Model Overview - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Model Overview

Description:

Natural Flow of Tule River is used as wetness indicator ... 215 water will not be allocated when delivery is reduced due to basin wetness ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:23
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: Corre
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Model Overview


1
Model Overview
  • Application of CALSIM II to Friant System

2
CALSIM Development for USJRBI, Phase
IIncorporate Real-time Operational Decision
Logic for Operation of Millerton Lake
  • Water supply allocation based on available water
    supply
  • Class 1, Class 2, and 215 water allocation made
    in March and updated monthly through end of June
  • Monthly use of Class 1 and Class 2 are dynamic
    based on availability of Class 2 and 215 water
  • Flood operation based on seasonal runoff
  • Water supply forecast used in February and
    updated monthly through end of June to target
    filling Millerton by end of June
  • Pre-release for snowmelt runoff are made each
    month from February through May

3
Water Supply Allocation Procedure
Annual Class 1 Allocation
Annual Water Supply Forecast
Annual Class 2 Allocation
Annual Delivery
Monthly Delivery Pattern
Initial Monthly Delivery
Forecasted Snowmelt Release
Monthly Delivery Adjustment
Monthly Delivery
215 Water Allocation
Rain Flood Release
4
Model Validation
  • Compare Model Simulation to Historical Operation
  • Findings
  • Model adequately mimics historical operation
  • Model simulation provides benchmark for
    comparative analysis

5
Model Validation Plots
  • Annual Total Canal Delivery
  • Annual Madera Canal Delivery
  • Annual Friant-Kern Canal Delivery
  • 1952-1961 Monthly Millerton Operation
  • 1952-1961 Monthly Canal Diversions
  • 1962-1971 Monthly Millerton Operation
  • 1962-1971 Monthly Canal Diversions
  • 1972-1981 Monthly Millerton Operation
  • 1972-1981 Monthly Canal Diversions
  • 1982-1991 Monthly Millerton Operation
  • 1982-1991 Monthly Canal Diversions
  • 1992-1994 Monthly Millerton Operation
  • 1992-1994 Monthly Canal Diversions

6
Conclusion
  • Model adequately mimics historical operation
  • Model simulation provides benchmark for
    comparative analysis

7
End
8
Annual Total Canal Delivery
Most differences are explainable
9
Annual Madera Canal Delivery
10
Annual Friant-Kern Canal Delivery
11
Rerouted Flood Flow to Madera Canal Fresno River
12
1952-1961 Monthly Millerton Operation
13
1952-1961 Monthly Canal Diversions
14
1962-1971 Monthly Millerton Operation
15
1962-1971 Monthly Canal Diversions
16
1972-1981 Monthly Millerton Operation
17
1972-1981 Monthly Canal Diversions
18
1982-1991 Monthly Millerton Operation
19
1982-1991 Monthly Canal Diversions
20
1992-1994 Monthly Millerton Operation
21
1992-1994 Monthly Canal Diversions
22
Annual Water Supply Forecast
  • Water Supply Volume Available for Delivery
  • Beginning of Month Storage
  • Inflow (through September)
  • - Canal Loss (through September)
  • - Minimum River Release (through September)
  • - Evaporation Estimate (through September)
  • - Carryover Target (end of September)
  • Updated Monthly From March Through June

23
Annual Class 1 Allocation
  • Minimum of
  • Water Supply Volume Available for Delivery
  • 800,000 AF
  • Updated Monthly From March Through June

24
Annual Class 2 Allocation
  • Minimum of
  • Water Supply Volume Available for Delivery
  • Minus
  • Class 1 Allocation
  • Spill forecast
  • 1,400,000 AF
  • Updated Monthly From March Through June for
    Spills
  • Adjusted for Wetness in Tulare Basin

25
Monthly Delivery Pattern
  • Patterns are developed based on deliveries from
    1982-1997
  • 4 Sets of Monthly Patterns
  • Total Friant-Kern Canal
  • Friant-Kern Canal Class 1
  • Total Madera Canal
  • Madera Canal Class 1
  • CALSIM uses annual delivery allocation to select
    pattern
  • Class 2 Pattern is the Difference Between Total
    and Class 1

26
Historical Total Delivery Pattern
27
Historical Class 1 Delivery Pattern
28
Total Delivery Patterns
29
Class 1 Delivery Patterns
30
Snowmelt Release Forecast
  • Volume of Friant release, above Class 1 and Class
    2, to be made with the target of filling by the
    end of June
  • Spill volume is spread throughout spring, the
    pattern of release is based on spill volume
  • Updated Monthly From February Through June
  • Snowmelt Release Volume
  • March 1 Storage
  • Inflow (through June)
  • - Canal Loss (through June)
  • - Minimum River Release (through June)
  • - Evaporation Estimate (through June)
  • - Maximum Millerton capacity
  • - Canal Delivery

31
Delivery Adjustment
  • Friant-Kern Canal Class 2 delivery is reduced
    based on Tulare Basin wetness
  • Natural Flow of Tule River is used as wetness
    indicator
  • Madera Canal delivery is reduced based on Madera
    Canal service area demands

32
215 Water Allocation
  • Allocation is made only when Friant will spill
    for Rain flood or pre-release for snowmelt
  • 215 water will not be allocated when delivery is
    reduced due to basin wetness
  • 215 demand is 1,200 cfs for Friant-Kern Canal
  • 215 demand is 100 cfs for Madera Canal
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com