Title: PRESENTATION OF THE PROPOSED SECURITY INDUSTRY REGULATION BILL, 2001
1- PRESENTATION OF THE PROPOSED SECURITY INDUSTRY
REGULATION BILL, 2001 -
- by
- Francois Slabbert
- Manager Legislation and Policy Development
- 02 May 2001
2INTRODUCTORY OBSERVATION
- To our understanding certain operations,
operational divisions and personnel of Telkom are
required to comply with specific provisions of
the Bill, which in terms of its objects is meant
to apply to the private security, private
investigations and related industries only.
3BUSINESS UNITS POTENTIALLY EFFECTED BY THE BILL
- The following in-house operational units,
functionaries and support personnel of Telkom
are potentially effected by the Bill - its in-house security and investigations section,
- its market research section,
- its market intelligence section,
- its mergers and acquisitions section,
4- its credit control section,
- its collections division,
- its personnel division,
- its risk management section, and
- its information technology (IT) security
division.
5ADDITIONAL REGULATIONS FOR REGULATED INDUSTRIES
- The aforementioned functional units,
functionaries and support personnel will fall
under the jurisdiction of and be regulated or
prescribed to by inter alia
6- the Security Industries Regulations Act
- regulations promulgated pursuant thereto
- the Minister of Safety and Security
- the Security Industry Regulatory Authority
- the Security Officers Board and
- the code of conduct for security service
providers.
7REGISTRATION AS SECURITY SERVICE PROVIDER
- Telkom and other non-security entities might
arguably be obliged either to - register as security service provider with the
Security Industry Regulatory Authority, or - if unable to comply with the qualifying
registration criteria or a failure to obtain
exemption from the Minister close down its
business investigations, intelligence and
associated activities.
8OBJECT OF THE BILL
- The sole stated purpose of the Bill is "To
provide for the regulation of the security
industry for that purpose to establish a
regulatory authority and to provide for mattes
connected therewith".
9MOTIVATION FOR THE EXCLUSION OF NON-SECURITY
INDUSTRIES FROM THE APPLICATION OF THE BILL
- Telkom submits that as a public company -duly
incorporated in terms of the Companies Act of
1973 with as its principle object the rendering
telecommunications services- it should be
exonerated in all of its capacities from
compliance with any of the provisions of the
Bill.
10- It is submitted that only those persons or
entities that have as their principal business
objective the rendition of security or associated
services do in fact belong to the security
industry or constitutes a security business
within the meaning of the object of the Bill.
11PROVISIONS THAT MAY IMPACT ON TELKOM'S
OPERATIONAL AND BUSINESS INTERESTS
- The definitions and other provisions hereafter
listed probably has the cumulative effect of
making the Security Industry Regulation Bill
applicable on Telkom's management, employees,
activities, operations, business associations and
activities to a greater or lesser extent the
relevant provisions being
12- the definition of "code of conduct"
- the definition of "private Investigator"
- the definition of "security equipment"
- the definition of "security industry"
- the definition of "security officer"
- the definition of "security service"
- the definition of "security service provider"
13- the definition of "the Act"
- section 2 of the Bill
- section 20 of the Bill, and
- section 28 of the Bill
- These provisions, are potentially onerous,
disruptive, and harmful to Telkom's business and
operational interests, and will more fully be
dealt with hereafter.
14The Implicit Distinction between "Security
Service Provider" and "Security Business"
- Persons " using their employees to protect
or safeguard merely their own property and
other interests, or persons or property on the
premises or under the control of such person "
are excluded from the definition of "security
business" but apparently not from the definition
of "security service" or of "security service
provider".
15- Although the insertion of the phrase "for
remuneration or reward" in relation to "security
service provider" may have the effect of
excluding Telkom in certain instances, it does
not have a similar effect on its security
investigations and intelligence personnel.
16- The obligation to register with the Security
Industries Authority and compliance with the
industry code, for instance, will apparently
apply to Telkom equally if is binding on members
of its staff.
17The Definition of "Private Investigator"
- The definition in the Bill of "private
investigator" includes most of the activities
normally performed by Telkom's security and
investigations, IT security, business
intelligence and many other sections also. This
definition contained in section 1 of the Bill
effectively transforms Telkom into a private
investigator with all the attendant obligations
of the Bill being imposed and binding on it.
18The Definitions of "Security Officer", "Security
Service" and "Security Industry"
- A "security officer" is defined as someone who is
employed by another and performs for remuneration
one or more security services. The definition
includes many of Telkom's employees who render
"security services" aimed at protecting company
property, particularly in the form of incorporeal
property such as business interests, but also the
installation and servicing of "security
equipment" and the monitoring of signals or
transmissions from electronic security equipment.
We have already noted that in terms of the Bill
these personnel, as well as their supervisors and
managers are all regarded as security service
providers in their own right and therefore
subject to all the provisions of the Bill
relating to security service providers.
19CONCLUSIONS
- Whilst it has undoubtedly become imperative for
the security and private investigation services
industries to be regulated, the introduction of
measures aimed at achieving that end should be
contained within the confines of its original
objectives and to the security industry in
particular.
20- Within the modern competitive business
environment the services of efficient
investigations, security and intelligence
functionaries within commercial companies have
become more than just a convenience. Businesses
have come to rely on these functions to formulate
policies and strategies on which continued
competitiveness and profitability, and even its
very existence depends.
21- In that sense and in that environment it is
extremely undesirable for either the operations
themselves or for the staff performing those
functions to be subject to undue regulation,
disruption, scrutiny or interrogation. Because
market forces and market movements are so
volatile, timing is often vital to the effect and
worth of the performance of an act or of the
conclusion of a transaction or listing so that
and any untimely interference or stoppage could
amount to an effective derailment.
22RECOMMENDATIONS
- In view of the aforementioned considerations it
is submitted that, notwithstanding any contrary
provision or interpretation of the Bill, all
in-house security, investigations and
intelligence functions performed by commercial
companies -that do not have as their principal
business the provision of security or private
investigation services to third parties- be
expressly excluded from the application of the
Bill.
23- It is further submitted that the definition of
"private investigator" in section 1 of the Bill
be amended by the insertion of the following
words at the end of the section "but shall
exclude any business intelligence operations
which a company may undertake in the course and
scope of its normal and reasonable endeavours to
safeguard its security, strategic, operational,
and business interests and that of its holding
company or subsidiaries."
24