LCLS Linac Technical Design Review Charge - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 2
About This Presentation
Title:

LCLS Linac Technical Design Review Charge

Description:

The purpose of the Linac TDR is to carry out an integrated ... Section II. Bulleted sections. Comments. Cite any open design issues and/or missing components ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:49
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 3
Provided by: heinzdie
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: LCLS Linac Technical Design Review Charge


1
LCLS Linac Technical Design Review Charge
  • The purpose of the Linac TDR is to carry out an
    integrated examination and assessment of the
    technical design of the LCLS Linac System. In
    carrying out its charge, the committee should
    review and evaluate the scope of the Linac
    System, in consideration of the following
  • Do the performance specifications for the Linac
    provide an adequate basis for evaluation of the
    Linac design?
  • Is the Linac preliminary design adequate ,
    including any specifications, to meet the LCLS
    performance functions and requirements?
  • Are all ESH and technical requirements
    adequately addressed by the structures, systems
    and components incorporated into the Linac
    preliminary design?
  • Is the preliminary design of the Linac defined to
    the extent that its basis can be used to set the
    baseline cost and schedule, including
    contingency?
  • Is the Linac work scope organized logically such
    that its management team can successfully
    construct, install and commission its
    deliverables?

2
LCLS Linac Technical Design Review Charge
  • We would like to get a short, concise report (2-3
    pages) from the review team with a general
    assessment of technical maturity followed by
    recommendations/action items. The following
    format is proposed
  • Section I. General assessment of the overall
    Linac scope and design maturity based upon the
    previous questions.
  • Section II. Bulleted sections
  • Comments
  • Cite any open design issues and/or missing
    components
  • Cite any areas of risk and/or any suggestions for
    follow-up RD
  • Cite any potential conflicts with a shared use of
    the SLAC Accelerator and Controls.
  • Recommendations and/or Action Items
  • Cite any recommendations and/or action items that
    the committee feels should be addressed.
  • Cite any overly optimistic expectations or
    assumptions which require further investigation.
  • This report will be very helpful in preparing for
    a DOE Performance Baseline review in April 2004.
  • We thank the committee in advance for taking time
    out of their busy schedules to provide this
    important feedback on the LCLS Linac design.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com