The toulmin Model of Rhetorical Argument - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

The toulmin Model of Rhetorical Argument

Description:

Toulmin has taught at the University of Southern California since 1993, giving ... from the classical, Platonic absolutism, which was part of Plato's formal logic. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:107
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: patt165
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The toulmin Model of Rhetorical Argument


1
The toulmin Model of Rhetorical Argument
  • Building on the Classical Argument
  • P.A. McCabe-Remmell
  • Department of English
  • University of South Florida

2
Stephen E. Toulmin
  • Stephen Edelston Toulmin is a philosopher and
    rhetorical theorist. He was born in England in
    1922 and received his Bachelors degree at Kings
    College. After World War II he obtained his
    Master of Arts and Doctor of Philosophy degrees
    from Cambridge.

3
Toulmin cont.
  • Toulmin has taught at the University of Southern
    California since 1993, giving the Jefferson
    Lecture for the National Endowment for the
    Humanities in 1997.
  • In 1958, Toulmin offered a theory of argument
    that differed from the classical, Platonic
    absolutism, which was part of Platos formal
    logic. Toulmin believed that some aspects of
    rhetoric were relative and not rigidly absolute.

4
Toulmins Model
  • Toulmins model provides that there are three
    essential aspects to rhetorical argument

Claim
Data
Warrant
5
Toulmins Model, cont.
  • Simply
  • A Claim is made.
  • Data is provided in the form of supporting facts.
  • The Warrant connects the Data to the Claim.
  • For example

6
Toulmins Model cont.
  • I am an American. (Claim)
  • I was born in New York State. (Data)
  • Anyone born in New York State is a legal American
    citizen. (Warrant)
  • Toulmin says that the Claim and the Data cannot
    hold without a sufficiently strong Warrant , or,
    the weakest argument is the one with the weakest
    warrant.

7
Toulmins Model cont.
  • Toulmin also identified other parts to an
    argument.

Qualifier
Rebuttal
Backing
8
Toulmins Model cont.
  • While the Claim, the Data and the Warrant are
    essential parts to an argument, the Qualifier,
    the Backing and the Rebuttal are not.
  • The Qualifier states the strength of the claim.
    In our sample argument about American citizens, a
    Qualifier might be Some Americans are not born
    in the United States. These are naturalized
    citizens.

9
Toulmins Model cont.
  • The Rebuttal is an exception to the claim and
    considers counter-arguments much like the
    Classical model.
  • The Backing provides extra strength to the
    Warrant, especially if the Warrant is not widely
    accepted or understood. The Backing defends the
    Warrant.

10
Toulmins Model cont.
  • Arranged in graphic format, the Toulmin Model
    looks like this

11
Conclusion
  • Toulmin developed this model so scholars and
    rhetoricians (including public speakers and
    members of the legal community) could analyze
    arguments easily.
  • If one can identify different parts of the
    argument one can compare claims, data, warrants,
    etc., in order to establish one arguments
    validity over another or if two arguments are
    equally valid. Try identifying each aspect of
    Toulmins model in your own work!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com