Title: AirFlow Mechanisms During AirSparging Operations
1Air-Flow Mechanisms During Air-Sparging Operations
- Patricia J. Culligan
- Associate Professor, MIT
- INEEL Workshop, March 2003
2Acknowledgements
- Dr. Catalina Marulanda
- Mr. Michael Paonessa
- Dr. John Germaine
- Mr. Stephen Rudolph
- National Institute for Environmental Health
Sciences - National Science Foundation
3Outline of presentation
- Background and Research Objectives
- Experimental investigation
- Methods, Procedure, Results
- Numerical investigation
- New model formulation
- Model validation
- Conclusions
4Insitu Air-Sparging (IAS)
- Technique for the remediation of groundwater
contaminated with VOCs
5Efficiency of IAS
- Performance of an IAS system dependent on extent
of contact between injected air and contamination
- Overall system effectiveness limited by
- patterns of air flow
- zone of influence of air sparging well, ZOI
- air saturation within boundaries of air sparging
plume
- Understanding mechanisms controlling air-flow
during IAS are crucial to designing efficient IAS
systems
6- IAS used in the US since 1990s
- Now demonstrated EPA technology
- In engineering practice
- Current state of IAS design largely empirical and
based on pilot studies at site - Research community has developed numerous
theoretical models for IAS design - solve full
two-phase flow problem - Generally not available to practitioners
- Require parameters not typically measured in
field (a m)
7Air-entry into a soil pore
- For air-entry into a saturated soil, the air
pressure must exceed the sum of the hydrostatic
pressure of fluid and the capillary pressure that
exists as a result of surface tension between air
and the pore fluid
8Capillary pressure
- Magnitude of the capillary pressure at a pore
throat in a saturated soil is generally
approximated by - Pc 2scosq/r
- s surface tension
- q contact angle between fluids and soil phase
- r pore throat radius
- (soil pore throat is approximated as a capillary
tube of diameter r) - Thus, for air to invade a soil pore (i.e., get
past the restriction offered by a soil pore
throat) - Pair gt Phydro 2scosq/r
- (Where it is assumed that the water is not
moving)
9Ratio of hydrostatic to capillary pressure
- Ratio Pcap / Phyd is important to the problem
- Pcap / Phyd gtgt 1, soil fracture possible
- Pcap / Phyd 1, local capillary pressures
likely to influence air- movement - Pcap / Phyd ltlt 1, local capillary pressures less
likely to influence air-movement - For most practical applications of IAS, Pcap /
Phyd ltlt 1
10Pcapillary/Phydrostatic vs Depth of Injection
D
1
0
m
m
1
0
D
1
m
m
1
0
D
0
.
1
m
m
1
0
D
0
.
0
1
m
m
1
0
P(cap)/P(hydro)
11Research Objectives
Experimental Investigation of Air-Flow Patterns
as f(Pcap/Phydro)
Parameters Controlling Air-Flow Propagation
During IAS
Model Validation
Model to Predict ZOI of Sparge Well
Model Validation
Predictions in Field
12Past Experimental Studies
- Laboratory scale tests - used small models
less than 0.5 m high - Tank tests - larger scale models up to 1.5 m
high - Do not capture the ratio between P(cap)/P(hydro)
typically encountered in the field - Field tests
- Cannot conduct parametric study. Often hard to
interpret
13Experimental investigation
- Two unique experimental tools used during this
investigation - Geotechnical centrifuge
- use centrifugal acceleration to vary Phydro (vary
g and hence rgh) - testing over range of P(cap)/P(hydo)
- Immersion method
- matching index of refraction of granular material
and saturating fluid creates transparent
saturated porous medium - flow patterns could be observed and characterized
during testing
14MIT geotechnical centrifuge
15Detail of centrifuge platform and air sparging
sample
16Porous media tested
Crushed Pyrex and Pyrex glass beads
saturated with glycerol or immersion liquid
- Index of refraction
- of saturated Pyrex
- n 1.471
17Experimental procedure
- Experiments conducted under accelerations ranging
from 1-g to 100-g
18Captured images
19Constant pressure propagation at 1-g
20Constant pressure propagation at 40-g
21Effect of g-level on air propagation under
constant flow rate injection
Q 0.66 cm3/s
22Sudden increase in injection flow rate at 1-g
Q 10.83 cm3/s
23Mechanisms of air propagation
24Important parameters governing air propagation
- Hydraulic conductivity
- Air flow cannot occur until pore fluid has been
displaced. Rate of pore fluid outflow (measured
by q/K) critical to air propagation - Three scenarios
- low q/K pore fluid outflow does not constrain
air inflow ? narrow plumes develop - high q/K rate of pore fluid flow not fast enough
to accommodate all air inflow ? plume propagates
laterally, wider plumes result - v.high q/K ? medium fractures
25Dimensionless RZI of a Sparge Well
P
h
r
e
a
t
i
c
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
S
u
r
f
a
c
e
o
f
r
e
v
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
e
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
R
Z
I
2
p
H
2
Hrmax
A
i
r
H
s
p
a
r
g
i
n
g
p
l
u
m
e
I
n
j
e
c
t
i
o
n
p
o
r
t
26Compilation of Data
Sa low
27New numerical model and assumptions
- Darcys law is valid and governs propagation of
air front - Air propagation takes place as a uniform front
which displaces fluid present in the pores of the
medium - Porous medium within plume boundaries is fully
saturated with air - Ideal gas law applies
28Finite difference mesh
29Axisymmetric mesh
30Input Parameters
31Air propagation
32Model fit to experimental data
33Model fit to experimental data
34Model Fit to Experimental Data
35Comparisons with existing model
36Conclusions
- Experimental investigation
- Behavior in the field is strongly influenced by
ratio P(cap)/P(hydro) - Ratio of air-injection rate to soil hydraulic
conductivity important to problem - Numerical model
- A simple model was developed that accurately
predicts the geometric characteristics of
observed air sparging plumes without the use of
fitting parameters - Model currently being tested against field data
- New model could considerably improve the
efficiency of the IAS emerging technology in
practice