Title: Trials Registration An Ethical Perspective
1Trials RegistrationAn Ethical Perspective
Cochrane Symposium Montreal Dec 2, 2005
- Michael Goodyear1, Lisa Golec2
- 1. Department of Medicine, Queen Elizabeth II
Health Sciences Centre, - Dalhousie University, Halifax
- 2. Sunnybrook and Womens College Health Sciences
Centre, - University of Toronto,Toronto
2Trial Registration Objectives
- Ethical Principles and Knowledge
- Registration as Ethical Imperative
- Role of Ethical Review
- Relationship between Ethical Review and
Registration - Nurturing a collaborative culture
- From Silos to Nets
3Trial Registration
- Collective Duty of Care (Prior and Post)
- Prior Inception
- Decisions based on totality of prior information
- Post Execution
- Information acquired will be disclosed for the
Highest Derived Good (1)
(1) Kant, Critique of Practical Reason, 1778
4Trial Registration
- Prior Knowledge
- Subjects are entitled to believe that decisions
and information provided are based on all
knowledge - But Prior Knowledge is Incomplete and Selective
- Research may be unnecessarily Duplicative (2) -
(2) Young C, Horton R. Lancet 3666 107, 2005
5Cumulative Meta-analysis of Aprotinin for
Perioperative Bleeding (3)
Where was Equipoise?
(3) Fergusson, Glass, Hutton, Shapiro Clinical
Trials 2218, 2005
6Ellen Roche
Would Ellen be alive today, if the Hexamethonium
trials had been registered?
Ellen Roche, a Healthy Volunteer
7Trial Registration
- Greater (Highest, Common) Good
- Probability of real benefit to an individual is
low - Subjects often consent to benefit Society
8Jesse Gelsinger
What's the worst that can happen to me? I
die, and it's for the babies." (4)
(4) New York Times, 28 Nov 1999
9Trial Registration
- Subjects have the right to believe that any
information derived from their participation will
be fully and freely disclosed for the common good
10Trial Registration
- Scope of Registration?
- Respect for Persons is Unconditional and
Universal - Independent of Study Design, Funding, or Location
11Trial Registration
- Scope of Registration
- Respect for Persons is Unconditional and
Universal - Independent of Study Design, Funding, Location
- All Human Research
12Trial Registration
- Ethical Review and Registration
- Determine state of knowledge, including prior,
current and planned studies - Determine role of other ethical review bodies
- Ensure continuing disclosure
13Trial Registration
- Ethical Review and Registration have Reciprocal
Relationship - Registration is essential to ensure maximum
Transparency and Accountability - Registration includes ensuring appropriate
Ethical Review
14Trial Registration
- Ethical review bodies can use registry data to
monitor other ethical review and ongoing
disclosure - Unique identifiers can be used to link all
documentation, including ethics review and
subject materials
15Trial Registration
- Human subject research and review is becoming
increasingly complex and evolving - Multi-Centred
- Multi-Sponsored
- Globalised
- Registration Joins-the-Dots, and makes a
Net-work, a Culture of Collaboration
16Trial RegistrationStakeholders to Collaborators
- Society
- Subjects
- Researchers
- Institutions
- Funders
- Networks/Consortia
- Ethical review community/CAREB
- National entities
- NCEHR
- Professional bodies
- Journals/Reviewers
- Government
- WHO
- Provider/Consumers
No man is an Island (Donne)
17Trial Registration
- Issues for Consideration
- (e.g. Ottawa II)
- National registries? Few or Many?
- Seamless linkage between registries
- Ease of searching for specific knowledge
- Mechanics of interaction of ethical review and
registration
18Trial Registration
- Interaction of Ethical Review and Registration
Who goes first? - Early registration maximises benefit
- Potential Chicken and Egg Dilemma
- Register once scientific and ethical review
complete - Consider provisional registration prior to
activation - But No recruitment till both steps in place
19Trial Registration Conclusions
- Registration is central to ethical integrity
- Ethical review is greatly enhanced by
registration - Ethical review bodies need to work in a
collaborative research culture
20Thankyou
Authors
Michael Goodyear Dalhousie
Lisa Golec Toronto
Collaborators
Sabina Watts McMaster
Elisabeth Clark McGill