Supportive Leadership - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Supportive Leadership

Description:

'Groups are inclined toward stupidity the more they believe an answer lies ... Marla Deem, Board President Mdeem_at_CreditUnion1.org ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: david1075
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Supportive Leadership


1
Supportive Leadership
  • Getting Behind Your Teachers to Lead

Rantoul Township High School District 193
2
Traditional leadership model
3
Collective Wisdom Model
  • Groups are inclined toward stupidity the more
    they believe an answer lies outside themselves,
    including a belief that an answer lies with the
    leader.
  • Inversely, when a leader brings attention to the
    challenges and complexity that are inherent to
    the circumstances a group faces together, group
    members can begin to bring their own unique
    talents and special qualities.
  • Alan Briskin, blog at http//heartlandcircle.blogs
    .com/circle/2007/03/collective_wisd.html

4
Instead of teacher buy-in.
We asked the question
What would happen if we require the
administration and board to buy in to an idea?
5
Where did we start?
  • We had a problem
  • Graduation rate had fallen to 65
  • We had an AYP problem and more importantly, a
    problem with not enough students graduating in
    our community.
  • It was a big problem.

6
Our options
  • We could have gathered the board and community to
    think of what we can do.
  • We could have gathered out Administrative
    Leadership Team to find a program to institute to
    respond to the program.
  • We could have asked the teachers and then done
    what the board wanted to anyway.
  • We could have just ignored the problem.
  • We could ask the teachers to exercise collective
    wisdom to find a solution.

7
What did we do?
  • Went to the teachers as a group and began a
    dialogue within the faculty.
  • Started by stating the problem and then we asked
    the teachers.
  • What will you be telling a reporter about how we
    turned our graduation rate problem around 5 years
    from now?

8
We asked them to brainstorm
  • No matter the cost
  • No thought of practicality
  • No argument
  • No commentary on other ideas
  • or people
  • Just ideas

9
Did they have any ideas?
  • 224 of them

10
With that mountain of ideas
  • We stopped for a deep breath.
  • Not permanently but we waited to let those begin
    to soak in for a while.
  • We did not take over the process.
  • We waited for it to develop within.
  • We set up a re-visitation of the issue for the
    faculty to begin to refine the ideas.

11
We gathered our wisdom again
  • We presented the 224 ideas for the teachers to
    combine, categorize, reduce duplication and
    prioritize.
  • This was done as a whole with facilitation.
  • Categories were suggested by the faculty as we
    wrestled with the problem of reducing the ideas.
  • They reduced to three big areas we could pursue
    in further study and analysis.

12
Then the tough part..
  • Everybody signs up to study one of the three
    ideas
  • Creates cross-disciplinary teams to work toward a
    common goal including collaboration between
    regular ed and special ed
  • The existing collective wisdom is increased by
    study to gather more information

13
The Alternative Ed Study Group
  • Carefully evaluated the needs to address the
    right problem
  • Gathered research on alternative programs
  • Studied existing programs in other districts
  • Avoided repeating a previous model but took
    elements that seemed useful for the current needs
  • Analyzed costs with directions to plan the best
    program for the students to see if the district
    could afford the best

14
The Alternative Ed Study Group
  • Studied staffing needs, facility needs, resource
    and equipment needs
  • Prepared a report including all elements and
    requirements
  • Set out the full outline of how the program would
    operate
  • Reviewed the proposal with the administration
  • Invited teachers to attend the board meeting
    where the proposal was presented33 of the
    faculty attended

15
Meanwhile, back at the board
  • Board was not directly involved in study or
    planning
  • Board was informed of the ongoing process and
    upcoming result by administration
  • Board checked resource availability with
    administration before presentation

16
Meanwhile, back at the board
  • Board listened to a professional presentation of
    the plan
  • Board supported its teachers in the improvement
    effort
  • Leadership came through support and encouragement
    of teacher ideas, creativity and planning with
    resources

17
What is the big idea?
  • A school board can provide leadership by giving
    the teachers an opportunity to develop solutions
    to school improvement and supporting that effort.
    Together the board and teachers made a
    difference.
  • By using the collective wisdom of the teachers
    and supporting their efforts, the district has a
    successful program.
  • How successful?

18
Eagle Academy
  • Students who were not graduating earned full
    diplomas and the AYP requirement for graduation
    was met in one year.

19
Any questions?
? ? ? ? ? ?
20
Thank you for attending.
  • You can contact us at
  • Eagle Academy
  • Rantoul Township High School
  • Sandy Davis, Principal sdavis_at_rths.k12.il.us
  • Mindy Moberg, Lead Teacher mmoberg_at_rths.k12.il.us
  • Marla Deem, Board President Mdeem_at_CreditUnion1.org
  • This presentation will be on our web site on
    Monday for you to copy if you wish.
  • www.rths.k12.il.us
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com