eGov Towards Effectiveness in Public Administration - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 40
About This Presentation
Title:

eGov Towards Effectiveness in Public Administration

Description:

in France, Germany, UK, and USA (Dorgan and Dowdy, 2004) How much to invest into ICT? ... Pou vajte element MAP a text pre akt vne oblasti. Multim di . ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:69
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 41
Provided by: jan1185
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: eGov Towards Effectiveness in Public Administration


1
eGov Towards Effectiveness in Public
Administration
  • Tomas Sabol
  • TU Kosice, Faculty of Economics
  • Member of the eEurope Steering Group (Expert
    Chamber)
  • Tomas.Sabol_at_tuke.sk

2
Overview of the presentation
  • Definition of eGov, eGov Aims
  • Critical Success factors
  • Benefits and Measuring eGov programmes
  • Action Plan eEurope
  • Any link between Competitiveness and eGov?
  • Social Inclusion/Exclusion, WAI, PIAP
  • e-Procurement
  • Reengineering
  • How much to invest into ICT?
  • Webocracy Project

3
Definitions
  • e-Government Interaction of PA with citizens
    businesses using Internet
  • e-Gov The use of ICT in public administrations
    combined with organisational change and new
    skills in order to improve public services and
    democratic processes and strengthen support to
    public policies
  • e-Democracy Fostering public participation of
    citizens in democratic processes using ICT
  • e-Governance Processes and structures for
    harnessing the potentialities of ICT at various
    levels of government and the public sector and
    beyond ? Good Governance

4
e-Gov Aims
  • Open and transparent public sector (as a part of
    anti-corruption measures) see e.g.
    e-Procurement
  • Inclusive government user-centred, at the
    service of all see e-Inclusion/e-Exclusion,
    PIAP
  • Productive public sector value for taxpayers
    money see Measuring eGov Programme Progress
  • But also
  • Increase accessibility of public services (24/7)
  • Responsive PA driven by citizens needs
  • Increase quality of public services,
  • Provide personalised services, new types of
    services

5
e-Gov - as designed by EC
  • Interactive
  • efficiency simplicity of services by joining-up
    administrations
  • enhancing government, enhancing participation in
    democracy
  • Inclusive
  • preventing digital divide, support the
    disadvantaged
  • promoting public Internet and multimedia access
    points
  • Business oriented
  • supplying online transactions for business
  • supporting public/private partnerships
  • Multilingual / Multicultural
  • stimulating cross-border use of services and
    information
  • encouraging public services in more than one
    language
  • Source Presentation of Erkki Liikanen, EC
    commissioner

6
Critical success factors
  • Vision, priorities and strategy
  • Top level IT champion, leadership
  • User-driven approach, user-centred design
  • Reengineering, change of organisational processes
    (and organisational culture)
  • Human resource development, e-skills
  • Interesting content, services
  • Access to Internet for all
  • Trust and security
  • Multiple channel delivery of e-services

7
Five categories of eGov benefits
  • Financial Reduced costs of government
    operations/enhanced revenue collection (e.g.
    eliminate paperwork, printing mailing costs,
    routine procedures, ...)
  • Economic development (e.g. by attracting
    tiurists, investors)
  • Reduced redundancy Consolidating and integrating
    government systems (economy of scale, build it
    once, use it often)
  • Fostering democratic principles (especially
    developing countries)
  • Improved service to citizens and other
    constituencies.

8
Measuring eGov Progress
  • Cost-benefit analysis, net-present value and
    internal rate of return
  • Return on Investment
  • Customer Satisfaction
  • Take-up Rates
  • Benchmarking
  • Usually difficult, but necessary (What cannot be
    measured, cannot be managed)

9
Action Plan e-Europe Government on-line
Electronic access to public services
  • eEUROPE, Ministerial Conference, Warsaw, 11-12
    May 2000
  • Availability of Internet access terminals in
    public places (libraries, museums, community
    centres, etc.). Deadline end 2002
  • Establish an e-marketplace for public
    e-procurement. Deadline end 2003
  • Promote the use of open source software in the
    public sector and e-government best practice
    through exchange of experiences across Europe.
    Deadline end 2002
  • Simplified online administrative procedures for
    business, e.g. fast track procedures to set up a
    company. Deadline end 2003
  • Promote the use of electronic signatures within
    the public sector. Deadline end 2002

10
Link between e-Gov Competitiveness?
  • Criteria of Country competitiveness
  • Economic Performance
  • Government efficiency
  • Business efficiency
  • Infrastructure
  • World Competitiveness Yearbook 2004
  • SK 40 (y. 2003 - 46) (1 - US, 2 Singapore, 3 -
    Canada, .., 28 - EE)
  • EU25 SK -17 (1 - SWE, 2 DK, , 6 EE, 11
    LT, 12 SL, 13 CR)
  • Main issues in SK Availability of capital,
    Education training, RD, Efficiency of PA,
    Basic infrastructure and health sector
  • World Economic Forum (102 national economies) SK
    - 43
  • Government success in ICT promotion 78 (out of
    102)
  • Government prioritization of ICT 75 (out of
    102)
  • Source www02.imd.ch/wcy/, www.weforum.org/pdf/Eur
    ope/Slovak_Republic.pdf, Biatec 8/2004

11
Is Info Society e-Gov only about money?

Note Compare e.g. Slovakia vs Estonia in terms
of Info Society GDP/capita Source P Gaspar,
ICEG European Centre, www.icegec.org
12
Social inclusion, Digital divide
  • e-Inclusion defines the degree to which
    individuals and communities are empowered to
    participate in Information Society (IS).
  • e-Exclusion - those who are excluded from
    participation in IS because of geographical
    location, age (the elderly), health status (the
    disabled), education (skills), social situation
    (low income), gender.
  • The digital divide - measures the gap between
    those who are empowered to participate in IS and
    those who are not.
  • Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI),
    http//www.w3.org/wai - Guidelines for
    accessibility of Web sites for persons with
    special needs (elderly, disabled)

13
WAI criteria applied to PA sites in SK
  • Servers tested using http//bobby.watchfire.com/
  • Citizen - www.obcan.sk
  • Office of the government of SK - www.vlada.gov.sk
  • Meetings of the government - www.rokovania.sk
  • Ministry of Interior, Section of PA -
    www.civil.gov.sk
  • Ministry of Defense - www.mod.gov.sk
  • Ministry of Agriculture - www.mpsr.sk
  • Ministry of Environment - www.lifeenv.gov.sk
  • Town - www.mesto.sk
  • None of the servers satisfies the WAI criteria -
    they do not satisfy criteria with the priority 1
    and 2 (none of the sites satisfies event the
    priority 1 criteria)!
  • Note Today Elderly Disabled 15 of total
    population in Europe in 2020 at the age 80
    about 21 mil. people (est.) Source
    IST-1999-29088 Project PRISMA, http//www.prisma-e
    u.net/
  • Low awareness of e-Inclusion in Slovakia!

14
Digital divide EU15
Source ESDIS report eInclusion revisited, EC,
2004
15
Digital divide NMS CCs
? Rural/urban divide in NMS more significant than
in EU15 Source ESDIS report eInclusion
revisited, EC, 2004
16
Number of PIAPs per 1000 inhabitants
Note Compare SK vs. Estonia (76x), or SK vs.
Romania (23x)
Source eEurope 1st Progress Report and eEurope
NSO Survey, June 2003NB Calculation base for
Hungary changed since 2001 (schools no longer
included)
17
e-Procurement
  • Improving efficiency and competition in public
    procurement
  • Improved transparency and accountability of PA
  • UK aims to save 350 million over 3 years for
    central civil government purchases
  • Ireland aims to save 400 million over 5 years
    (2 of procurement expenditure in the public
    sector)
  • Romania https//e-market.e-licitatie.ro/ (launch
    - March 2002)
  • 1,000 governmental agencies and 8,000 suppliers
  • Estimated savings 70 mil. EUR on 220,000
    transactions
  • Czech Republic e-trziste (2003 12,500
    transactions, total value 36 mil. EUR)
  • Slovakia ???
  • Source eEurope Progress Report, February 2004

18
Reengineering As an essential part of eGov
projects
  • Redesign of processes and procedures
  • AND
  • Acquisition of new skills (training, )
  • Change of mindsets (!)
  • The most difficult part of the project
  • Technology is not the problem. The problem is how
    to use the technology and attitude of people

19
How much to invest into ICT?Firm-level
productivity depending on investment into
IT investment has to go hand-in hand with
management skills
? Principle 20/80 20 in ICT 80 in management
HR
Source Survey by LSE and McKinsley on 100
manufacturing companies in France, Germany, UK,
and USA (Dorgan and Dowdy, 2004)
20
Other issues related to eGov
  • Content (Any content, anytime, anywhere, any
    platform)
  • Interoperability
  • Joined-up services integration and sharing
    resources across departments and institutions
    (interlinking systems, information, ways of
    working)
  • Standards open standards,
  • Open Source SW cost benefits, risk, security,
  • Note Strongly preferred by EC. Any discussion
    in Slovakia?
  • (In some countries, on some PA levels, ... OSS
    is compulsory)
  • Promotion (e.g. awareness of Obcan.sk in 2003
    41 of Internet users, in 2004 29.2 of
    Internet users. Source Survey of PPP, 2004)
  • Failure to put interoperable eGov in place ? ?
    Economic and social costs (expensive,
    unresponsive PA) ?

21
A eGov/eDem solution WEBOCRAT system
  • Result of FP5 IST-1999-20364 Webocracy Project
  • Functionality of web-based WEBOCRAT
  • User-friendly publishing on Web simple Content
    Management System
  • Publication of tenders support for public
    procurement
  • Non-/Moderated discussions e.g. on published
    docs
  • Opinion polling on published docs, discussions,
  • On-line submissions (requests, complaints) - with
    possibility to track their processing status
  • Personalisation user profiles,
  • Notification alerting on new events relevant to
    the user profile
  • Concept-based retrieval automatic retrieval of
    all resources (docs, discussions, pollings, web
    links) relevant to the given concept
  • Security role-based access control etc.
  • All modules integrated by means of a
    Knowledge Model

22
User interface
Log in
Fulltext search
Different types of relevant resources
User profile
Categories
Resources relevant to the selected category
23
Advantages of the WEBOCRAT
  • Easy adaptation to local needs, customizable
    interface
  • Intelligent concept-based retrieval - automatic
    retrieval of content relevant to the given
    concept
  • Integrated modules all resources (docs,
    discussions, pollings, web links, tenders, )
    linked together
  • Open system - easy integration with a legacy
    information system
  • Configurable, modular system
  • Security and Role management
  • Personalised services user profiling
  • Multilingual support a new language can be
    added easily
  • Thin client solution only standard web browser
    required
  • Platform independent tested on Windows, Linux
  • Open source solution
  • WAI
  • Knowledge management
  • Tested in natural settings pilots in UK, SK
    (user survey)

24
Thank you for attention! Tomas.Sabol_at_tuke.sk
25
Public-Private Partnership (PPP)
  • PPP refers to forms of cooperation between public
    authorities and the world of business which aim
    to ensure the funding, construction, renovation,
    management or maintenance of an infrastructure or
    the provision of a service
  • In PA a trend towards outsourcing services
    (driving licenses, management of land records,
    etc.)
  • PA a lack of technical skills and expertise for
    implementation of new technologies
  • PA focuses on Defining public objectives,
    monitoring, regulating and, where necessary,
    financing those services

26
Public-Private Partnership (2)
  • PPP sharing of risks and benefits between PA
    private undertaking
  • A regulatory framework is needed (transparency
    and fair competition for the benefit of the
    taxpayer)
  • Do not sell just the old business under a new hat
    -)

27
WAI criteria
  • Priority 1 A Web content developer must satisfy
    this checkpoint. Otherwise, one or more groups
    will find it impossible to access information in
    the document. Satisfying this checkpoint is a
    basic requirement for some groups to be able to
    use Web documents.
  • Priority 2 A Web content developer should
    satisfy this checkpoint. Otherwise, one or more
    groups will find it difficult to access
    information in the document. Satisfying this
    checkpoint will remove significant barriers to
    accessing Web documents.
  • Priority 3 A Web content developer may address
    this checkpoint. Otherwise, one or more groups
    will find it somewhat difficult to access
    information in the document. Satisfying this
    checkpoint will improve access to Web documents.

28
10 rád pre vytváranie dostupných WWW stránok
  • Obrázky a animácie. Pouívajte atribút alt na
    popis kadého grafického objektu.
  • Klikatelné mapy. Pouívajte element MAP a text
    pre aktívne oblasti.
  • Multimédiá. Pouívajte titulky, prepis zvukových
    informácií a opis videa.
  • Hypertextové prepojenia. Pouívajte text, ktorý
    je zmysluplný aj vtedy, ked je vytrhnutý z
    kontexu. Vyhýbajte sa textu ako napr. "Kliknite
    tu".
  • truktúra stránky. Pouívajte nadpisy, zoznamy a
    jednotnú truktúru dokumentov. Tam kde je to
    moné, pouívajte CSS na umiestnovanie a
    formátovanie.
  • Source http//www.w3.org/WAI/References/QuickTips
    /qt.sk.htm

29
10 rád pre vytváranie dostupných WWW stránok (2)
  • Grafy a diagramy. Pridajte strucný obsah alebo
    pouite atribút longdesc.
  • Grafy a diagramy. Pridajte strucný obsah alebo
    pouite atribút longdesc.
  • Skripty, aplety a plug-iny. Poskytnite
    alternatívny obsah v prípade ak aktívne prvky nie
    sú dostupné alebo podporované.
  • Rámce. Pouívajte element noframes a zmysluplné
    názvy rámcov.
  • Tabulky. Zabezpecte zmysluplné cítanie riadok po
    riadku. Pridajte strucný obsah.
  • Kontrolujte svoju prácu. Vyhodnocujte. Pouívajte
    nástroje, kontrolné formuláre a intrukcie na
    http//www.w3.org/TR/WCAG.
  • Source http//www.w3.org/WAI/References/QuickTips
    /qt.sk.htm

30
A eGov/eDem solution WEBOCRAT (2)
  • 2) Methodological framework guidance for
    project managers, information architects when
    employing WEBOCRAT-like system
  • 3) Guides
  • Managers Guidelines - online learning
    environment
  • Citizens Guide
  • Employees Guide LG Task Administrator's guide
  • Installation Manual
  • Operations Guide System administrators manual
  • Knowledge Model Developers Guide how to build
    a KM

31
Webocracy Project - Lessons learned
  • User-driven approach needed (But At early stage
    of eGov development users do not know exactly
    what they can get raising awareness needed)
  • Committed Mayor Vision needed
  • Promotion towards specific user groups -
    citizens, local businesses, LG employees, local
    councillors,
  • New e-Gov/e-Dem system ? not necessarily (in
    introductory phase) less work for LA employees
  • Training, system of incentives for LA employees
  • Intuitive, simple user interface (users are not
    interested in the technology which is behind)
  • ... It is a long process

32
Webo - Results of the evaluation survey (SK)
  • December 2003, 425 respondents (LA employees,
    citizens, local businesses, local councillors)
  • Content, Up-to-date information, Navigation (OK
    60-80)
  • Most useful services (all user groups)
  • Publishing information on LA and its services
    (65)
  • Online submissions (citizens - 45, businesses
    60)
  • Public discussions (32)
  • Pollings (20)
  • Tenders (public procurement) (20)
  • Local businesses Download of forms
  • Local councillors results of voting, minutes of
    meetings etc.
  • Impact of new Web site (judged by LA employees)
  • Improved communication of LA with the public
    (28)
  • Better feedback from citizens / We know our
    citizens better (23)
  • Improved access of LA employees to information
    (20)
  • Improved e-skills of LA employees (18)

33
Webo - Results of the evaluation survey (2)
  • Identified barriers
  • Limited access to Internet (42)
  • Low interest in public issues (35)
  • Insufficient e-skills (30)
  • Efficiency of work at LA (judged by LA
    employees)
  • Increased (35)
  • No change (30)
  • Workload at LA (judged by LA employees)
  • Increased (50)
  • Would you object to (commercial) advertisement on
    LA web page? Yes 35 / No 65
  • 80 of local businesses are interested in company
    promotion on LA web site
  • Would you recommend LA web site? Yes 90

34
e-Gov market in EU
  • Year 2002 30 billion spent on the ICT part of
    PA (administrative services only, excluding
    health, education, defence etc.)
  • Of this an estimated 5 billion spent on eGov
    (growth 15 p.a.) without investment in
    re-organisation and training
  • Government revenues in EU15 45 of GDP
  • Employment in public services EU15 29, SK
    25.7
  • Labour productivity growth in public services
    EU15 0.9, SK 8.3 (annual growth, average
    for 1996-2002)
  • Economic benefits of eGov in Canadian province in
    terms of annual global savings 0.7 GDP
  • Source The role of eGov for future for Europes
    Future, COM(2003) Biatec 9/2004

35
To set up a company
  • SK 50 days
  • Turkey 9 days, Poland 5 days
  • Online registration Finland, Australia, France
    (8 days), , Moldavia, Vietnam

36
How to implement an eGov project?
  • Define a vision
  • Secure a strong political leadership and support
  • Identify user requirements (user-driven approach)
  • Identify a pilot application, define the
    objectives, identify relevant good practices,
    identify resources (SF, )
  • Implement the project (if possible adapt an
    existing solution)
  • Measure progress/impact (cost-benefit analysis,
    return on investment, customer satisfaction,
    benchmarking etc.)

37
eGov Roadmap
  • Why are we pursuing e-Gov?
  • eGov is about transformation technology is a
    tool
  • Do we have a clear vision and priorities
  • What kind of e-government are we ready for?
  • Infrastructure, ICT usage, budgetary resources
    etc
  • Is there enough political will to lead the
    e-government effort?
  • Expect opposition, motivate leaders,
  • Are we selecting e-government projects in the
    best way?
  • Do a diagnosis, shop around, match the project to
    the vision, see e-Gov from user's perspective

38
eGov Roadmap (2)
  • 6. How should we plan and manage e-government
    projects?
  • Establishing e-government teams, its authority, a
    work plan (content, competency, connectivity,
    continuing involvement of key stakeholders,
    capacity building)
  • How will we overcome resistance from within the
    government?
  • Understand their fear, Seek "buy-in, Explain,
    Train, Evaluate, Force, Reward, Praise
  • How will we measure and communicate progress?
    How will we know if we are failing?
  • Set overall performance criteria, Set benchmarks,
    Plan and publicize "quick wins" for e-Gov

39
eGov Roadmap (3)
  • Relationship with the private sector?
  • Private sector as a partner, Everyone needs
    "return on investment, Create realistic business
    models, Find each partner's strengths, Develop
    formal policies on outsourcing
  • How can e-government improve citizen
    participation in public affairs?
  • Learn as you go, Citizens are the e-Gov experts,
    e-Gov is evaluated through public participation

40
eGov Index
  • UN study of the Division for Public Economics and
    PA (UNDPEPA), year 2001, 190 M States
  • Benchmarking the core areas endemic to national
    e-Gov programs
  • Incorporates a countrys online presence,
    evaluates its telecommunications infrastructure,
    assesses its human development capacity
  • High eGov capacity - USA 3.11 Australia 2.60
    CR 2.09 Estonia 2.05
  • Medium eGov Capacity - Poland 1.96 Latvia
    1.88, Hungary 1.79 SR 1.71 Slovenia 1.66
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com