IVANA NI - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

IVANA NI

Description:

IVANA NI ETIC. Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, Croatia ... Boris Mila inovic, Marija Katic & Ivana Ni etic. 6th semester ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:54
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: ivanan9
Category:
Tags: ivana | ivana

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: IVANA NI


1
Long-lasting teaching materials in spite of
changing technology
  • IVANA NIŽETIC
  • Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing,
    University of Zagreb, Croatia

DAAD workshop, Sept, 07-14 2008, Durres
2
Preparing new course materials
  • Bologna process
  • New courses
  • New teaching approach (continuous assessment)
  • Course Development of Software Applications
  • New course Only small parts of the materials
    reused from old courses
  • Professor KreÅ¡imir Fertalj
  • Assistants Boris MilaÅ¡inovic, Marija Katic
    Ivana Nižetic
  • 6th semester
  • Academic year 2007/2008 100 students

3
Course description 1/2
  • The aim of the course is to
  • Prepare students to develop complex interactive
    applications, particularly database applications.
  • Provide a knowledge for successful design,
    construction and implementation of software
    systems.
  • Students will be able to
  • Formulate the software requirements
  • Develop, implement and maintain quality software
    built upon different software architectures.

4
Course description 2/2
  • Development of software applications
  • Development of interactive, layered applications
  • Windows, Web and Pocket PC platform
  • For real users
  • Methodological approach to software lifecycle
  • UML modelling and program documentation
  • C programming
  • Team development
  • Visual Studio Team System development environment
  • Team Foundation Server for source version control

5
Our goals while preparing materials
  • Choosing an optimal theory to practice ratio
  • Putting emphasis on concepts, not technology
  • Presenting a software project as a living matter
  • Teaching general knowledge instead of educating
    in narrow-minded way

6
Choosing an optimal theory to practice ratio
  • Students have to know general professional terms,
    but they also have to face the real-life problems
    by themselves!
  • Theory Practice 2 3 (Optimal ratio?)
  • Theory
  • Recognizing general software engineering terms
  • Evaluation tests on computer, parts of homework
    and exams
  • Practice
  • Developing applications according to user
    requirements
  • Evaluation exams and homework

7
Putting emphasis on concepts, not technology
  • Teaching software engineering concepts and
    programming in parallel
  • Example Teaching students only one UML diagram
    per time, when they really need it
  • Avoiding to make step-by-step course for
    programming in particular language
  • Avoiding to teach specialities of particular
    framework or language
  • Trying to be independent to programming language
  • Using technology as demonstration tool

8
Presenting a software project as a living matter
  • Presenting concepts in practice
  • Covering real-life problems
  • Show variety of the examples in order to cover
    different real-life problem
  • Let students write down and understand user
    requests
  • Users uncertainty and unsystematic
  • Changing requests, doubts,
  • Organizing code in order to facilitate maintenance

9
Teaching general knowledge instead of educating
in narrow-minded way
  • Avoiding to teach from a cookbook, leaving a dose
    of creativity to students
  • Giving students general suggestions and sharing
    experience with them, but force them to think
    on their own
  • Preparing student for real-life
  • Defining tasks leaving creativity to students
  • Changing user requests
  • Facing difficulties while working in teams

10
Conclusion 1/2
  • What have we actually done?
  • Let all teams develop the same big project
    during the semester
  • Organizing the database
  • Setting project requirements and defining
    priorities
  • Defining team rules
  • Developing application
  • At the end the same user, the same
    requirements gt different projects!

11
Conclusion 2/2
  • What have we actually obtained?
  • Compare to other Bologna courses, we achieve
    distribution of points most likely to Gaussian
    distribution
  • Feedback from students Hard, but very useful
    course!

12
  • Thank you for your attention!
  • Questions?

IVANA NIŽETIC FER, ZAGREB, CROATIA
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com