John Martin - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 7
About This Presentation
Title:

John Martin

Description:

John Martin. May 13-17, 2002. Opening Comments ... Kate Hartman, GSFC Code 490. Webster Cash, Univ of Colorado. Ann Shipley, Univ of Colorado ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:67
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 8
Provided by: davidfe
Category:
Tags: and | john | kate | martin | phillips

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: John Martin


1
Micro Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission, Pathfinder
(MAXIM-PF)
Opening Comments
John Martin May 13-17, 2002
2
IMDC Study Goals
  • Material which can be used as a basis for future
    study by the MAXIM team
  • Each Discipline suggests future studies, building
    on this weeks work
  • It may be only a small step from MAXIM Pathfinder
    for the full MAXIM
  • Determine if it is reasonable to call this a 2015
    launch
  • It is reasonable to do this, pending
    authorization and sufficient money
  • Produce a life-cycle cost estimate
  • Provided both as a grass-roots estimate and a
    parametric estimate
  • Refine the mission profile (e.g., orbit analysis,
    etc.) as contained in the prework and opening
    presentation
  • Concepts for Phase 1 and Phase 2 have been
    augmented and refined
  • Terms Mode 1 and Mode 2 have been used in
    some places, but should be replaced with Phase
    1 and Phase 2 in future work
  • Identify required technology miracles and
    performance drivers
  • Miracles do not appear needed
  • Technology developments needed for MAXIM are same
    as needed for several other future missions

3
These are Included in our Standard Work Package
  • Nice-looking mechanical diagrams, graphs and nice
    sketches showing results of the study
  • Included in the Mechanical presentation and
    supporting files
  • Graphs and other sketches
  • Included in many Discipline presentations
  • Disciplines cover these topics
  • MAXIM requirements that drive the subsystem being
    discussed
  • Subsystem configuration
  • Elements included (could be components, but great
    detail not expected)
  • Mass and cost estimates
  • Technologies required
  • Identify tall poles, if any (technology needed,
    but not likely to be developed without funding or
    other emphasis from MAXIM)
  • Identify items which are high cost in order to
    meet the requirements
  • Tradeoffs performed or dead ends encountered
  • Issues and items for future study
  • Delivery CD-ROM will include all analyses done by
    the IMDC this week
  • This presentation summarizes our work

4
MAXIM Information
  • Following information in the LAI-MAXIM-PF Prework
    folder
  • Prework, dated 10 April 2002 (Prework Report.htm)
  • IMDC kickoff presentation on May 13, 2002 by
    Keith Gendreau (going-in-13may02.ppt)
  • Information presented by Keith Gendreau to the
    IMDC and ISAL team in February 2002
    (PeriscopeDesignMAXIM.ppt)
  • Other background information files
  • Material from recent ISAL studies are also
    available
  • Files are on idcsvr3 in a folder called missions.
    The ISAL studies that apply to LAI-MAXIM-PF are
    LAI Beam Combo (M) and LAI Super Star Tracker. I
    have mapped a network drive on my computer,
    calling it drive N, making it quick and easy to
    refer to these files
  • Our August 1999 MAXIM study is in the misdir
    folder
  • This is a moderately future, (15 yrs to launch)
    study of concepts and approaches design details
    are important, but will probably be changed
    before construction actually begins

5
Other Requested Trades or Studies
  • TDRSS Support vs. direct to ground (for early
    orbit?)
  • TDRSS often used for early orbit support of
    Launch and Early Orbit
  • Use of a TDRSS-like relay from L2 vs. use of DSN
  • TDRSS-like relay must be considered as a
    synergistic requirement by several L2 missions
  • TDRSS development for use at L2 far exceeds DSN
    cost for MAXIM

6
Requested Standard Products
  • Spreadsheets, bullet charts, or other briefly
    stated information useful to support ongoing
    analysis of this potential mission
  • Information in the final presentation is a
    summary of work done by the discipline engineers
  • System mass, power and cost spreadsheets, using
    real data where available and typical data for
    elements lacking specific information
  • Actual values for mass, power and cost are used
    where known
  • Educated estimates used where specific data does
    not extist
  • Cost estimated using both grass-roots and
    parametric estimating methods
  • Files of supporting analysis (e.g., Excel
    spreadsheets)
  • Included on final CD-ROM
  • Power System Sizing
  • Included in Power presentation
  • Mechanical sketches of the detector, hub and
    free-fliers in the launch shroud, in-transit to
    L2,deployed for Phases 1 and 2
  • Included in the Mechanical presentation
  • Additional graphic files included on the CD-ROM

7
Analyses Show MAXIM to be an Advanced, but
Feasible Concept
  • 100-105 Opening - John Martin
  • 105-125 System Gabe Karpati
  • 125-135 Flight Dynamics Steve Cooley
  • 135-145 Mechanical Dave Peters
  • 145-155 Thermal Wes Ousley
  • 155-200 Launch Vehicle Larry Phillips
  • 200-210 Attitude Control Eric Stoneking
  • 210-220 Propulsion Bob Estes
  • 220-230 Power Bob Beaman
  • 230-240 Flight Software Kequan Luu
  • 240-250 Data Systems Ron Vento
  • 250-300 Mission Operations Tim Rykowski
  • 300-310 Mission Success Dick Bolt
  • 310-320 Parametric Cost Analysis Bill Lawson
  • 320-330 Wrap-up - John Martin

8
Study Particulars
  • Name
  • Micro-Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission, Pathfinder
    (MAXIM-PF)
  • MAXIM-PF_Discipline.ext used for discipline file
    names
  • Dates
  • May 13-17, 2002
  • Primary Client Representatives
  • Keith Gendreau, GSFC Code
  • Kate Hartman, GSFC Code 490
  • Webster Cash, Univ of Colorado
  • Ann Shipley, Univ of Colorado
  • Jim Leitch, Ball Aerospace
  • Participants
  • See the file MAXIM-PF_Attendance.xls
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com