GIS Overview - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

GIS Overview

Description:

GIS Course ... GIS Overview – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:210
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 57
Provided by: TheH73
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: GIS Overview


1
GIS Overview
2
What is GIS?
  • GIS (Geographic Information System) computer
    information system that can input, store,
    manipulate, analyze, and display geographically
    referenced (spatial) data to support decision
    making processes.

3
Tools for a GIS
  • Hardware
  • Computer
  • Printer / Plotter
  • Digitizer
  • Scanner
  • GIS Desktop Software (ESRI, Inc. ArcView)
  • CAD Software (AutoDesk - AutoCAD)
  • Multimedia (Photos, Video, 3D Models)
  • World Wide Web (ESRI, Inc. ARCIMS)
  • Personnel

4
GIS Data Sources
  • Digitized and Scanned Maps
  • purchased, donated, free (Internet)
  • created by user
  • Data Bases Tables of data
  • GPS Global Positioning System
  • accurate locations
  • Field Sampling of Attributes
  • Remote Sensing Aerial Photography

5
Conventional Information Systems
  • Answer the following questions
  • Who ?
  • What ?
  • When ?
  • Why ?
  • How ?

6
GIS answers the following
  • Location What is at...?
  • Condition Where is it?
  • Trends What has changed since...?
  • Patterns What spatial patterns exist?
  • Modeling What if?
  • Exploring data using GIS turns data into
    information into knowledge

7
Data Data Data
  • Location Data How Many? What Kind? Where?
  • Scale of Data Global to Local
  • Data Presentation
  • Words, Charts, Graphs, Tables, Maps,
    Photos

8
Databases
  • Not easy to interpret

9
Visualizing Data
  • A picture is worth a thousand words

10
GIS Data
  • Raster Images - grids
  • pixels
  • a location and value
  • satellite images and aerial photos
  • Vector - grids
  • Features points, lines polygons
  • Attributes size, type, length, etc.

11
Layers of GIS Information
Municipalities
12
Layers of GIS Information
Census Tracts
13
Layers of GIS Information
Lakes and Rivers
14
Layers of GIS Information
Polluting Companies
15
Layers of GIS Information
Schools
16
Maps and Databases are Interactive
17
GIS Connects Graphics to Data
18
Maps and Databases are Interactive
19
Queries and Restrictions
20
GIS Turns Data into Information
  • A picture is worth a thousand words

21
GIS Analyzes Information
22
GIS Examples
23
World and Country Level
24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
27
State Level
28
(No Transcript)
29
(No Transcript)
30
(No Transcript)
31
(No Transcript)
32
Township Level
33
(No Transcript)
34
(No Transcript)
35
(No Transcript)
36
(No Transcript)
37
(No Transcript)
38
Conclusions
  • State level analysis results indicated
    Transylvania County as the high risk area in
    terms of number of children per each HSDS,
  • County level analysis results indicated Brevard
    Township as the high risk area in terms of
    combined effect of young population density and
    HSDS density,
  • Township level analysis results indicated
  • 4 different HSDS located at the southern region
    of Brevard Township as potential risk-producing
    areas,
  • 2 public schools within 10 minute walking
    distance buffer of previously detected HSDS,
  • 4 public water supply sources (PWSS) two of which
    may supply water to public schools and daycare
    centers,
  • A total of 2,593 people living within 10 minute
    walking distance of specified HSDS, and total of
    506 people (between the ages of 0 and 17) within
    the same distance.

39
Obesity Research
  • Objectives
  • To evaluate if the degree of pediatric obesity,
    assessed by BMI Z scores, is related to proximity
    to fast food restaurants or distance from parks.
  • To determine if the effectiveness of treatment of
    obesity is related to the following age, gender,
    race/ethnicity, number of follow up visits, and
    proximity to the treatment center.
  • Design/Methods
  • Patient addresses (n1,014) were mapped with
    GIS, and then overlaid with parks, fast food
    locations, and additional layers including
    socioeconomic, political, school, and
    neighborhood districts.
  • Distance buffers from the WMWC were created and
    overlaid with patient addresses and BMI Z score
    changes following treatment.

40
Travel Distances Z Score Change (-.5 to -2.16),
Total 38
Results
Proximity to the center was unrelated to success
in BMI decreases
Travel Distances Z Score Change (.5 to 2.81)
Total 8
41
Results
  • Of patients with moderate BMI decrease (Z score
    change gt -0.5), 43.7 live within 600 feet of a
    park and 56.3 farther than
  • 1200 feet. Mean distance to fast food is 1.1
    miles.
  • Of patients with moderate BMI increases (Z score
    change gt 0.5), 16.7 live within 600 feet of a
    park and 83.3 farther than 1200 feet. Mean
    distance from fast food is .8 miles.

Patient Locations Compared to Fast Food and Parks
42
Property Value and Street Trees
  • An Analysis of the City of Pittsburgh
    Neighborhoods, 2009

43
City of Pittsburgh NeighborhoodsResidential
Sales, 2009
Average Sale Price by Neighborhood
Note white areas indicate no sales Source
Allegheny County
44
City of Pittsburgh Neighborhoods and Street
Trees, 2009
Number of Trees per Neighborhood
Source Friends of the Pittsburgh Urban Forest
45
Property Sales Compared to Number of Trees per
Block
46
A High Risk Poverty Index
  • Geospatial Analysis Methods for the
    Greater Pittsburgh
    Community Food Bank

Heinz College School of Public Policy
Management Brandon C. Loughery, MAM Kristen
Kurland, Faculty Advisor Larry Hokaj, Chief
Technology Officer GPCFM Spring 2009
47
Introduction
  • There are three project objectives
  • Provide background information to use additional
    geospatial information systems (GIS) technology
    for evaluation and predictive processes
  • Gain a more thorough understanding of the
    communities GPCFB serves.
  • Create and implement a delimited index to help
    identify populations that need the Food Banks
    services the most.

48
Poverty Variables
  • Householders in renter-occupied housing with
    income below the poverty level who receive public
    assistance income
  • Total number of the youth population 18 years and
    younger, by block group, who live at or below the
    poverty line
  • Total number of elderly population 65 years and
    older, by block group, who live at or below the
    poverty line
  • Total number of families, by block group, who
    have a female household head (no husband present)
    with related children under 18 years of age
  • The number of elderly population 65 years and
    older with income below the poverty level and a
    disability
  • Total number of families who have a female
    household head (no husband present) where the
    household head worked full-time, year round in
    1999 and lived below the poverty level
  • The total number of adults over the age of 18
    with no high school diploma
  • The variables are taken directly from the Sample
    File 3 (SF 3) sample population data from the
    U.S. Census.

49
High Risk Poverty Areas
Contour Line 9
Low Risk Medium Risk
High Risk
50
GPCFB Program Locations and High Risk Poverty
Areas
Low Risk Medium Risk
High Risk
51
FIGURE 3 Buffer Zone around High Risk Poverty
Areas
1,500 Buffer Zone
Low Risk Medium Risk
High Risk
52
TABLE 1 Total High Risk GPCFB Member Agencies
(Raster Value of 12)
53
TABLE 2 Total Low Risk GPCFB Member Agency
(Raster Value of 1)
54
TABLE 3 Variable Data Summary
Risk Factor Sum Mean Standard Deviation
Householders in renter-occupied housing with income below the poverty level who receive public assistance income 4,329 23.92 34.53
Total number of the youth population 18 years and younger, by block group, who live at or below the poverty line 81,713 200.28 141.32
Total number of elderly population 65 years and older, by block group, who live at or below the poverty line 65,843 161.38 100.16
Total number of families, by block group, who have a female household head (no husband present) with related children under 18 years of age 7558 18.52 39.15
The number of elderly population 65 years and older with income below the poverty level and a disability 4,590 25.36 23.53
Total number of families who have a female household head (no husband present) where the household head worked full-time, year round in 1999 and lived below the poverty level 886 4.90 9.19
The total number of adults over the age of 18 with no high school diploma 47,533 262.61 197.90
55
High Risk Poverty Index Results by Neighborhood
56
ESRI
  • To learn more, visit
  • http//www.esri.com/industries.html
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com