Title: Trade vs' Aid
1Trade vs. Aid
- Rich Nation strategies for helping the Poor in
Poor Countries
2Pro-poor Nation Trade Strategies
- Open markets in garments, footwear and
Agriculture - Reduce agricultural subsidies for nonfood items
- Encourage poor countries to open markets, to FDI
and to join the WTO as China did in 2001. - Promote regional trade blocs favoring poorer
nations, such as Nafta, the FTAA, or the EU, - Let poor consumers buy clothing shoes, computers,
from poor countries such as China, Bangladesh w/o
an extra 20-30 tax.
3 Increase Foreign Aid by
- Increasing conditional multilateral aid
disbursements (World Bank, ADB, etc.) - Contribute to UN Aids-Malaria-TB fund
- Debt-relief forgive debt of poorest countries
- Increased food aid via the World Food Program?
4Six Advantages of Increasing Trade with Poor
Nations
- Encourages work and creates jobs about 35 jobs
in LDCs for each OECD job lost, in fact, lower
tariffs likely adds jobs both in the U.S. and
abroad. - Reduces cost of basic foods and clothing.
- Low wages target the poor (self-targeting)
- Reduces immigration, speeds convergence
- Fights terrorism? (see Kristof Let them
Sweat). - Undermines local elites, reduces corruption and
SIGs influence in the U.S. Congress.
5Disadvantages (difficulties) of Increasing Trade
with Poor Countries
- May increase inequality initiallyurban, skilled
worker bias (small farmers excepted). - Threatens jobs in the OECD (not really!)
- Political Opposition threat to local firms
creates political opposition within OECD. - Puts U.S. consumers in contact with severe
poverty - Does not reach some disadvantaged groups
Geographically isolated, ill or otherwise unable
to work in export industries.
6Advantages of Cash and in-kind Foreign Aid
- Aid can be effective, if it is well targeted
food is an example that has stimulated growth in
LDCs. - Can improve health and education, pre-requisites
for broad benefits from globalization. - Can reach ill and isolated poor in rural areas.
- Cost of aid can be low (food aid- farm
surpluses). - Can save or prevent failed nations such as
Somolia or Afghanistan remove safe havens for
terrorists. - Debt Relief can give some poor countries with a
history of political instability a new start
(Bono).
7Disadvantages of Increasing Aid
- Fosters corruption, enhances power of government
and local elites. - Can undermine work and investment incentives.
- Hard to target lots of leakage.
- Politically unpopular due to popular awareness of
above problems. - Food aid can undermine local farm profits.
- Debt relief reduces access and amount of
international credit and future aid.
8Six point World Bank GGP Agenda includes both
Trade and Aid
- Doha Trade liberalization Round (pp. 155 55-64)
- Investment climate- governance (pp.156,85-87,121-2
5) - Primary education (pp. 157 85-87)
- Social Protection for workers (pp.158,
112-14,117-19) - More foreign aid (p. 159 and 67-68)
- Debt Relief for HIPCs (p. 159 and 67-68)
- Page numbers refer to World Bank Globalization,
Growth and Poverty.
9What is the Doha WTO Agenda?
- A break from TRIPs (patent restrictions on drug
use and production) in Pharmaceuticals until
2016 but other IPRs will be respected. - Accelerate the ATC to phase out quotas and high
tariffs on garments and footwear. - Begin discussions of how to reduce farm subsidies
in the EU, U.S. and Japan both to give LDC
farmers access to these markets and to stop
dumping of subsidized farm products.
10Reducing Garment and footwear trade barriers can
benefit the poor in the U.S. and in LDCs
- Poor consumers are hit hardest by higher cost low
end clothing. - Pakistan, Indonesia and Bangladesh along with
Tunisia, Jordan etc. are important allies who how
pay big taxes to sell their products in the U.S.
market. - Low wage jobs in these industries target the
poorest workers (women) very effectively.
11In the U.S., trade taxes hit poor families
hardest, taking away 3-5 days of income.
12(No Transcript)
13(No Transcript)
14Tariffs raise the price of cheap shoes by 50,
high taxes on poor families.
15But dont tariffs and quotas save American jobs?
Probably not. They costs U.S. jobs
- Tariffs are high taxes, that discourage
employment and sales the U.S. International
Trade Commission (2) says ending protection in
garments and shoes would increase employment in
the U.S. instead of handing 300 over to the
government, single parent families would spend it
on other goods and services, creating more jobs
in their communities but not jobs making shoes
and clothes. - Employment in the garment and shoes has declined
as fast as other protected sectors despite very
high rates of protection quotas and escalating
tariffs.
16Some jobs will be lost in garments and shoe
industries, but just a few
- Employment in ladies garments has fallen to about
24,000 and just 3,000 U.S. workers make sneakers
(not the cheap ones). - These workers can be assisted with better
targeted adjustment assistance they will switch
jobs be as well off, and poor families will save
hundreds of dollars per year (see Kletzer and
Litan (2001) A prescription to relieve worker
Anxiety IIF (see web page).
17Conclusions on Trade
- Trade liberalization in Textiles and Non-food
Agriculture can help millions of the poorest, and
save all American consumers moneyan almost
painless cure when combined with adjustment
assistance for displaced workers. - The WTO ATC should be implemented and
accelerated, just as a tax reduction measure. - There is still a role for Foreign Aid however,
18References, Further Reading
- U.S. International Trade Commission, (USITC)
(2002)Economic Effects of Significant Import
Restraints Third Update, July, available at
ftp//ftp.usitc.gov/pub/reports/studies/pub3519.pd
f. - The Truth about Industrial country tariffs
September 2002, v. 39 no. 3, Finance and
Development (see course web page) - Gresser, Edward, (2002) Toughest on the Poor
Tariffs, Taxes and the Single Mom Policy Report,
September (see web page) - Lori G. Kletzer, Litan, Robert (2001)A
Prescription to Relieve Worker Anxiety
International Economic Policy Briefs (IIE) - (see web page or www.iie.com/policybri
efs/news01-2.htm)