Title: MAXIM Pathfinder
1MAXIM Pathfinder
- Keith Gendreau, Webster Cash,
- Ann Shipley, and Nick White
2MAXIM Pathfinder
- Science Goals
- Provide Scientific Context for MAXIM
- Study stellar coronae, AGN jets, accretion disks,
and more - Technical Role and Issues
- Provides for 2 intermediate technical stepping
stones toward full MAXIM - Current Baseline Design
- More robust and scalable toward a full MAXIM
mission - Tallest Technical Poles
- Line-of-Sight alignment of multiple spacecraft
- Pointing of individual spacecraft
- Formation Flying
3Visiting a Blackhole with an X-ray Interferometer
- Current best estimates for the size of the event
horizon of a blackhole a few microarcseconds - Variability and spectral data describe an x-ray
bright region near the event horizon. - Baselines at 1-10Ã… are a factor of of 1000
shorter than at 1000-10000Ã… - The MAXIM mission will have resolution of 0.1
?as. - For Scientific and Technical context, we are
exploring MAXIM Pathfinder mission concepts.
http//maxim.gsfc.nasa.gov
4Visiting a Black Hole with an X-ray
Interferometer
X-ray variability of 1000 seconds suggests
that the hard emission is coming from a
few Rs
Calculated Image of M87 _at_ 0.1 mas
Capella simulation 1 mas and 10000 sq cm
5(No Transcript)
6A Simple X-ray Interferometer
L
d
Beams Cross
Flats
Detector
- Grazing Incidence softens tolerances by 2
orders of magnitude. Optics that are diffraction
limited for normal incidence UV is diffraction
limited for grazing incidence X-rays. - Use simple optics to keep diffraction limit.
- Demonstrated in lab at 10 Angstroms (1.25 keV).
W. Cash et al, Nature 407 14 September 2000
s
Fringe Spacing
7Grazing Incidence is an Advantage for X-ray
Interferometry
1/sinq for 2 degrees Loosens the baseline
tolerances by 2 orders of magnitude. --gt 1-10
nm baseline tolerance.
8Laboratory Demonstration
Experiment by CU and MSFC. l 10 Angstroms
(1.25 keV) 1mm Baseline 100 mas l/20
flat mirrors 100 m optics/detector
distance X-ray CCD Detector
W. Cash et al, Nature 407 14 September 2000
9Fringes at 1.25keV
W. Cash et al Nature 407 14 September 2000
Profile Across Illuminated Region
10Basic MAXIM Design
Baseline
Fringes Form Here
- Each Channel Consists of 2 flats
- Primary mirrors determine baseline
- Secondary mirrors combine channels at detector.
To implement this basic design, you choose how to
group the mirrors.
11Original MAXIM Implementations
MAXIM Pathfinder
- Easy Formation Flying (mm control)
- Optics in 1 s/c act like a thin lens
1-2 m Baseline
10 m
500 km
Full MAXIM- the black hole imager
- Nanometer formation flying
- Primaries must point to milliarcseconds
500-1000 m Baseline
5000 km
10 km
12MAXIM
Pathfinder
- 1-2 m Baseline
- Optics in one spacecraft.
- Detectors in separate spacecraft.
- Formation Flying at 50-500km separation
in order to make fringes well matched to detector
pixels
L50-500 km!
Detector Spacecraft
- 100?as Resolution
- Laser alignment system provides metrology
between satellites. - Much more complicated for Full MAXIM mission
Optic Spacecraft
13Original Full Maxim Design
C
O
N
S
T
E
L
L
A
T
I
O
N
B
O
R
E
S
I
G
H
T
H
u
b
S
p
a
c
e
c
r
a
f
t
1
0
K
M
- 200 M baseline
- Optics divided between multiple spacecraft.
- 0.1 mas Angular Resolution
- Extreme Formation Flying
- Detector flown 1000s of km from optics to make
fringes comparable to detector pixel sizes
5
0
0
0
D
E
L
A
Y
L
I
N
E
K
M
S
P
A
C
E
C
R
A
F
T
14Improved MAXIM Implementation
Group and package Primary and Secondary Mirrors
as Periscope Pairs
20,000 km
500-1000 m Baseline
- Easy Formation Flying (microns)
- All s/c act like thin lenses- Higher Robustness
- Possibility to introduce phase control within one
space craft- an x-ray delay line- More
Flexibility - Offers more optimal UV-Plane coverage- Less
dependence on Detector Energy Resolution - Each Module, self contained- Lower Risk.
A scalable MAXIM concept.
15Periscope Implementation to Hold MAXIM Mirrors
- In original implementations for MAXIM, the
primary mirrors are held in separate spacecrafts
from those for the secondary mirrors. - Requires milliarcsecond pointing and nm
formation flying control for satellites - Limits our coverage of the UV plane
- The new Periscope concept groups the primary
mirrors with their secondary mirrors to form
periscopes. - Essentially the same basic design, but this
grouping behaves as a thin lens. - Requires milliarcsecond pointing but only 10
micron formation flying control for space craft.
More robust than original implementation. - Allows for optimal sampling of UV plane
- Lower risk, since each periscope module is fully
contained. - Lower Costs as the individual periscope modules
can be mass produced - Direct scalability from pathfinder to full MAXIM
using the same technology.
16A thin lens bends light in-phase to a point.
A thin lens can be simulated with a series of
periscopes bending light toa point in-phase.
Periscopes to be placed on paraboloidal surface
to achievephase closure, or we can individually
adjust phase for each periscope.
17Rotating a thin lens does not change the position
of the focus.
Nor will the periscope approximation.
18Periscope Module Optics Layout
LOS
Primary
Secondary
Y
Pitch
Yaw
Z
Roll
X
LOS
To Detector
19The New MAXIM Pathfinder
- 2 mission phases
- phase 1 100 mas Science
- Very similar to original MP concept, but some
looser tolerances - 2 formation flying s/c
- Studies Stars, AGN, Black hole Jets and Accretion
Disks - phase 2 1 mas Science
- Optics s/c separates into 7 s/c to extend
angular resolution to a few mas - Tougher Formation Flying tolerances (10 microns)
- Tougher Line-Of-Sight Requirements
- Get a Glimpse of a Black Hole Event Horizon!
- Test and develop concepts for the full MAXIM
mission - Design to accomplish all mode 1 science with
capability to explore mode 2 science - Gyroscope Solution instead of SIM for telescope
alignment - Grass roots and Parametric Costs Analysis 550M
20Principle Differences Between the Original
Pathfinder and the New MAXIM Pathfinder
- 2 Phases
- Relative Astrometry with High Precision Gyros
instead of absolute Astrometry with SIM - CCD Detectors instead of Calorimeters
- New Pathfinder provides intermediate scientific
and technical steps between 100 mas and 0.1 mas
imaging.
21Launch Configuration
Delta IV 5m X 14.3m fairing
Delta IV Heavy 5m X 19.1m fairing
Propulsion/Hub SpaceCraft
Sta. 7600
Delta IV 5m X 14.3m fairing
Sta. 4300
Hub SpaceCraft/Detector SpaceCraft
C.G. Sta. 2500
Sta. 1550
Propulsion/Hub SpaceCraft
P/L Sta. 0.00
22Mission Sequence
1 km
Science Phase 2 High Resolution (100 nas)
Science Phase 1 Low Resolution (100 mas)
Launch
200 km
20,000 km
Transfer Stage
23(No Transcript)
24(No Transcript)
25Technical Components Mirror Modules
- Grazing Incidence Mirrors
- Grazing Incidence loosens our surface quality and
figure requirements by 1/sinq - Flatness gt l/100
- Simple shapes like spheres and flats can be
made perfect enough - At grazing angles, mirrors that are diffraction
limited at UV are also diffraction limited at
X-ray wavelengths - Long and Skinny
- Bundled in Pairs to act as Thin Lens
- Thermal/mechanical Stability appropriate to gt
l/100.
26Technical Components Arrays of Optics
- Baselines of gt 100 m required for angular
resolution. - Formation flying a must for distance gt20 m.
- Miniaturization of ALL satellite subsystems to
ease access to space. - S/C Control to 10 mm- using periscope
configuration (metrology to better than 1 mm). - A system spanning from metrology to propulsion
- Individual optic modules are thin lenses with
HUGE fields of view
27Technical Components The detector
- In Silicon, the minimum X-ray event size is 1 mm
- Large CCD arrays possible with fast readout of
small regions. - Pixel size determines the focal length of the
interferometer Fs/qres - 10 mm pixels -gt Focal lengths of 100s to 1000s of
km. - Formation Flying Necessary
- Huge Depth of focus loosens longitudinal control
(meters) - Large array sizes loosen lateral control
(inches). - High angular resolution requirement to resolve a
black hole The Line-Of-Sight Requirement.
28Technical Components Line-of-Sight
- We must know where this telescope points to
10s-100s of nanoarcseconds - Required for ALL microarcsecond imagers
- The individual components need an ACS system good
to only arcseconds (they are thin lenses) - We only ask for relative stability of the LOS-
not absolute astrometry - This is the largest technical hurdle for MAXIM-
particularly as the formation flying tolerance
has been increased to microns
29Using a Super Startracker to align two
spacecraft to a target.
In the simplest concept, a Super Star Tracker
Sees both Reference stars and a beacon on the
other space craft. It should be able to track
relative drift between the reference and the
beacon to 30 microarcseconds- in the case of
MAXIM Pathfinder.
For a number of reasons (proper motion,
aberration of light, faintness of stars,) an
inertial reference may be more appropriate than
guiding on stars. The inertial reference has to
be stable at a fraction of the angular resolution
for hours to a day. This would require an
extremely stable gyroscope (eg GP-B, superfluid
gyroscopes, atomic interferometer gyroscopes).
?o
dX
The basic procedure here, is to align three
points (the detector, the optics, and the target)
so they form a straight line with kinks less
than the angular resolution. The detector and
the optics behave as thin lenses- and we are
basically insensitive to their rotations. We are
sensitive to a displacement from the
Line-of-Sight (eg dX).
?d
30Options to Determine Line-Of-Sight
- All options require beacons and beacon trackers
to know where one s/c is relative to another. - OPTION 1 Track on guide stars
- Use a good wavelength (radio, optical, x-ray)
- Use a good telescope or an interferometer
- OPTION 2 Use an inertial reference
- Use a VERY good gyroscope or accelerometer
- GP-B
31Summary of Key Technical Challenges
- The mirrors and their associated thermal control
are not a tremendous leap away. - Periscope implementation loosens formation
flying tolerance from nm to mm. This makes
formation flying our second most challenging
requirement. - Determination of the line-of-sight alignment of
multiple spacecraft with our target is the most
serious challenge- and MAXIM is not alone with
this.
32Using Stars as a Stable Reference
- A diffraction limited telescope will have a PSF
l/D - If you get N photons, you can centroid a position
to l/D / N1/2 - Nearby stars have mas and mas structure
- Stars move so you need VERY accurate Gimbals
- Parallax (stars _at_500 pc can move up to 40 mas in
a day) - Aberration of Light (as big as 40 mas in a
minute) - Stellar orbits, wobble due to planets
- Other effects
33An Optical Star Tracker
- A reasonable size telescope (lt1m diam.) _at_
optical wavelengths will require 1012 photons to
centroid to 0.1 mas. - Practical limits on centroiding (1/1000) will
need large F numbers - Lack of bright stars requires complicated gimbals
to find guide stars - HST would barely squeak by with 15th mag stars
34MAXIM Pathfinder Overview
http//maxim.gsfc.nasa.gov
- Objectives
- Demonstrate X-ray interferometry in space as
pathfinder to full up MAXIM - Image with 100 micro-arc second resolution using
a 1-2 m baseline - 1000 times improvement on Chandra
- Coronae of nearby stars
- Jets from black holes
- Accretion disks
- Two spacecraft flying in formation
- Telescope spacecraft with all the optics
- 300 micro arc sec pointing control
- 30 micro arc sec knowledge
- Detector spacecraft positioned 50-500 km ?10 m
and laterally aligned ? 2 mm from Telescope
spacecraft to make fringes well matched to
detector pixels - Detector and optics fit within medium class
launch vehicle (e.g., Delta IV H)
Detector Spacecraft
L50-500 km!
Optic Spacecraft
35Key Technologies for MAXIM
- Super Star Tracker
- High efficiency, reliability lasers (eg LISA 10
efficiency, gt 5year life, micron wavelength, 1
watt output power) - High precision, low drift gyroscopes (better than
1 mas/day drift eg. GP-B, superfluid gyroscopes,
atomic interferometer gyroscopes ) - Thermal Mechanically Stable Telescopes (eg Quartz
telescope on GP-B, 0.1-1nm stability over m
long structures) - Low power, light weight, 0.1 arcsecond class
star trackers (eg. N. Clark _at_ Langley 2 watts,
200 gram) - formation flying sensor and initial target
acquisition - Wide dynamic range propulsion (5 orders of
magnitude of thrust down to mN) - PPTs, FEEPS, MEMS microthrusters
- Light weight, flat (2 nm figure) oblong optics.
36Technologies Potentially Useful in Aligning MAXIM
(Super Startracker)
- Thermal/Mechanically stable telescopes with high
speed readouts to monitor the position of
formation flying s/c. - High Reliability, Efficiency Lasers (eg. LISA)
- 10 efficiency, l micron, gt5 year life
- High Precision/Low Drift Gyroscopes Options
- GP-B superconducting gyroscope (0.3 mas/day)
- Superfluid quantum gyroscope (R. Packard Group
at Berkeley, K. Schwab at UMD- now at 100
mas/hour with potential to go to
nanoarcseconds/day) - Atomic interferometer gyroscope (now at 10s of
mas/sec with potential to go to 10
nanoarcseconds/day)
37An Alternate MAXIM Approach Normal incidence,
multilayer coated, aspheric mirrors
- Optics demonstrated today with 1-2 Angstrom
figure - Multilayer Coatings yield narrow bandpass images
in the 19-34 Angstrom range - Could be useful as elements of the prime
interferometer or for alignment - Offers focusing and magnification to design
- May require tighter individual element alignments
and stiffer structures.
38Overview
- Developed new implementation of MAXIM design
which offers - Much looser formation flying tolerances (mm
instead of nm) - Better coverage of the UV plane
- Easier scalability
- Completed a GSFC Instrument Synthesis Analysis
Lab (ISAL) study of a superstar tracker to
address alignment of microarcsecond class
instruments - Completed a GSFC Integrated Mission Design
Center (IMDC) study of a new MAXIM Pathfinder