Title: ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCE March 13, 2003
1Presented at the Advisory Committee for
Pharmaceutical Science meeting on March 13,
2003 by Helen Winkle
2ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR PHARMACEUTICAL
SCIENCEMarch 13, 2003
- DRUG PRODUCT QUALITY
- Pharmaceutical cGMPs for the 21st Century
3Goals of Drug Quality Initiative
- Incorporate concepts of risk management and
quality systems - Include latest scientific advances in
manufacturing and technology - Better integrate the review program with the
inspection program - Ensure consistency in standards
- Encourage for innovation in manufacturing
- Focus resources effectively to address most
significant health risks
4Overview
- Applies to pharmaceuticals, biological human
drugs and veterinary drugs - Focus is on review of drug product applications
and inspection of manufacturing facilities - Initiative being coordinated through steering
committee with members from ORA, CBER, CVM, CDER,
OC and input from CDRH and CFSAN - Initiative will take two years
- Already provided six month report - 2/20
5Using state-of-the-art approaches to our review
and inspection processes means getting important
new medications to patients fasterFDA will
focus our attention and resources on the areas of
greatest risk, with the goal of maximizing public
health protection without impeding innovation
Mark McClellan, MD
6Task Groups
7Contracts Management
- Expedite external studies of key issues to be
addressed under the initiative - Looking at two areas
- Effective Quality Systems Practices
- cGMP and Other Product Quality Assurance
Methodology - Other areas of support for initiative
8International
- Important to have harmonized approaches to
assuring drug product quality - Work with ICH specifically in the realm of
technological advances - Look at other forums for harmonization
- Benchmark with other country systems
9Part 11
- Clarify the scope of FDAs electronic
recordkeeping requirements - Provide for enforcement discretion in the areas
where interpretation is unclear - Withdrawal draft guidance (2/4)
- Webcast
- Amend 21 CFR Part 11 Rule and Preamble
10Dispute Resolution
- Develop consistent policies and procedures for
resolving scientific and technical cGMP issues - between regulated industry and the FDA
- between components within FDA
11483 Communications
- Honing language to communicate deficiencies
observed during cGMP inspections - Combined with Dispute Resolution
12Warning Letter
- Launching a program to identify any
inconsistencies across program areas with respect
to all drug cGMP warning letters
13Manufacturing Science
- Ensure high efficiency and quality of
pharmaceutical manufacturing and associated
regulatory processes - Facilitate introduction of modern manufacturing
technologies and systems - Enhance FDA expertise in pharmaceutical
engineering and technologies - PAT initiative
14Changes Without Prior Review
- Identify opportunities to allow post approval
manufacturing changes without FDA review and
approval prior to implementation - Comparability protocol
- Discussed yesterday
15Risk Management Workplanning
- Ensuring systematic risk management approaches
- Implement risk-based approaches that focus both
industry and FDA attention on critical areas - Recent reorganization of CDERs Office of
Compliance
16Pharmaceutical Inspectorate
- Enhance the Agencys expertise in pharmaceutical
technologies - Ensure state-of-the-art pharmaceutical science
- Hire staff that has needed expertise
- Establish a closer working relationship between
field and centers
17Product Specialist
- Develop highly trained FDA product specialists to
help in strengthening consistency in regulatory
decisions and ensure submission reviews and cGMP
inspections are coordinated and synergistic
18Team Biologics Operations
- This initiative had already been started
- Improve operations of Team Biologics building on
implementation of quality management system - CDER/CBER consolidation will affect how some of
Team Biologics is handled
19Quality Systems
- Looking at both internal and external quality
systems - Improve both review and inspectional processes
through implementing quality systems approach - Look at regulation
20Training
- Affects all areas
- Still being developed but expect extensive
training program both for internal and external
21Evaluation
- Extremely important part of the initiative
- Must develop appropriate metrics and mechanism
for evaluation of the total initiative
22Next Steps
- Workshop - April 22-24
- Possible vetting of manufacturing science
questions before advisory committee - Several draft guidances to issue for public
comment - Comparability protocol
- Dispute resolution
- Additional workshops to focus on science
- Part 11 clarification