Title: The%20Reiter%20Prize%20Lecture
1The Reiter Prize Lecture
January 26, 2005
2Stan Reiter Some Early Papers
Hughes, Jonathan R. T. and Stanley Reiter (1958).
"The First 1,945 British Steamships." Journal of
the American Statistical Association 53(282)
360-381.
Davis, Lance E., Jonathan R. T. Hughes and
Stanley Reiter (1960). "Aspects of Quantitative
Research in Economic History." The Journal of
Economic History 20(4) 539-547.
3The Two Central Inspirations
4Key Idea 1 Evolution is a General Process
- An evolutionary process has three essentials
- Mechanism for introducing variation
- Consistent selection processes and
- Mechanism for preserving and/or propagating the
selected variants
5Key Idea 2 3
What a person cannot do he or she will not do no
matter how strong the urge to do it. (p. 28).
In the face of real-world complexity, the
business firm turns to procedures that find good
enough answers whose best answers are unknowable.
(p. 28).
6Key Idea 2 3
What a firm cannot do it will not do no matter
how strong the incentives to do it.
In the face of real-world complexity, the
business firm develops standard operation
procedures to deal with most decision making
situations.
7Key Idea 4 Collect Historical Data
The evolution of firms and of economies does
not lead to any easily predictable equilibrium,
much less of an optimum, but is a complex
process, probably continuing indefinitely, that
is probably best understood through an
examination of its history. (p. 48).
8Key Idea 5
Many phenomena display a hierarchical
organization
9A Four Level Hierarchy
10Whole
The Global Economy Country Economies Industries
FirmsProducts Services
Parts
11Hierarchy of Selection Processes
It is important to recognize what are selection
criteria at one level are but trials of the
criteria at the next higher, more fundamental,
more encompassing, less frequently invoked level
(Campbell, 1974, p. 421).
12(No Transcript)
13Key Idea 6 Sources of Success
The variation-and-selection-retention model
unequivocally implies that ceteris paribus, the
greater the heterogeneity and volume of trials
the greater the chance of a productive
innovation. ... unconventionality and no doubt
numerosity are a necessary, if not sufficient
condition of creativity. (Campbell, 1960, p.
395).
14The Advisor Richard Nelson
15Why Synthetic Dye Industry? Ernst Homburg
Professor for the History of Technology
16British and French Firms are the Leaders in Dye
Industry in 1862
Market Share
U. S.
Germany
Switzerland
France
Other
Britain
17The Expert Predictions
At no distant dateEngland will be the
greatest colour producing country in the world.
August Wilhelm Hofmann (1863, p. 120) in his
Report on the Chemical Section of the
International Exhibition of 1862
18German Firms are Leaders in the Dye Industry in
1873
Market Share
U. S.
Germany
Switzerland
France
Other
Britain
19German Firms Dominate World Dye Industry in 1913
Market Share
U. S.
Germany
Switzerland
France
Other
Britain
20Concentration in Each Country, 1913
Firm Country Domestic Production Share Global Market Share Sum of Global Share
Bayer Germany 22 20.0 20.0
BASF Germany 22 20.0 40.0
Hoechst Germany 22 20.0 60.0
Levinstein U.K. 30 2.0 62.0
Read Holliday U.K. 30 2.0 64.0
Schoellkopf U.S. 50 1.7 65.7
Heller Merz U.S. 21 0.7 66.4
21Number of Dye Firms by Country, 1857-1914
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
1914
1857
1914
1885
1857
USA
Britain
Germany
Switzerland
France
22Industry Demography 1857-1914
Number of Firm Entries Number of Firm Exits Firm Failure Rates
Germany 116 91 78
France 63 55 87
Britain 47 36 77
United States 35 25 71
Switzerland 23 19 83
23Dye Development at Bayer in 1906
New dye molecules marketed 36
Dye molecules tested on larger scale 60
New dye molecules synthesized 2656
Theoretically possible dye molecules Billions
24Global Share of Organic Chemistry Publications
1852 1862 1877 1907
Germany 29 38 50-67 35-47
France 35 23 15.2 12.2
Britain 24 23 5.9 16.2
United States 0.9 3.6
Switzerland 7.4-24 5.0-17
25German Share of Aromatic Organic Chemistry
Publications cited in France
Papers devoted to aromatics German Share
1864 14 35
1867 38 85
1870 40 96
1874 35 97
26Three Empirical Chapters
Chapter 2 Country-Level Performance
Differences and their Institutional Foundations
27Three Empirical Chapters
Chapter 3 Three times Two Case Studies of
Individual Firms
28Three Empirical Chapters
Chapter 4 The Coevolution of National
Industries and Institutions
29Final Theoretical Chapter
Chapter 5 Toward and Institutional Theory of
Competitive Advantage
30Academic Laggard
Power-Union
Quadrant I
Quadrant II
Quadrant IV
Quadrant III
Union of the Weak
Industrial Laggard
31Explanation of Symbols Used in Illustration
32Organic Chemistry in Different Countries
1855
No synthetic dye industry existed before 1857
Germany
France
Switzerland
United States
Britain
33Co-Evolution in the Synthetic Dye Industry
1860
Germany
France
Switzerland
United States
Britain
34Co-Evolution in the Synthetic Dye Industry
1870
Germany
France
Switzerland
United States
Britain
35Co-Evolution in the Synthetic Dye Industry
1913
Germany
France
Switzerland
United States
Britain
36Co-Evolution Processes at the National Level
Time 1
37Co-Evolution Processes at the National Level
Time 2
38Co-Evolution Processes at the National Level
Time 3
39Co-Evolution Processes at the National Level
Time 4