Title: Ume University
1Medical Biobank
Umeå University
Sweden
2Northern Sweden Health and Disease Study
- Population based cohorts Questionnaires and
blood sampling occasions
Number The Västerbotten Project Cohort 1985
- 82 000
The Northern Sweden Monica Cohort
13 000 from 1986,
1990, 1994, 1999 ( follow up), 2004
( 4 500)
The Västerbotten Mammary Screening Cohort 1995
- 47 000
Unique individuals
85 000
3Possibilities and problems of conducting long
term cancer epidemiology based on biobanks
4? Some experiences from the NSHDS ? Statements
on how to promote science
5Surprises in prostate cancer research?Risk
factors with an unexpected behaviour
6WHO BIENNIAL REPORT 2001-2002, IARC, France 2001.
7(No Transcript)
8Table 1. Relative risk of cancer according to
plasma glucose levels in the Northern Sweden
Health and Disease cohort
9(No Transcript)
10Table 4. Odds ratios of prostate cancer by
quintiles of serum levels of free testosterone
11(No Transcript)
12(No Transcript)
13- Conclusion prostate cancer
- ? It is evident that the story of surprises will
continue. - ? We will always be confused on a higher level.
- ? That is also called scientific development.
14Experiences in colorectal cancer research?Risk
factors which are difficult to communicate
15WHO BIENNIAL REPORT 2001-2002, IARC, France 2001.
16Meat, Fish, and Colorectal Cancer Risk The
European Prospective Investigation into Cancer
and Nutrition Teresa Norat, Sheila Bingham,
Pietro Ferrari, Nadia Slimani, Mazda Jenab,
Mathieu Mazuir, Kim Overvad, Anja Olsen, Anne
Tjønneland, Francoise Clavel, Marie-Christine
Boutron-Ruault, Emmanuelle Kesse, Heiner Boeing,
Manuela M. Bergmann, Alexandra Nieters, Jakob
Linseisen, Antonia Trichopoulou, Dimitrios
Trichopoulos, Yannis Tountas, Franco Berrino,
Domenico Palli, Salvatore Panico, Rosario Tumino,
Paolo Vineis, H. Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita, Petra H.
M. Peeters, Dagrun Engeset, Eiliv Lund, Guri
Skeie, Eva Ardanaz, Carlos González, Carmen
Navarro, J. Ramón Quirós, MarÃa-José Sanchez,
Göran Berglund, Irene Mattisson, Göran Hallmans,
Richard Palmqvist, Nicholas E. Day, Kay-Tee Khaw,
Timothy J. Key, Miguel San Joaquin, Bertrand
Hémon, Rodolfo Saracci, Rudolf Kaaks, Elio
Riboli Journal of the National Cancer
Institute, Vol. 97, No. 12, 906-916, 2005
17Norat T et al, JNCI 200597906-916.
18Hazard ratios (HRs) per 100-g increase in intake
and 95 confi dence intervals (CIs) were
calculated for calibrated intakes of fish
Norat T et al, JNCI 200597906-916.
19Red and processed meat increases risk of
colorectal cancer particularly in people who eat
little lt 17 g fibre
Fibre
Meat
(gt17, 28, lt28g fibre. Interaction p 0.06 Norat
et al, JNCI 2005, submitted)
20Meat Consumption and Risk of Colorectal Cancer ?
Higher risk of distal colon cancer associated
with processed meat (RR, 1.50 95 confidence
interval CI, 1.04-2.17), ? High consumption of
red meat reported in 1992/1993 was associated
with higher risk of rectal cancer (RR, 1.71 95
CI, 1.15-2.52 P.007 for trend), ? Long term
consumption of poultry and fish was inversely
associated with risk of both proximal and distal
colon cancer.
Chao A et al. JAMA
2005293172-182.
21Larsson et al. Int J Cancer 2005113829-834.
22(No Transcript)
23(No Transcript)
24World Cancer Research Fund American Institute
for Cancer Research Food Nutrition and the
Prevention of Cancer a global perspective. 1997,
pp 30.
25Japanese National Nutritional Survey during
the last 50 years Increase intake of
? milk 20-fold ? meat 9-fold ?
eggs 7-fold ? animal fat and vegetable oil
6-fold ? fruit 3-fold. Kuriki K et al.
Nutr Cancer 20055170-177.
26(No Transcript)
27World Cancer Research Fund American Institute
for Cancer Research Food Nutrition and the
Prevention of Cancer a global perspective. 1997,
pp 50.
28Conclusion ? The results on meat and colorectal
cancer are stongly supported!
29A seminar with journalists 20 years ago How
will you help us to spread our messages?
30SÖNDAG 3 JULI 2005 DN.
31(No Transcript)
32SÖNDAG 3 JULI 2005 DN.
33SÖNDAG 3 JULI 2005 DN.
34At the end of the story Eat, drink and be happy.
The only real threats are smoking, to much
alcohol, to much sun exposure, overweight and
physical inactivity.
35Conclusions from Focus DN,
SUNDAY 3 JULY 2005 1 ? The article was
generally received very well ? All information
was correct ? Are the conclusions of the
consumers correct? ? What is the effect of the
message on meat and HRT? ? Do the consumers care
any longer?
36 What are the roles of scientists and
journalists? ? To present valid information! ?
Marketing of their messages! ? Difficult to do
with limited space!
37The challenge for both are to reach the consumers
with a correct message they ? Understand and
believe ? Not get offended by
38Genetic studies give further support!
39Interaction between family history of colorectal
cancer in first-degree relatives and health and
lifestyle factors and risk of colorectal
cancer ___________________________________________
____________________
No Family History Yes Family History p Value p
Value OR (95 CI)a
OR (95 CI) additive
multiplicative ___________________________________
____________________________ Western diet
Low 1.00
1.24 (0.801.92) 0.02 0.03
Intermediate 1.15 (0.981.35) 1.82
(1.402.36) High 1.45
(1.181.77) 3.59 (2.295.62) ___________________
____________________________________________ a
All variables in logisitic models along with
study, age, sex except for sigmoidoscopy
screening and HRT. Sigmoidoscopy screening
excluded from model because of 124 cases and 195
controls missing data.
Adopted fromm Slattery ML et al. Cancer
cause contrl 200314884.
40Sachse C et al. Carcinogenisis 2002231839-1849.
41Dietary advise based on genetics vision for the
future
Blood samples
Computerized risk assessment
Dietary advice
Genotyping
42Welcome to the NuGO Weblog The Nutrigenomics
Organisation is carried by scientists. This
weblog is the place were they speak out loud
about their passion NutriGenomics.
43Studies using specific biomarkers a possibility
for the future!
44Red meat and colorectal cancer
Adopted from Amanda J et al. Env Molec Mutag
20044444-45
45The position of the scientists
46How do scientists succeed in biobank research??
- ? Interest and knowledge
- ? Motivation and provocation
- ? Energy and devotion
- ? Skill and smartness
- ? Decades (?) of work and sacrifice
47Highlights of Medical Biobank Research
Etiology of cancer (HPV) Serology and
tissue-PCR Early diagnosis and prevention of
disease
48The position of the scientists must be protected!
49General management of a biobank
50Procedures for project evaluation
? Approval by the Boards of Experts
? Approval by the Research Ethics Committee
? Approval by the Medical Biobank
51Quality Control
- ? A system for quality control must cover all
...activities in the biobank, some main points - Ownership, legal issues
- Logistics and sample handling
- Ethics, security
52Statement by the Joint Steering Committee of the
Medical Biobank
- There are two major parties involved in
signing the contracts in a university, the
scientists and the funding organisations . - Both the university and the scientists have a
legal responsibility.
53------ that the principal investigators in each
country have legal responsibilities for the
proper custody and use of both biological samples
and data from their cohort, wherever
held,------
Statement of the EPIC Steering Committee
15 October 2003
54END
55(No Transcript)
56SÖNDAG 3 JULI 2005 DN.
57SÖNDAG 3 JULI 2005 DN.
58Colorectal cancer risk associated with family
history of colorectal cancer can be reduced
through having ? screening sigmoidoscopies, ?
eating a healthy diet, ? not smoking cigarettes,
? and maintaining a BMI below 25.
Slattery ML et al. Cancer cause contrl
200314879-887.
59The European Nutrigenomics Organisation
 linking genomics, nutrition and health research
(NuGO)
60Nnutrients and gene expression
Diet
                                     Â
Nutrients
Metabolism
Genexpression
Phenotype variation
61Genetiska associations studier
62Nutritional genomics, or nutrigenomics ?
Interaction of the genome with its nutritional
environment. ? Determine what foods and
nutrients and how much an individual should eat
to maintain an optimal health.
63EARLY DIAGNOSIS What precedes development of
RA? Klareskog, Alfredsson, Rantapää et al.
64- Combined autoantibodies to cyclic citrullinated
peptide (CCP) and HLA-DRB1 locus antigens is
strongly associated - with future onset of rheumatoid arthritis.
- ? OR 66.8, 95 CI 8.3-539.4 in predicting RA
- ? Only anti-CCP ab OR 25.01, 95 CI
2.8-222.2 - .
- Berglin E et al. Arthritis Res Ther
20046(4)R303-R308.
65Rheumatoid arthritis
- ? Low prevalence in Mediterranean countries
-
- ? Cretan diet reduces disease activity
- Linda Hagfors, Thesis Umeå University
2003
66Vision Rheumatoid arthritisTreatment before
clinical symtoms??
67The final Statement of the Research Ethics
Committee, Dec. 2003
- ? The Medical Biobank should have a principle
investigator. - ? The Declaration of Helsinki should be followed
by the Medical Biobank. - ? 9, 15 and 22 in the Declaration of Helsinki
have not been followed by the authorities.
68The Declaration of Helsinki  approval to a
specially appointed ethical review committee,
which must be independent of the investigator,
the sponsor or any other kind of undue
influence. The researcher should also submit to
the committee, for review, information regarding
funding, sponsors, institutional affiliations,
other potential conflicts of interest and
incentives for subjects. Â Conclusion The
statement is clear, the scientist is submitting
the ethical application and has the
responsibility.
69The Declaration of Nürnberg  The declaration of
Nürnberg is regarded as the basic document for
ethics of research in humans. Â The duty and
responsibility for ascertaining the quality of
the consent rests upon each individual who
initiates, directs or engages in the experiment.
It is a personal duty and responsibility which
may not be delegated to another with
impunity. Â Conclusion A principle investigator
is not allowed to transfer the legal and moral
responsibility to the authorities.
70Hilary Rose, Nature 2003 204 123-124.
71Heavey PM et al. Nutr Cancer 200448124-141.
72Heavey PM et al. Nutr Cancer 200448124-141.
73Nutrigenomics ? Pharmacogenomics has led to the
concept of personalized medicine. Nutrigenomics
open the way for personalized nutrition. ?
Nutrigenomics should enable individuals to manage
better their health by matching their diets with
their unique genetic makeup. ? Relevant for the
whole population or for specific groups?
74(No Transcript)
75Highlights of Medical Biobank Research
Etiology of diseases (e.g. HPV)
Identification of new risk factors/indicators
Early diagnosis of diseases
76Hormones, gene polymorphisms cancer risk (2)
NCI Breast Prostate Cohort Consortium Project
on Hormones and Gene Variants
77(No Transcript)
78MIGRANT STUDIES Migration studies proves beyond
reasonable doubt that genetic factors can not be
primarily responsible for the large difference in
cancer rates in different regions and countries.
World Cancer Research Fund American Institute
for Cancer Research Food Nutrition and the
Prevention of Cancer a global perspective. 1997.
79Statement by the Joint Steering Committee of the
Medical Biobank
- In Swedish universities the authorities are
expected to decide if they can accept that the
university can receive the contract and to check
that the contracts are followed by the
scientists.
80Statement by the Joint Steering Committee of the
Medical Biobank
- The scientists also have a legal responsibility
for their actions and contracts. If contracts are
to be changed they must be re-negotiated (a
statement also made by the Medical biobank
auditor).
81World Cancer Research Fund American Institute
for Cancer Research Food Nutrition and the
Prevention of Cancer a global perspective. 1997,
pp 32.
82(No Transcript)
83(No Transcript)