Stormwater Maintenance and Replacement Program - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 40
About This Presentation
Title:

Stormwater Maintenance and Replacement Program

Description:

Cave Repair. Inlet. Maintenance & Service. In most cases ... First Stage Repairs to Cave-ins. Use of In-mate Crews. Use of Project Levels to Sort Backlog ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:24
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 41
Provided by: ramath1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Stormwater Maintenance and Replacement Program


1
Stormwater Maintenance and Replacement Program
  • November 21, 2006
  • Patricia Biegler, P.E.
  • Richard Broad, P.E.

2
Background
2006
2001
August 2000
Fee
1.75/ERU/Month
2.55/ERU/Month
2.55/ERU/Month
1,000 miles
275 miles
Pipe
1,100 miles
2,500 miles
1,320 miles
Public Ditch
2,700 miles
Documented Citizen Calls
2,999
7,475
11,397
Projected Ditch Clearing Level of Service
5 7 Years
10 15 Years
10 15 Years
Ditch Cleaned
90 miles

36 miles
Backlogged Cave-Ins
600

1,000
Using Streets Crews Temps Not Available
3
Current Funding FY 06-07
TOTAL
CAPITAL
OPERATING
1.3 M
3.3 M
Stormwater Fee
4.6 M
-
1.8 M
Drainage (General Fund Roughly 40 from State
Maintenance)
1.8 M
1.3 M
5.1 M
TOTALS
6.4 M
Pro-rata Grants General Fund
State Maintenance
Other Funding Sources
4
Stormwater Program Components
  • Environmental
  • Permitting and Water Quality
  • Inspections
  • Maintenance
  • Ditches, Pipes, Lakes, Curbs Gutters,
    Structures
  • Emergency Response
  • Capital Needs
  • Provide Flooding Protection
  • Improve Level of Protection
  • Neighborhood Appearance

Yellow
Red
Red
5
Issues
  • Loss of Capital Buying Power
  • Fee Increase in 2000 of 0.85/month/ERU
  • Increased Regulatory Requirements
  • Testing, Inspection Enforcement
  • Wetlands Permitting
  • Operating Increase
  • Salaries Fringes
  • Materials
  • Contracts
  • Debris Hauling Disposal
  • Transportation of Debris
  • Property Issues
  • Land Values
  • Easements
  • Access
  • Encroachments

6
Maintenance Requirements
Ditch Cleaning/Debris Vegetation Ditch
Regrading Erosion Control Ditch Widening
TV Pipe Pipe Resetting Pipe Washing Cave Repair
Curb Gutter
Inlet
Driveway Pipes, Culverts, etc.
Lake
Pipe
Ditch
Outfall Natural Waterway
Streetsweeping Cleaning Inlets Structures
Pipe Washing Cave Repair
Lake Maintenance Dredging Blockage
Removals Fish Kills Erosion Control
Pipe Resetting Pipe Washing Pipe Culvert
Installation
7
Maintenance Service
  • In most cases Vegetation is a minor issue.
  • Real Problems are
  • Collapsed Pipes
  • Undersized Pipes
  • Off-Grade Pipes
  • Undersized Ditches
  • Undersized Culverts
  • Off-Grade Ditches

8
What it takes to fix Annual Additional Funding
Needs
Current Funding
Total
Yellow
0.4 M
0.55 M
150,000
Yellow
7.75 M
4.7M
3,130,000
Red
7.64 M
1.3M
Red
6,260,000
15.94 M
9,540,000
Includes drainage funding
- Addresses only current backlogs priorities
9
Environmental Program
10
ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM Successes
  • Nationally Recognized Education Program
  • HRPDC Partnering of Hampton Roads Cities for
    Environmental Education
  • Public BMP/Lake Inspections
  • Annual Reports to DEQ
  • Illicit Discharge Investigations Partner with
    Fire Department
  • Organized City-wide Erosion Sediment Control
    Inspections
  • Amended City Ordinance to Include Fines for
    Erosion Sediment Control

11
ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM Current Challenges Needs
12
ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM Future Challenges
  • DCR is Taking Over Management of Stormwater
    Permitting from DEQ
  • DCR is Pushing for Large Increases in Water
    Quality Monitoring Reporting ???
  • City Currently Negotiating Renewal of its
    Stormwater Permit with DCR

13
Maintenance Service
14
Maintenance ServiceSuccesses
  • In Spite of Limited Resources More Effective
  • Equipment
  • Skills for Each Job
  • Emergency Response
  • Detailed Plans Developed for Known Choke Points
  • More Investigation Up Front to Eliminate Wasted
    Work Effort Stop and Start
  • Better Defined Work Methods to Include Surveying
  • First Stage Repairs to Cave-ins
  • Use of In-mate Crews
  • Use of Project Levels to Sort Backlog

15
Identified Needs - Maintenance
16
Cave-Ins
  • Cave-Ins FY 04-05
  • 1,088 Cave-In Repair Requests
  • - 496 Repaired by City Crews (124/Crew/Year)
  • - 125 Repaired by Contract (621,000)
  • 467 Added to the existing backlog
  • Current Backlog over 1,000 Cave-Ins

17
Excavation Requirements
18
Cave-Ins
  • Best Approach
  • Less than 6 Deep In-House Crew Repair
  • Over 6 Deep Contract
  • Roughly 50/50 Deep vs. Shallow
  • Stepwise Approach
  • First Stage Repair
  • Letter to Resident
  • Follow up Repairs as Needed

19
Capital Program
20
Capital Projects
  • Funding has slipped from 2.6 million in 2001 to
    1.3 million in 2006
  • Construction cost increases have outpaced overall
    inflation rate (greater than 10/yr)
  • Backlog of needed capital projects exceeds 76
    million
  • These projects improve drainage for large number
    of residents

21
Identified Annual Needs Capital Program
22
Other Items of Concern - Capital
  • Watershed Studies/Inventory - 250,000/year
  • 52 watersheds
  • Lake Maintenance -
  • 350 subdivision lakes
  • For most owners responsible for maintenance
  • Cost for dredging very high
  • Past practice was to share cost
  • Regulatory issue may become ours by default
  • Start saving now? Consultant recommends
    250,000/year

23
Options
24
Stormwater Fee Comparison FY-06/07 Per ERU / Month
Portsmouth scheduled for 50 cent per year
increase. Norfolk scheduled for annual
inflationary increase
25
Fee Comparison
26
Funding Per Mile of Pipe Ditch FY06/07
27
Consultant Report
  • Completed on November 10, 2006
  • Identified Three Levels of Service (LOS) with
    Associated Fee Recommendations
  • Use 5 Year Average FY 2008-2012
  • Current LOS
  • Minimum Regulatory LOS Recommended
  • Citizens Expectation LOS

28
Consultant Report - Continued
  • Current Level of Service (LOS)
  • Avg Need 5.5 million/year from the stormwater
    fee which equals 2.87/ERU/Month
  • With High for 2012 of 6.3 million or
    3.19/ERU/Month
  • To Meet Minimum Regulatory Requirements
    Recommended Level
  • Average need of 10.6M/year or 5.50/ERU/Month
  • With High for 2012 of 11.9M or 6.05 / ERU/Month
  • Citizens Expectation LOS
  • Average need of 13.9M or 7.22/ERU/Month
  • With High for 2012 of 16M or 8.10/ERU/Month

29
Option 1
30
Option 2
31
Consultant Report Minimum Regulatory
32
Consultant Report Citizen Expectations
33
Comparison of Revenue
8.1 M
5.1 M
4.8 M
5 M
2.2 M
2.3 M
2.1 M
Dollars (Millions) Adjusted for Inflation
34
(No Transcript)
35
Impact of Annual Fees
36
Next Steps
  • Meet with Chamber other stakeholders
  • Advertise public hearing 2 weeks in a row
    before hearing
  • Hold non-planning public hearing _at_ City Council
    meeting
  • Council action same night
  • Revise billing information January to March,
    2007
  • Bills mailed in April for CY-2007

37
StormwaterCommittee ChairmanMr. Adam Jack
38
Questions?
39
BackupMaterial
40
Impact on Funding Per Mile
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com