Quartz
    telescope on GP-B, 0.1-1nm stability over m
    long structures)
  • Low power, light weight, 0.1 arcsecond class
    star trackers (eg. N. Clark _at_ Langley 2 watts,
    200 gram)
  • formation flying sensor and initial target
    acquisition
  • Wide dynamic range propulsion (5 orders of
    magnitude of thrust down to mN)
  • PPTs, FEEPS, MEMS microthrusters
  • Light weight, flat (2 nm figure) oblong optics.

36
Technologies Potentially Useful in Aligning MAXIM
(Super Startracker)
  • Thermal/Mechanically stable telescopes with high
    speed readouts to monitor the position of
    formation flying s/c.
  • High Reliability, Efficiency Lasers (eg. LISA)
  • 10 efficiency, l micron, gt5 year life
  • High Precision/Low Drift Gyroscopes Options
  • GP-B superconducting gyroscope (0.3 mas/day)
  • Superfluid quantum gyroscope (R. Packard Group
    at Berkeley, K. Schwab at UMD- now at 100
    mas/hour with potential to go to
    nanoarcseconds/day)
  • Atomic interferometer gyroscope (now at 10s of
    mas/sec with potential to go to 10
    nanoarcseconds/day)

37
An Alternate MAXIM Approach Normal incidence,
multilayer coated, aspheric mirrors
  • Optics demonstrated today with 1-2 Angstrom
    figure
  • Multilayer Coatings yield narrow bandpass images
    in the 19-34 Angstrom range
  • Could be useful as elements of the prime
    interferometer or for alignment
  • Offers focusing and magnification to design
  • May require tighter individual element alignments
    and stiffer structures.

38
Overview
  • Developed new implementation of MAXIM design
    which offers
  • Much looser formation flying tolerances (mm
    instead of nm)
  • Better coverage of the UV plane
  • Easier scalability
  • Completed a GSFC Instrument Synthesis Analysis
    Lab (ISAL) study of a superstar tracker to
    address alignment of microarcsecond class
    instruments
  • Completed a GSFC Integrated Mission Design
    Center (IMDC) study of a new MAXIM Pathfinder
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com