Title: Kein Folientitel
1(No Transcript)
2- APPLICATION OF EC COMPETITION LAW
- BY THE DOMESTIC JUDICIARY
- ? Agreements and Concerted Practices
- ? Object or Effect of Restricting Competition
-
- Dr. Franz Urlesberger
- Schönherr Rechtsanwälte
SCHÖNHERR
3Requirements of Art 81
- Involvement of two or more independent
undertakings or an association of undertakings - Agreements or concerted practices
- having the object or effect to restrict
competition - Intra-state element
- Appreciability.
SCHÖNHERR
4Collusion between competitors
What shall I do about it? They say this is no
concerted practice but their way to greet each
other!
SCHÖNHERR
5Agreements and Concerted Practices
- Policy decision no cooperation between
independent undertakings - Is parallel behaviour result of collusion or
- natural effect?
SCHÖNHERR
6What Constitutes an Agreement?
- interpreted broadly (no legalistic/formalistic
approach) - not limited to legally enforceable agreements
- Gentlemen's agreements
- mutual understandings
- oral or in writing
concurrence of wills required
SCHÖNHERR
7Agreements - Examples
- Settlement of a law suit (Penneys, OJ 1978 L
60/19) - Gentlemans agreements (Case 41/69, ACF
Chemipharma) - Understandings (National Panasonic, OJ 1982 L
354/28) - Single overall agreement (ENI, OJ 1987 L 5/13)
- Oral agreements (Case 28/77, Tepea v Commission)
- Constitution of a trade association (Nuovo CEGAM,
OJ 1984 L 99/29) - Guidelines adhered to by another party (Anheuser,
OJ 2000 L 49/37)
SCHÖNHERR
8Agreement vs Concerted Practice
- ECJ No need for classification(C-49/92,
Commission v ANIC) - Concept of a Single Overall Agreement(Polypropy
lene, OJ 1986 L 230/1)
SCHÖNHERR
9Concerted Practices Definition (1)
- ECJ in Dyestuffs (Case 48/69)
- "a form of coordination between undertakings
which, without having reached the stage where an
agreement properly so-called has been concluded,
knowingly substitutes practical cooperation
between them for the risks of competition.
SCHÖNHERR
10Concerted Practices Definition (2)
- ECJ in Suiker Unie (Case 40/73)
- "any direct or indirect contact between such
operators, the object of effect whereof is either
to influence the conduct on the market of an
actual or potential competitor or to disclose to
such a competitor the course of conduct which
they themselves have decided to adopt or
contemplate adopting on the market.
SCHÖNHERR
11Concerted Practices Definition (3)
- Polypropylene (OJ 1986 L 230/1)
- "there are many forms and degrees of collusion
and it does not require the making of a formal
agreement. An infringement of Article 81 may well
exist where the parties have not even spelled out
an agreement in terms but each infers commitment
from the other on the basis of conduct"
SCHÖNHERR
12Concerted Practices Must there be an Effect? (1)
- A concerted practice requires
- some form of concertation and
- a (coordinated) practice resulting from such
concertation - But (anti-competitive) effects must not be
proven
SCHÖNHERR
13 Concerted Practices Must there be an Effect?
(2)
- ECJ in Hüls (C-199/92 1999 ECR I-4287)
- A concerted practice is caught by Article 81
(1) EC, even in the absence of anti-competitive
effects on the market. - e.g. information exchange (concertation) ?
consideration of information (coordinated
practice) ? no price increase (no effect) ? still
caught by Art 81.
SCHÖNHERR
14Burdon of Prooffor a Concerted Practice
- In principle Commission
- What evidence constitutes proof?
- Direct evidence (documents, testimonies etc)
- Indirect evidence (indications)
- Is parallel behaviour evidence?
- Dyestuffs
- Wood Pulp
SCHÖNHERR
15Unilateral Behaviour
- Concurrence of wills required by Art 81 EC
- Broad interpretation
- AEG Telefunken (Case 107/82)
- Ford (Case 25/84)
- Sandoz (C-277/87)
- Narrow interpretation
- Volkswagen (T-208/01)
- Bayer (C-2, 3/01)
SCHÖNHERR
16Object or Effect of Restricting Competition -
Preliminary Remarks
- Prior to Reg 1 (1 May 2004)
- agreements within Art 81 (1) are unenforceable,
if - neither block exempted nor
- notified to the Commission under Art 81 (3)
- Since Reg 1
- restrictive agreement are enforceable if Art 81
(3) is satisfied - focus has shifted from Art 81 (1) to Art 81 (3)
SCHÖNHERR
17Object or Effect
- Suggests ...
- two alternatives
- a certain order
- Only if the object of an agreement is not
anti-competitive its effect must be assessed
(Société Technique Minière). - subjective intention of the parties is
irrelevant - agreements with anti-competitive object may only
be lawful on the basis of Art 81 (3)
SCHÖNHERR
18Agreements having as their object a restriction
of competition
- Horizontal agreements
- Price fixing
- Market sharing
- Output/sales limitations
- Exchanges of price information
- Collective exclusive dealing
- Vertical agreements
- Resale price maintenance
- Restrictions of passive sales
SCHÖNHERR
19Agreements having as their effect a restriction
of competition (1)
- Economic concept Analysis of the agreement in
its market context is required. - Contractual restrictions may have pro-competitive
effects, e.g. - exclusive distribution agreements or
- consortia agreements.
SCHÖNHERR
20Agreements having as their effect a restriction
of competition (2)
- Restriction of the freedom of action in relation
to market parameters. - Not Intra-group agreements, market remote
activities or in the absence of freedom to act. - Adverse effect on the market (prices, quality,
variety, innovation, etc) - Guidance in Commission Guidelines, in particular
on - horizontal cooperation agreements (OJ 2001 C
3/02) and - vertical restraints (OJ 2000 C 291/01).
SCHÖNHERR