Globalisation and Trade - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Globalisation and Trade

Description:

Globalisation and Trade Who Wins and Who Loses? – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:185
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: sm12
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Globalisation and Trade


1
Globalisation and Trade
  • Who Wins and Who Loses?

2
The domination of globalisation
  • Dominant process in our economic lives for the
    past 60 years
  • Accelerating since the 1970s
  • the ever-increasing integration of national
    economies into a giant one-size-fits-all global
    economy through trade and investment rules and
    privatisation, aided by technological advances,
    and driven by corporate powerColin Hines
  • Integration of the worlds economies have become
    integrated
  • An increasing proportion of what we produce and
    consume is tradedand over ever-increasing
    distances

3
Ideological domination
  • The major achievement of the system of free
    trade that has been the global regime governing
    the exchange of goods between nations since 1945
  • The promotion of free trade is written into the
    Articles of Agreement of the IMF and World Bank)
  • World Bank President Barber Conable stated in a
    press conference in 2000 that If I were to
    characterise the past decade, the most remarkable
    thing was the generation of a global consensus
    that market forces and economic efficiency were
    the best way to achieve the kind of growth which
    is the best antidote to poverty.

4
  • It could give Least Developed Countries a new
    foothold in the booming markets of the rapidly
    growing economies. . . a 1 increase in African
    global market share would be worth many times
    more than what you currently receive in aid
  • Peter Mandelsohn, EU Trade Commissioner
  • Speaking about the Doha Round of WTO talks
  • 29 February 2008

5
  • Clinton, with strong backing from U.S. organised
    labour, has advocated a time out in trade
    liberalisation and questioned whether the theory
    of comparative advantage that underpins free
    trade still applies in the 21st century
  • Reuters, 10 March 2008

6
Absolute vs. Comparative Advantage
  • Adam Smith argued that a country could gain from
    trade if it has the lowest cost of production of
    a good but what about when one country produces
    everything more efficiently?

7
Theory of Comparative Advantage
  • Ricardo argued that if each country concentrates
    on producing the goods it produces most
    efficiently and trades for other goods, all will
    gain (1817)

8
Assumptions about labour
  • Labour is the only factor of production
    included in the model
  • Within the country all peoples work is the same
    but across countries peoples work varies
  • Labour be reallocated without cost but cannot
    move between countries
  • There is no unemployment

9
Assumptions about goods
  • Goods are assumed to be heterogeneous, i.e.
    people are indifferent between the same product
    made in different countries
  • Goods can be transported costlessly costs of
    pollution?

10
Other assumptions
  • There are technological differences between
    countries
  • Model is based on only two countries

11
Mapping your personal items
  • Check the origin of the clothes you have with you
    today
  • Discuss this with a partner
  • We will conduct a survey later
  • Mobile phones and shoes can be very interesting!
  • A prize for the most exotic location!

12
The critique of the three Cs
  • Competition between poor countries
  • Control the WTO is heavily politically dominated
  • Climate change

13
Changes in the Terms of Trade of some Country
Groups, 1980-2 to 2001-3
Group change
Developed economies 7.9
Developing economies -16.7
Developing economies Africa -24.1
Least developed countries -35.2
Landlocked countries -16.0
Sub-Saharan Africa -20.7
14
Increases in inequality
  • In Latin American countries, the wage gap between
    highly skilled and unskilled increased markedly
    between 1984 and 1995--UNCTAD
  • Real purchasing power of the least skilled
    workers actually declined, in several cases by
    over 20.
  • ILO study of 30 countries in Africa, Asia and
    Latin America found that in two thirds of the
    countries the real wages of all workers fell
    between the late 1970s and the late 1980s, with
    the least skilled falling by the greatest
    percentage.
  • For 38 countries between 1965 and 1992, greater
    openness to trade had reduced the incomes of the
    poorest 40 of the population but strongly
    increased those of the remaining groups. The
    costs of adjusting to great openness are borne
    exclusively by the poorWorld Bank, 1999

15
Competition
  • Competition for commodities such as coffee, sugar
    and tea, as well as in manufactures such as
    textiles
  • Tsunami destruction exacerbated by
    tourism-related deforestation
  • Two-thirds of exports from developing countries
    come from just eight countries, none of which are
    LDCs
  • All the increase in the value of vegetables
    exported from sub-Saharan Africa has accrued to
    Kenya, and to larger farmers, who are actually
    depriving their neighbours of water they need for
    subsistence farming
  • The rise of China as a trading power has been a
    mixed blessing
  • Benefits to countries exporting raw materials
  • Disastrous for those competing in e.g. textiles

16
Solidarity in commodity markets
  • For example, in May 2005 a new government in
    Ecuador (which exports more bananas than any
    other country) signed a degree to regulate the
    volume of bananas leaving the country. Two months
    later, Malaysia and Indonesia announced a
    bilateral plan to cooperate on the palm oil,
    rubber, cocoa, timber and other markets in order
    to ensure price stability and eliminate the
    undercutting of their position by others. . . .
    On the world tea market, discussions have been
    reported involving all four leading tea
    producers, China, India, Kenya and Sri Lanka.

17
General Agreement on Sustainable Trade
Support the local Governments allowed to favour domestic production
Favouring certain partners States will be allowed to choose to give preferential trade terms to goods and services from other states which respect human rights, treat workers fairly, and protect the environment
Performance requirements States may impose requirements on corporations opening production facilities in their territories based on a minimum level of domestic input to the production process a minimum level of local equity investment a minimum level of local staff minimum environmental standards
Standstill and rollback No state party to GAST can pass laws or adopt regulations that diminish local control of industry and services
Dispute resolution Citizen groups and community institutions should be able to sue companies for violations of this trade code, under a transparent and public process.
18
Trade subsidiarity
  • Local, non-intensive goods such as seasonal fruit
    and vegetables and other raw materials which can
    be grown without much complex labour input.
  • Global, non-intensive goods, which do not need
    much labour but require a different climate from
    our own.
  • Local, complex goods that require skill and time
    to produce but not the import of raw materials.
  • Global, complex goods that need technical
    expertise and considerable time to produce and
    for which raw materials or the size of market
    suggests a problem with local production.

19
Production possibility grid
Labour Raw materials Raw materials
Labour Local Global
Labour Non-intensive Farmers markets self-build domestic textiles Fair trade replace WTO with GAST
Labour Intensive Support of local craft workers Mending to replace obsolescence end to intellectual property laws
20
Sufficiency economy
  • A watchword of sustainable economics is
    self-reliancenot self-sufficiency, which I
    believe holds very few attractions. Self-reliance
    entails combining judicious and necessary trade
    with other countries with an unapologetic
    emphasis on each country maintaining security of
    supply in terms of energy, food and even
    manufacturing.

21
Trade-related direct action in India
  • Shut-down of a Coca-Cola plant in Plachimada,
    Kerala by local tribal women the company had
    been exploiting the valuable local resource of
    water to the extent of 1.5 million litres a day
  • Blockades of 87 Coca-Cola and Pepsi plants
    nationwide inspired by the Plachimada example
  • Students at Jawaharlal Nehru University voted to
    replace their campus Nestle outlet with a café
    serving indigenous cuisine from the North East
    Tribal region of India.
  • Seed Sovereignty a nationwide movement
    encouraging non-cooperation with seed patent laws
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com