Slajd 1

1
(No Transcript)
2

• TYPE OF ELABORATION
• Study of a troublesome suburbian zones of the
  city of Olsztyn
• A continuation of the spatial policy
• The Study carries out the spatial policy covered
  in the Strategy for Socio-Economic Development
  of the Region of Warmia and Mazury and in The
  Plan of Spatial Development of the Region of
  Warmia and Mazury

3

• The purpose of the study
• The Study will be a source of information for
  local goverment of every level on the regional
  problems, which will require taking actions
  commonly, organising regional undertakings and
  investments in this area, as well as resolving
  conflict between developing cities and
  neighbouring communes.
• STAGES OF THE ELABORATION
• Troblesome region boundaries recognision
• Evaluation of the actual state and a recognision
  of development preconditions
• Defining the direction of development

4
PROCEDURAL AND LEGAL CONDITIONS

• Recording the troublesome region in the spatial
  development plan of a region
• Valid Conception of the Spatial Development of
  the Country passed by the Parliament on the 17th
  November 2000.
• Rejection of the updated CSDC, elaborated by the
  Goverment Centre for Stategy Studies, by
  Parliament in 2005.
• The valid 2003 Planning Act lacks regulations on
  ways of defining boundaries of troublesome
  regions, making plans for these areas and carring
  out the plans
• Formation, by the Prime Minister, of the group
  working on new law acts projects relating to the
  spatial planning system.
• The lack of legal basis for considering the city
  of Olsztyn and its neighbourhood areas as a
  metropolitan region.

5
APPROVED RULES FOR DETERMINING AREAS BOUNDARIES

• THE RULE OF THE MAXIMUM DISTANCE
• THE RULE OF THE CLOSE NEIGHBOURHOOD
• CONSISTENCY RULE

6
THE APPROVED CRITERIA

• SOCIO-ECONOMIC CRITERIA
• CRITERIA DESCRIBING THE ECONOMY AND ENTERPRISE
• CRITERIA OF ENVIRONMENTAL ATTRACTIVENESS
• TRANSPORT LINKS
• LINKS BETWEEN THE TECHNICAL INFRASTRUCTURE
  SYSTEMS
• COMMUNE UNIONS

7
SOCIO-ECONOMIC CRITERIA

• DYNAMICS OF POPULATION CHANGES
• POPULATION DENSITY IN RURAL AREAS
• SETTLEMENT NETWORK
• DENSITY OF THE RURAL BUILD-UP AREAS
• POPULATION EMPLOYED IN NON-AGRICULTURAL SECTOR
• LEVEL OF EMPLOYMENT
• UNEMPLOYMNET

8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
CRITERIA DESCRIBING THE ECONOMY AND ENTERPRISE

• POTENTIAL OF THE ECONOMY MEASURED WITH THE NUMBER
  OF BUSNESS ENTITIES REGISTERED IN THE REGON
  SYSTEM
• LEVEL OF THE ENTERPRISE DESCRIBED BY THE NUMBER
  OF (PRIVATE BUSINESSES) Plants IN PRIVATE SECTOR
• THE POTENTIAL OF THE PRODUCTION INDUSTRIAL
  PLANTS
• AGRICULTURE

13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
CRITERIA OF THE ATTRACTIVENESS OF THE ENVIRONMENT

• TOURIST ROUTES
• VIRTUES OF NATURE
• NATIONAL HERITAGE

18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
TRANSPORT LINKS

• NUMBER OF VEHICLES ON THE MAJOR AND LOCAL ROADS
• THE NUMBER OF PASSENGER CARRIES
• TRAINS
• COACHES
• PRIVATE CARRIERS

22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
LINKS BETWEEN TECHNICAL INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS

• LINKS BETWEEN COMMUNE SEWAGE SYSTEMS AND
  OLSZTYNS SEWAGE PLANT
• LINKS BETWEEN THE COMUNE WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS AND
  OLSZTYNS WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM
• PUBLIC WASTES MANAGEMENT

27
(No Transcript)
28
(No Transcript)
29
(No Transcript)
30
(No Transcript)
31
TROUBLESOME AREA CHOSEN AS A RESULT OF THE REGION
BOUNDARIES RECOGNITION

• POINT VALORISATION OF PARTICULAR CRITERIA
• COMMUNES ARE RATED AS THE AREA AFTER GATHERING
  MINIMUM 44 POINTS TREATED AS THE AVARAGE NUMBER
  OF POINTS FOR THE ASSESSED REGION
• INCLUSION OF THE RURAL COMMUNE AREAS, THESE WHICH
  GET SMALLER NUMBER OF PIONTS, BUT WHICH ARE
  LOCATED AROUND CITIES FOLLOWING THE ACCEPTED RULE
  OF CONTINUITY

32
(No Transcript)
33
TROUBLESOME AREA CHOSEN AS A RESULT OF THE REGION
BOUNDARIES RECOGNITION
CITY OF OLSZTYN

• COUNTY OF LIDZBAR communes
• Lidzbark Warminski
• COUNTY OF OSTRÓDA communes
• Ostróda
• Morag
• Milomlyn
• Lukta
• COUNTY OF SZCZYTNO communes
• Szczytno
• Pasym
• COUNTY OF NIDZICA communes
• Nidzica

• COUNTY OF OLSZTYN communes
• Lidzbark Warminski
• Stawiguda
• Purda
• Barczewo
• Biskupiec
• Jeziorany
• Dobre Miasto
• Dywity
• Jonkowo
• Gietrzwald

Suggested expansion includes following communes
Kolno, Swiatki (county of Olsztyn), Dzwierzuty,
Jedwabno (county of Szczytno)
34
TROUBLESOME AREA CHOSEN AS A RESULT OF THE REGION
BOUNDARIES RECOGNITION

• SUBURBIAN AREA OCCUPIES 4.840 km2 OF GROUND
• POPULATION OF THE AREA IS 274,2 THOUSANDS OF
  PEOPLE
• THE AREA OCCUPIES THE 4.928 km2 OF GROUND ALONG
  WITH THE CITY OF OLSZTYN , WHICH IS 20 OF THE
  TERRITORY OF THE REGION
• IT IS INHABITED BY 448,1 THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE,
  WHICH IS 31,4 OF THE POPULATION OF THE REGION

35
TROUBLESOME AREA CHOSEN AS A RESULT OF THE REGION
BOUNDARIES RECOGNITION

• THE AREA WITH THE SUGGESTED EXPANSION BY 4
  COMMUNES OCCUPIES 5.845 km2 OF GROUND
• IT IS INHABITED BY 466,1 THOUSANDS OF RESIDENTS

36
(No Transcript)
37
FUTURE STUDIES

• We are currently working on the second part of
  the study investigating the territory of
  particulary chosen communes only
• The first results reveal that suburbian zone
  includes six communes only commune of Dywity,
  Barczewo, Purda, Stawiguda, Gietrzwald, Jonkowo
  and very few of Olsztynek

38
(No Transcript)
39
FUTURE STUDIES

• Those communes are closely linked with the city
  of Olsztyn
• A bypass of Olsztyn will go through those
  communes
• People who move not from Olsztyn, build houses in
  those communes
• Those communes release sewage treatement plant in
  Olsztyn
• Rubbish from those communes is disposed at the
  same waste dump
• Public busses get to those communes from Olsztyn
• Residents of those communes use schools,
  hospitals and any other fascilities and services
  in Olsztyn
• Residents of those communes are working in
  Olsztyn but paying taxes in theirs communes
• BY THE END OF DECEMBER THE DETAILED CASE STUDY
  DESCRIBING TOWN-SUBURBS RELATIONS WILL HAVE BEEN
  FINISHED. THAT IS WHY I WILL PROVIDE OU WITH THE
  RESULTS AT THE NEXT MEETING, IF SUCH ONE IS HELD

40
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION