Dia 1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Dia 1

Description:

Equilibrium. restore balance between expenses and income. Contribution of WRO to ... The polluter pays principle. The cost recovery principle. The solidarity principle ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:31
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: lutg
Category:
Tags: dia | polluter

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Dia 1


1
(No Transcript)
2
  • Equilibrium
  • restore balance between expenses and income
  • Contribution of WRO to the project market
  • at the FLAPP final conference
  • Zaragoza
  • June 13 and 14
  • 2007
  • Waterboard Roer en Overmaas (WRO)
  • Sittard
  • The Netherlands
  • Drs. J.H.J. Lutgens RA RI

3
LOGO EAST ProgrammeVNG International and
Ministry of Foreign affairs
  • Focus of LOGO East projects
  • Strengthening the capacity of regional and local
    governments of Romania, Turkey,Ukraine,Serbia and
    Montenegro by the end 2007.
  • Increasing the number and quality of partnerships
    between regional and local governments in the
    Netherlands and Romania, Turkey,Ukraine, Serbia
    and Montenegro by the end of 2007

4
LOGO East Equilibrium project partners
  • Waterboard Roer and Overmaas
  • (WRO)
  • Mr. Ing. Jac in den Kleef, deputy director
  • Mr. Drs. Hans Lutgens, chartered
    accountant/concerncontroller
  • Waterboard Tranz Tisza Region Environment and
    Water
  • (TTREW)
  • Mr. Maszlo Kothay, general director
  • Mr. Dr. Sabolcz Toth, chief legal department
  • Waterboard Somes Tisa Water Division
  • (STWD)
  • Mr. Marius Minzat, general director
  • Mr. Aurel Filip, financial director

5
Cooperation among Dutch , Hungarian and Romanian
Waterboard
  • Problem
  • In the near future the Romanian Waterboard will
    have
  • no sufficient durable income to maintain dykes in
  • a proper condition to prevent flood.
  • Fixed solution
  • Create durable income ? taxes.
  • Project objective
  • Design an applicable blueprint of a tax system
    for the
  • Romanian Waterboard based on the best practices
    in
  • The Netherlands (decentralized tax system) and in
  • Hungary (centralized tax system).

6
Project approach
7
The Netherlands
WRO ?
8
Netherlands the drain of Europe
  • 25 below sea level
  • gt50 overflow without dykes, dams and embankments
  • Fighting water
  • Polders, dykes, pumps
  • Amersfoort at Sea
  • Inconveniences of waterPolders below sea level

WRO?
9
Hansje Brinker
10
Deltawerken
11
The Prof. Dr. Ir. P. Vellinga ReportSprint to
2015
  • Summary (1)
  • More than 50 of the existing sea and river
    protection system does not comply with the
    protection standards (1960)
  • 2008 2015 necessary additional investments
    3,2 billion.
  • Actual developments
  • rise of sea level (climat change)
  • economic growth
  • indicate that additional investments are
    necessary during 2015 -2025 9 billion to
    become compliant with the actual standards.?
    Formula of Van Danzig and Eijgenraam(2005/2006).

12
The Prof. Dr. Ir. P. Vellinga ReportSprint to
2015
  • Summary (2)
  • Van Danzig and Eijgenraam formula
  • Reduction in p(flood) X (damage and
    losses)
  • equals
  • necessary expenses to reduce prabability
  • Financing investments and maintenance by
  • Central government
  • Local Government (waterboards)
  • Privat financing

13
The Prof. Dr. Ir. P. Vellinga ReportSprint to
2015
  • Evaluation of financing alternatives
  • Evaluation viewpoints
  • Effectiveness
  • Efficiency
  • Justice
  • Sustainability
  • Score
  • Central government 6.3
  • Local Government 7.1 ?
  • Privat 5.9

14
Evaluation grid tax systems (1)
  • Viewpoints
  • The benefit Principle
  • The polluter pays principle
  • The cost recovery principle
  • The solidarity principle
  • The legality principle
  • The social principle
  • The stability principle
  • Others
  • Complexity
  • Democratic
  • Transparancy
  • Robust
  • Costs

15
Evaluation grid tax systems (2)
  • Comparison
  • central government tax system
  • ( Hungary)
  • versus
  • local government
  • tax system
  • ( The Netherlands)
  • And the winner is

16
The local tax system
  • Most important argumentation
  • I. Most important and almost only mission of
    Waterboards flood protection
  • reliable and durable financing of all necessary
    investments and maintenance costs
  • no competition in allocating funds.
  • II. The local tax system is more democratic than
    the centralized tax system.
  • Conclusion
  • Best tax practice ? the Local waterboard tax
    system.

17
(No Transcript)
18
Applicability of the Dutch Tax system
  • Lutgens Policy Hypothesis ?
  • Poster
  • Countries is transition (like Romania) will step
    by step implement the decentralized tax system.
  • More democratic
  • Ensure financing necessary maintenance and
    investments
  • Projects results will be applicable worldwide

19
Summer 2006
20
(No Transcript)
21
Grashoppers message to all the Equilibrium
projectmembers
  • Create happy taxpayers

22
Discussion
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com