Title: Chapter 2: Groups
1Chapter 2 Groups
- Social Psychology by Tom Gilovich, Dacher
Keltner, and Richard Nisbett
2What is a Group?
- two or more people who
- interact with each other directly or indirectly
- share common goals/share norms
- have a stable relationship
- are interdependent
- perceive they are part of a group
- not a collection of people in a lobby, street
corner, or elevator
3Group Formation and Function
- People join groups to
- satisfy important needs (e.g., belonging, safety)
- reach goals they cannot achieve alone
- boost their self-identity
- Groups function through
- roles- expected behavior for different positions
- status- social standing within group
- norms- rules for behaving within group
- cohesiveness- forces that cause members to stay
in group (attraction, desire for status)
4Decision-Making in Groups
- Social Decision Schemes- rules comparing initial
group views to final group decisions - majority-wins rule- group opts for whatever
decision majority agreed with initially - truth-wins rule- group eventually accepts correct
decision - first-shift rule- groups adopt decision
consistent with direction of first shift in
opinion - these simple rules predict final outcome 80 of
time
5Consequences of Group Decision Making
- Conventional wisdom suggests groups would make
better decisions than individual - Greater informational resources
- More likely to identify and correct errors
- Not clear if groups make better decisions than
individuals - Group polarization
- Groupthink
- Mixed research support
6Group Polarization
Group Polarization- tendency to shift toward
more extreme positions after group discussion
7Groupthink
8Mixed Research Support
- Most group decision research takes place in lab
- Groups are not real groups
- Group development theories suggest groups need
time to develop effective interaction patterns - (e.g., Tuckman and Jensen)
- Forming
- Storming
- Norming
- Performing
- Lab groups dont have time to develop so
effectiveness could hinge on personality of most
competent member
9Social Facilitation
- Definition The effect, positive or negative, of
the presence of others on performance. - 1. Initial Research
- a. Triplett (1898)
10Social Facilitation
- 2. Resolving the Contradictions
- a. Zajoncs theory
- mere presence. Dominant response
11Fig. 2.2 left
12Fig. 2.2 right
13Sources of Arousal
- Evaluation Apprehension
- A concern about looking bad in front of others
- Cottrell, et, al. 1968
14Sources of Arousal
- Mere presence
- Presence of others is arousing
- Cockroaches probably not worried about looking
bad - Markus (1978)
15Social Facilitation
Distraction-Conflict Theory
Conflict
Organism performing some task
Presence of audience or coactors
Social facilitation effects
Increased arousal
16Social Loafing
Tendency to slack off when individual effort
cannot be monitored
Latane, Williams, and Harkins (1979)
Potential productivity
Pseudogroup productivity
Actual group productivity
17Conflict in Groups
Conflictperceived incompatible interests
- Other causes of conflict besides incompatibility
- Faulty attributionserroneous blame
- Poor communicationmisinterpreted criticism,
grudges - Tendency to see own views as objective, while
others have biased views - Status quo biaspowerful groups often inaccurate
- Type A personalityhighly competitive and hostile
18Strategies for Dealing With Conflict
Competing
Collaborating
Compromising
Accommodating
Avoiding
19Perceived Fairness in Groups
- The presence of others affects our judgments of
fairness - Judgments typically made by social comparison
- Fairness can be judged in terms of
- outcomes (distributive justice)
- Equity distribution
- Equality distribution
- Need distribution
- procedures (procedural justice)
20Equity Theory
Perceived inequity creates a state of
unpleasant tension that we are motivated to
reduce How do we perceive inequity
(unfairness)? According to Adams, inequity is
perceived when our perception of the ratio of our
Inputs to Outputs is different from that of a
comparison other .
21Equity Theory
Perceived inequity creates a state of
unpleasant tension that we are motivated to
reduce How do we perceive inequity
(unfairness)? According to Adams, inequity is
perceived when our perception of the ratio of our
Inputs to Outputs is different from that of a
comparison other . An example
Larry
Moe
Curly
our perception
Inputs amount of work, KSAs, experience
Outputs pay, promotions, perqs
22Study Smarter Student Website
- http//www.wwnorton.com/socialpsych
- Chapter Reviews
- Diagnostic Quizzes
- Vocabulary Flashcards
- Apply It! Exercises