A1260054075aGTzR - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 4
About This Presentation
Title:

A1260054075aGTzR

Description:

Compare tritium removal from flibe and from Pb-17Li (C. Gentile) Containment concepts to minimize size and shielding (C. Gentile) ... ( C Gentile/R. Raffray) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:24
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 5
Provided by: advanceden
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A1260054075aGTzR


1
Magnetic Intervention Chamber Core
  • The overall MI core includes
  • - Blanket armor
  • - Shield
  • - Ion dumps
  • - Vacuum vessel
  • - Coils
  • - Biological shield
  • - Heat transfer vault (if separate)
  • - Laser ports
  • - Building design for maintenance, pumping etc
  • Several possible overall design configurations
  • - A few have already been circulated
  • List of givens and druthers to help develop
    design
  • This meeting is to converge on preferable
    choice of chamber core

2
Givens for HAPL MI Chamber Core
  • Beam ports 40, per Malcolms positioning
  • Beam port orientation vertical, 61 aspect ratio
  • Beam port geometry as worked out by Malcolm and
    Mohamed
  • Field coil cross section 0.8 m x 0.8 m
  • Field coils/blanket held by separate entities
  • Field coil held by external structure that can
    withstand repulsive force (approx. 107 lb for
    larger coils, 2 x 106 lb for smaller coils) (Do
    these translate to 45 and 9 MN, respectively?)
  • Chamber radius gt 5 m
  • Chamber shape bi-conical
  • Blanket thickness sufficient for breeding 
  • Blanket topology allows low-resistance azimuthal
    current path
  • Vacuum system capable of 1 mTorr or better
  • Biological shield cannot be opened for
    maintenance
  • Blanket is not sufficient neutron shield
  • Steel/water shield thickness required between
    blanket and field coils 0.5 m
  • Steel/water shield thickness required between
    blanket and VV for reweldability 0.3 m
  • Biological shield thickness required behind
    blanket/shield/VV 1.5 m
  • Biological shield thickness required behind beam
    ports 2.5 m
  • Ion dump ring at equator and pockets at the poles
    (Toroidal dump nominally 1 m high, 12.5 m
    radius)

3
Druthers for HAPL MI Chamber Core
  • Access to blanket does not require re-welding
    beam ports
  • Target injector 15 degrees above bottom dead
    center
  • Chamber radius at mid-plane 6 m
  • Blanket thickness 0.7 m at mid-plane increasing
    to 1.1 m at top/bottom
  • Chamber oriented with polar axis vertical
  • Access to blanket does not require disconnecting
    (or moving) beam ports
  • Accommodate blanket designs that can be removed
    straight up.
  • Preferred blanket design SiCf/SiC Pb-17Li or
    flibe
  • Field coil positions R3.4 m, Z 5.0 m, R 6.1
    m, Z 2.25 (move outward requires increase in
    current)
  • Minimize mass to be lifted for access
  • Minimize height of components to be lifted
  • Minimize evacuated volume
  • Minimize thermal stresses in particular when
    attaching components with different operating
    temperatures (e.g. blanket to vacuum vessel or
    coil to structure)
  • Design ion dump chambers so as not to affect the
    main chamber environment
  • Position shield (flux conservation boundary) as
    far away from blanket to maximize magnetic energy
    resistive dissipation in blanket

4
Action Items for HAPL MI Chamber Core
  • Compare tritium removal from flibe and from
    Pb-17Li (C. Gentile)
  • Containment concepts to minimize size and
    shielding (C. Gentile)
  • Include all ancillary rooms/vaults in layout
    (HTS, Tritium, Pumping, Target Injection) (C.
    Gentile/check with M. Sawan on shielding
    requirements)
  • Formalize vacuum pumping system through laser
    ports (C. Gentile)
  • Minimize coil weight and cost (possibility of
    using Rutherford configuration (F. Dahlgren)
  • Temporal and spatial ion energy distribution on
    dumps (B. Robson)
  • Dump design including armor configuration and
    maintenance (R. Raffray/G. Sviatoslavsky)
  • HX material size (R. Raffray/ G.
    Sviatoslavsky)
  • Blanket attachment and maintenance scheme with
    smaller opening for both main blanket region and
    upper/lower blanket regions (C. Priniski/G.
    Sviatoslavsky)
  • Beam shielding, support and attachment outside
    biological shield (G. Sviatoslavsky/M. Sawan)
  • Thickness of blanket for VV to be reweldable
    (M. Sawan)
  • How to maintain tight fit etween adjacent
    blanket modules.use of compliant layer
    (Graphfoyl??) (PPPL)
  • Failure mode effect analysis - check TFTR
    experience, others? (C Gentile/R. Raffray)
  • Assessment of blanket fabrication properties
    (SiC/SiC) (L. Snead/ G. Sviatoslavsky)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com