The Brookings Institution, Washington, D'C'www'brookings'edu - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

The Brookings Institution, Washington, D'C'www'brookings'edu

Description:

Issue #4: Family Formation. Status Quo: Emphasized in purposes of law. Law contains numerous small carrots but few big sticks for discouraging ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: brook7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Brookings Institution, Washington, D'C'www'brookings'edu


1
Goals of Welfare Reform Beyond
  • To identify the major issues and opportunities
    for improved policy that should be addressed
    during the welfare reform reauthorization
    debate.
  • To improve the general level of debate by helping
    Congress and interested parties outside Congress
    understand what has been learned from research
    about the successes and shortcoming of welfare
    reform.
  • To identify alternative policies that could be
    adopted by Congress to address the shortcomings
    of welfare reform.

2
TANF Reauthorization Issues
  • Issue 1 Purposes of TANF
  • Issue 2 Funding of TANF
  • Issue 3 Time Limits
  • Issue 4 Family Formation
  • Issue 5 Providing a Safety Net for Children
  • Issue 6 Child Care
  • Other Issues

3
Issue 1 Purposes of TANF
  • Status Quo
  • Provide assistance to needy families
  • End dependency via job preparation, work, and
    marriage
  • Reduce out-of-wedlock pregnancies
  • Encourage formation of two-parent families
  • Liberal Argument
  • Too much emphasis on reducing caseloads not
    enough on reducing poverty
  • Conservative Argument
  • Even more emphasis needed on family formation
  • Options
  • A rewrite of purposes reflecting political
    environment in 2002
  • An attempt to establish performance measures
    linked to purposes
  • Re-evaluation of rewards and penalties for
    performance (e.g. caseload reduction credit)

4
Issue 2 Funding of TANF
  • Status Quo
  • Funding of 16.5 billion per year expiring in
    2002
  • States required to spend 75-80 of FY 1994 level
  • Arguments for Reduced Funding
  • Current funding levels set when caseloads higher
  • Many states not using full block grant
    allocations
  • Counter Arguments
  • Reneges on bargain made earlier with states
  • Funding declining in real terms
  • No longer adjusts automatically during recessions
  • Funds needed to provide help to hard-to-employ
    and working poor
  • Options
  • Lower funding
  • Adjust block grant for inflation
  • Add adjustment for economic conditions

5
Issue 3 Time Limits
  • Status Quo
  • Five year lifetime limit on use of federal funds
    for most recipients
  • 20 of caseload exempted from this limit
  • Arguments for Retaining
  • Time limits needed to send clear national message
    about changed nature of welfare system
  • Shorter time limits implemented by some states do
    not appear to have had any major consequences
  • States can use their own funds to keep people on
    rolls longer
  • Continued---

6
Issue 3 Time Limits
  • Counter Arguments
  • Five year limit begins to kick-in Fall 2001 have
    not yet seen full effects
  • May create undue hardship, especially if it takes
    effect in the middle of a recession
  • Time limits less important than sanctions in
    motivating mothers to work
  • Large number of families are floundering because
    of severe barriers to work
  • 20 exemption is insufficient
  • Options
  • Eliminate federal time limit but allow states to
    establish own limits
  • Stop the clock for mothers who work a minimum
    number of hours while receiving welfare
  • Liberalize exemptions from time limit
  • Allow earnback of time for those off welfare

7
Issue 4 Family Formation
  • Status Quo
  • Emphasized in purposes of law
  • Law contains numerous small carrots but few big
    sticks for discouraging childbearing outside
    marriage
  • Family caps and denial of benefits to minor
    mothers permitted
  • Conservative Arguments
  • Despite laws emphasis on this goal, states have
    emphasized work and largely ignored this critical
    area
  • Illegitimacy is still a big problem
  • Liberal Arguments
  • Far less public consensus about values here
  • We dont know how to promote childbearing within
    marriage
  • Emphasis should be on assisting all family types
    equally
  • Continued---

8
Issue 4 Family Formation
  • Options
  • Reduce the marriage penalty in the EITC (as part
    of a tax bill)
  • Provide bonuses to those that have children
    within marriage
  • Enact legislation that assists fathers
  • Provide more funding for teen pregnancy
    prevention (e.g., abstinence education, family
    planning, media campaigns, after-school programs)
  • Tie the illegitimacy bonus in current law more
    closely to state efforts
  • Experiment with complete elimination of welfare
    benefits for young unwed mothers

9
Issue 5 Providing a Safety Net for Children
  • Status Quo
  • No individual entitlement to welfare
  • Food stamps and Medicaid only safety net
  • Liberal Arguments
  • Too little attention has been paid to the impact
    of welfare reform on children
  • Children likely to be harmed by removal of safety
    net
  • Conservative Arguments
  • Safety net has encouraged out-of-wedlock
    childbearing
  • Children benefit from having parents who model
    mainstream behaviors
  • No evidence of significant harm so far
  • Child poverty has declined since 1993
  • Continued---

10
Issue 5 Providing a Safety Net for Children
  • Options
  • Restore individual entitlement to welfare
  • Provide more assistance to families with
    children, but primarily for those who are working
  • Further reduce benefits, especially to minor
    mothers who have children out of wedlock
  • Use state funds or Social Service Block Grant
    vouchers to assist needy children

11
Issue 6 Child Care
  • Status Quo
  • Congress provided 4.5 billion in extra funding
    for child care over 6 years
  • States can spend up to 30 of TANF dollars for
    child care
  • States responsible for regulating quality
  • Liberal Arguments
  • If require mothers to work, must address what
    happens to kids
  • HHS estimates only 10 of children eligible for
    child care block grant are served
  • Much child care of poor quality
  • Not enough available during nonstandard hours
  • Conservative Arguments
  • Funding of child care has increased dramatically
  • No evidence of unmet demand for child care
  • Little evidence that quality matters
  • Continued---

12
Issue 6 Child Care
  • Options
  • Provide more funding for child care
  • More funding for Head Start and universal pre-K
  • Allow states to spend a higher percentage of TANF
    money on child care

13
Other Issues
  • Allocation of Funds among the States
  • Participation in food stamps and Medicaid
  • Supports for Working Families (EITC, earnings
    disregards, health care, child care, minimum
    wages, etc.)
  • Community Service Jobs or Work Programs
  • Child Support Enforcement
  • Education, Job Retention, and Advancement
  • The Adequacy of the Safety Net during Recessions
  • Benefits for Legal Immigrants
  • Services for Floundering Families
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com