EPICS Limitations - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

EPICS Limitations

Description:

Many people could and should add the limitations that they encounter to this. ... are at least two instances of data silo for getting synch data but not in the ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:13
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: bobda6
Learn more at: https://epics.anl.gov
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: EPICS Limitations


1
EPICS Limitations
  • Bob Dalesio
  • Marty Kraimer

2
Limited view point
  • These slides are written from a limited
    perspective
  • Many people could and should add the limitations
    that they encounter to this.
  • It is a collaboration and that is an invitation
    to voice what is wrong (and volunteer to fix some
    of it)

3
There is no device abstraction in the database
  • What are devices?
  • Power Supplies w Magnets
  • Scope
  • What are the properties
  • multiple inputs and commands
  • states taking data, ramping, turning off
  • multiple status bits over temp, on/off etc.
  • Does each command and status become a channel
  • Does the value / status fit the command / state
    model
  • Does a device use channels for interfaces to hw
  • Does a device disallow control of output channels
    it use
  • Marty is working on a new database to overcome
    this.

4
System Limitations
  • The database can process as many as 100K records
    per second in the new power PCs faster
    processors.
  • But, the fastest response time to an interrupt is
    on the order of 30 usecs for interrupt latency
    and record processing
  • Distributed IOCs can run loops over Channel
    Access at about 20 Hz, care must be taken to
    handle loss of communication.
  • Faster applications must be done in dedicated
    hardware (interface it to EPICS for integration
    and expose all variables and configuration
    parameters)
  • There is no way to add channels to a running IOC
    without restarting it (redundant IOCs may limit
    the impact)

5
Channel Access Limitations
  • There are currently 2 versions of the Server
  • There is no built in name introspection
  • What to do about an interface to devices? a thin
    interface supports general purpose / reusable
    clients
  • Currently we can only monitor on value dead band,
    alarm dead band, or change of alarm status. It
    would be nice if we could monitor on
  • Frequency or dead band per client
  • Monitor device when a certain state is true (BPMs
    used for different virtual beam lines)
  • No support for synchronous gets from variety of
    IOCs (there are at least two instances of data
    silo for getting synch data but not in the
    release of EPICS)
  • The support for arrays is weak
  • The time base and offset are not in the array
    data
  • There is no direct support for multi dimensional
    arrays.
  • No support for subarrays in the protocol
  • Arrays are not buffered only pointers to the
    arrays are buffered
  • There is no support to direct the record to
    process for a get or put this is decided
    statically in the field description in the .dbd
    file.

6
Database Limitations
  • Only time stamp, display limits and control
    limits meta data can be obtained. It would be
    nice if some new metadata or data structures were
    available
  • Statistical information
  • Data from the past? Statistical data from the
    past?
  • Message / State Data?
  • Data to support device implementation
  • There is weak support for process control
    algorithms for PID and lead/lag control and no
    control loop cascading support
  • The record set and record reference manual needs
    to be updated.
  • Redundancy is supported in a limited way but
    there is no fielded device support that takes
    advantage of this capability.

7
Configuration tools are limited
  • Reusable relational database tools for
    configuration are nearly non-existent.
  • All configuration tools are done in stand alone
    tools not in an integrated environment.

8
Clients
  • Adherence to industrial standards for tools like
    a state-transition tool
  • Integrated develop environment would be nice is
    CSS becoming this?
  • Physics applications are not tightly integrated
    with the control system and frequently these
    tools recreate functionality that is ready in
    other client tools.
  • Web based technology is not available in a
    uniform way.

9
Conclusions
  • Our community has successfully delivered control
    systems for a number of applications.
  • The ability to share software and hardware
    solutions is enhanced by working on the same base
    even though it is flawed.
  • The architecture supports the ability to create
    work-arounds.
  • There is always work that can be done to improve
    productivity and reliability while reducing
    costs.
  • The community should actively inform us when
    things are not working or if you have a better
    solution that we could use.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com