Title: The Benefits of Using Eye Tracking in Usability Testing
1The Benefits of Using Eye Tracking in Usability
Testing
- Jennifer C. Romano
- Usability Laboratory
- Statistical Research Division
- U.S. Census Bureau
2Overview
- What is usability?
- Introduction to eye tracking
- Using eye tracking in usability testing
3What is usability?
- Defined as the effectiveness, efficiency, and
satisfaction with which a specified set of users
can achieve a specified set of tasks in a
particular environment (ISO/TR 169822002)
4What is usability testing?
- Usability testing is concerned with assessing how
usable a product is. - Can users interact with the product in an
effective, efficient, and satisfying way? - Evaluation at any stage of development
- Iterative testing
5Why do usability testing?
- Design often does not take the users mental
models into account. - Users have their own cognitive limitations and
capabilities. - Test the product on the end user.
6Usability Evaluation Benefits
- Satisfied users
- Improved data quality
- Less measurement error
- Reduced training time
7Usability Testing Measures
- Effectiveness
- Accuracy
- Efficiency
- Time to complete a task/survey
- Satisfaction
- Self-rated satisfaction
8Introduction to Eye Tracking
Photo from www.smith.umd.edu/behaviorlab/eyetrack
er.aspx
9Introduction to Eye Tracking
- Captures where people look as they navigate
through a Web site - Shows an individuals pathway
- Accumulates data and shows common pathways
10Eye-Tracking Measures
- Fixations
- Time to first look at an area of interest (AOI)
- How often people look at AOI
- Hot spots
- Areas that get most attention
- Gaze plots
- Pattern of search
11Benefits of Eye Tracking
- Identify areas that attract users attention or
areas that are difficult to understand - Identify how long it takes people to look at
something - Identify where people look
- Where people look
- Where people never look
12Questions Eye Tracking Can Answer
- Why does it take users a long time to complete
the task/survey? - Why do users have low accuracy?
- Why arent the users satisfied?
- Are people looking atsomething?
- Terminology orsomething else?
13Usability Study
14Task 1
- Task You want to use data from two different
data sources, but are unsure if they are
comparable. Find out if this information exists
on the site. - Solution Get Data or User Guide
15Task 1 Usability Findings
- Users seemed unclear on where to find the
information. Five participants (56) selected
Get Data from the center of the screen, and three
(33) selected User Guide from the top
navigation. - Of the five participants who selected Get Data,
two successfully completed the task. Of the three
participants who selected User Guide, only one
successfully completed the task. - Accuracy 33
- Efficiency (correct only) 3m12s
16(No Transcript)
17Task 1 Hot Spot Findings
18Task 1 Hot Spot Findings
19Task 1 Hot Spot Findings
20Task 2
- Task You are unsure of the difference between
Places and Metropolitan Areas. Where would
you find this information on this site? - Solution Definition ? Geography
21Task 2 Usability Findings
- Most participants initially scrolled through the
definitions list, expecting to find the meanings
of Metropolitan Areas and Places (which were
not in the listing but rather located on the
Geography page). - Two participants never used the Geography link
and instead navigated to the Site Map to find the
target information.
22Task 2 Usability Findings
- Users said that they expected the format to be
the same as the format of the Definitions page. - Accuracy 78
- Efficiency (correct only) 4m32s
23(No Transcript)
24Task 2 Gaze Plot Findings
25Task 2 Gaze Plot Findings
26Fixation Findings
Areas of Interest (AOIs) Areas of Interest (AOIs) Areas of Interest (AOIs) Areas of Interest (AOIs)
Participant Top nav Left nav Center Right nav
1 49s 5s 3s 7s
2 2s 3s 2s 4s
3 45s 34s 6s 20s
4 7m48s, task 3 27s 2s 27s
5 2m2s, task 2 3s 2s 1m20s
6 18s, task 2 15s, task 2 2s 16s, task 2
7 2m2s 20s 2s 2m23s
8 49s 1m50s 8s 9s
Mean 1m43s 24s 3s 34s
27Conclusion
- Obtain measures that are not obtainable from
traditional usability measures. - What people (do not) look at
- How often they look there
- Time into the study to look there
- Quantitative data supports usability findings
28Conclusion
- Without obtaining this type of data, it is
impossible to determine where people look on the
screen and how often they look there. - Its simply not possible to get data on where
people looked, how quickly they looked, and how
often they looked using only conventional
experimental methods.
29Conclusion
- Future usability testing should aim to include
eye tracking as a method of collecting data.
30Thank you!
- Jennifer C. Romano
- Usability Laboratory
- Statistical Research Division
- U.S. Census Bureau
- (301)763-3577
- Email
- Jennifer.romano_at_census.gov
- LinkedIn http//www.linkedin.com/in/jenniferroman
o