Title: GIS Overview
1GIS Overview
2What is GIS?
- GIS (Geographic Information System) computer
information system that can input, store,
manipulate, analyze, and display geographically
referenced (spatial) data to support decision
making processes.
3Tools for a GIS
- Hardware
- Computer
- Printer / Plotter
- Digitizer
- Scanner
- GIS Desktop Software (ESRI, Inc. ArcView)
- CAD Software (AutoDesk - AutoCAD)
- Multimedia (Photos, Video, 3D Models)
- World Wide Web (ESRI, Inc. ARCIMS)
- Personnel
4GIS Data Sources
- Digitized and Scanned Maps
- purchased, donated, free (Internet)
- created by user
- Data Bases Tables of data
- GPS Global Positioning System
- accurate locations
- Field Sampling of Attributes
- Remote Sensing Aerial Photography
5Conventional Information Systems
- Answer the following questions
- Who ?
- What ?
- When ?
- Why ?
- How ?
6GIS answers the following
- Location What is at...?
- Condition Where is it?
- Trends What has changed since...?
- Patterns What spatial patterns exist?
- Modeling What if?
- Exploring data using GIS turns data into
information into knowledge
7Data Data Data
- Location Data How Many? What Kind? Where?
- Scale of Data Global to Local
- Data Presentation
- Words, Charts, Graphs, Tables, Maps,
Photos
8Databases
9Visualizing Data
- A picture is worth a thousand words
10GIS Data
- Raster Images - grids
- pixels
- a location and value
- satellite images and aerial photos
- Vector - grids
- Features points, lines polygons
- Attributes size, type, length, etc.
11Layers of GIS Information
Municipalities
12Layers of GIS Information
Census Tracts
13Layers of GIS Information
Lakes and Rivers
14Layers of GIS Information
Polluting Companies
15Layers of GIS Information
Schools
16Maps and Databases are Interactive
17GIS Connects Graphics to Data
18Maps and Databases are Interactive
19Queries and Restrictions
20GIS Turns Data into Information
- A picture is worth a thousand words
21GIS Analyzes Information
22GIS Examples
23World and Country Level
24(No Transcript)
25(No Transcript)
26(No Transcript)
27State Level
28(No Transcript)
29(No Transcript)
30(No Transcript)
31(No Transcript)
32Township Level
33(No Transcript)
34(No Transcript)
35(No Transcript)
36(No Transcript)
37(No Transcript)
38Conclusions
- State level analysis results indicated
Transylvania County as the high risk area in
terms of number of children per each HSDS, - County level analysis results indicated Brevard
Township as the high risk area in terms of
combined effect of young population density and
HSDS density, - Township level analysis results indicated
- 4 different HSDS located at the southern region
of Brevard Township as potential risk-producing
areas, - 2 public schools within 10 minute walking
distance buffer of previously detected HSDS, - 4 public water supply sources (PWSS) two of which
may supply water to public schools and daycare
centers, - A total of 2,593 people living within 10 minute
walking distance of specified HSDS, and total of
506 people (between the ages of 0 and 17) within
the same distance.
39Obesity Research
- Objectives
- To evaluate if the degree of pediatric obesity,
assessed by BMI Z scores, is related to proximity
to fast food restaurants or distance from parks. - To determine if the effectiveness of treatment of
obesity is related to the following age, gender,
race/ethnicity, number of follow up visits, and
proximity to the treatment center. - Design/Methods
- Patient addresses (n1,014) were mapped with
GIS, and then overlaid with parks, fast food
locations, and additional layers including
socioeconomic, political, school, and
neighborhood districts. - Distance buffers from the WMWC were created and
overlaid with patient addresses and BMI Z score
changes following treatment.
40Travel Distances Z Score Change (-.5 to -2.16),
Total 38
Results
Proximity to the center was unrelated to success
in BMI decreases
Travel Distances Z Score Change (.5 to 2.81)
Total 8
41Results
- Of patients with moderate BMI decrease (Z score
change gt -0.5), 43.7 live within 600 feet of a
park and 56.3 farther than - 1200 feet. Mean distance to fast food is 1.1
miles. - Of patients with moderate BMI increases (Z score
change gt 0.5), 16.7 live within 600 feet of a
park and 83.3 farther than 1200 feet. Mean
distance from fast food is .8 miles.
Patient Locations Compared to Fast Food and Parks
42Property Value and Street Trees
- An Analysis of the City of Pittsburgh
Neighborhoods, 2009
43City of Pittsburgh NeighborhoodsResidential
Sales, 2009
Average Sale Price by Neighborhood
Note white areas indicate no sales Source
Allegheny County
44City of Pittsburgh Neighborhoods and Street
Trees, 2009
Number of Trees per Neighborhood
Source Friends of the Pittsburgh Urban Forest
45Property Sales Compared to Number of Trees per
Block
46A High Risk Poverty Index
- Geospatial Analysis Methods for the
Greater Pittsburgh
Community Food Bank
Heinz College School of Public Policy
Management Brandon C. Loughery, MAM Kristen
Kurland, Faculty Advisor Larry Hokaj, Chief
Technology Officer GPCFM Spring 2009
47Introduction
- There are three project objectives
- Provide background information to use additional
geospatial information systems (GIS) technology
for evaluation and predictive processes - Gain a more thorough understanding of the
communities GPCFB serves. - Create and implement a delimited index to help
identify populations that need the Food Banks
services the most.
48Poverty Variables
- Householders in renter-occupied housing with
income below the poverty level who receive public
assistance income - Total number of the youth population 18 years and
younger, by block group, who live at or below the
poverty line - Total number of elderly population 65 years and
older, by block group, who live at or below the
poverty line - Total number of families, by block group, who
have a female household head (no husband present)
with related children under 18 years of age - The number of elderly population 65 years and
older with income below the poverty level and a
disability - Total number of families who have a female
household head (no husband present) where the
household head worked full-time, year round in
1999 and lived below the poverty level - The total number of adults over the age of 18
with no high school diploma - The variables are taken directly from the Sample
File 3 (SF 3) sample population data from the
U.S. Census.
49High Risk Poverty Areas
Contour Line 9
Low Risk Medium Risk
High Risk
50GPCFB Program Locations and High Risk Poverty
Areas
Low Risk Medium Risk
High Risk
51FIGURE 3 Buffer Zone around High Risk Poverty
Areas
1,500 Buffer Zone
Low Risk Medium Risk
High Risk
52TABLE 1 Total High Risk GPCFB Member Agencies
(Raster Value of 12)
53TABLE 2 Total Low Risk GPCFB Member Agency
(Raster Value of 1)
54TABLE 3 Variable Data Summary
Risk Factor Sum Mean Standard Deviation
Householders in renter-occupied housing with income below the poverty level who receive public assistance income 4,329 23.92 34.53
Total number of the youth population 18 years and younger, by block group, who live at or below the poverty line 81,713 200.28 141.32
Total number of elderly population 65 years and older, by block group, who live at or below the poverty line 65,843 161.38 100.16
Total number of families, by block group, who have a female household head (no husband present) with related children under 18 years of age 7558 18.52 39.15
The number of elderly population 65 years and older with income below the poverty level and a disability 4,590 25.36 23.53
Total number of families who have a female household head (no husband present) where the household head worked full-time, year round in 1999 and lived below the poverty level 886 4.90 9.19
The total number of adults over the age of 18 with no high school diploma 47,533 262.61 197.90
55High Risk Poverty Index Results by Neighborhood
56ESRI
- To learn more, visit
- http//www.esri.com/industries.html