Meeting the BRAC Challenge In Army Planning - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Meeting the BRAC Challenge In Army Planning

Description:

Provide overview of Army programatic Planning support efforts. ... Hot seating units in swing space due to deployments. Need MILCON to happen before peace. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:120
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: Comp721
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Meeting the BRAC Challenge In Army Planning


1
Meeting the BRAC Challenge In Army Planning
Federal Planning Division APA 19 April 2006
Jerry.C.Zekert, CEMP-DA, (202) 761-7525, email
Jerry.C.Zekert _at_ hq02.usace.army.mil
2
Purpose of Presentation
  • Provide an overview of current BRAC Re-stationing
    effort facing the Army
  • Provide overview of Army programatic Planning
    support efforts.
  • Installation approach to supporting BRAC
  • Take A ways

3
Army Transforming Over Time
WARFIGHTING ARMY IN THE WAR TO END ALL WARS
FRONTIER ARMY
WARFIGHTING ARMY WW II Korea
COLD WAR ARMY
HEMISPHERIC DEFENSE (ISOLATIONISM)
CONSTABULARY MISSION
ARMY OF EXPANSION
?
4
Interim Facilities for ACIP Stationing
Fort Lewis
Fort Lewis
FY04/05/06 25,500 new soldiers stationed.
Ft Drum
Ft Riley CAB
Ft Riley UEx/SUA
Ft Lee
Ft Carson
Ft Eustis
Ft Knox
Ft Bragg
Ft Irwin
Ft Campbell
LEGEND
Ft Sill
Interim facilities in place. Awaiting MILCON
replacement.
Ft Benning
HAAF
PACIFIC
Ft Bliss
Funding for interim facilities expected 06.
Ft Stewart
Ft Polk
Ft Hood
Fort Wainwright
Interim solution not yet finalized stationing
decisions not final.
Hot seating units in swing space due to
deployments. Need MILCON to happen before peace.
Fort Richardson
Tokyo/Yokohama Akizuki/Kure Zama/Sagamihara
Okinawa
Over 1.3BM invested and 4,000 relocatable
buildings acquired
Betting on MILCON placement to beat stationings
Schofield Barracks
5
Echelons Above Brigades et al Impactsi.e. Costs
of Force Structure changes and stationing
occurring FY06-08
Fort Lewis - 72M
Ft Drum - 80M
FY06 FY08 23,500 more new soldiers
Ft Riley - 32M
Ft Carson 25M
Ft Leavenworth - 3.5M
Ft Leonard Wood - 42M
Ft Knox - 50M
Ft Bragg - 30M
Ft Irwin - 1.6M
Ft Campbell - 7M
Ft Sill - 10M
Hunter Army Airfield - 20M
Ft Benning - 24.5M
PACIFIC
Ft Stewart - 10M
LEGEND
Ft Bliss - 38M
Ft Polk - 7M
Fully funded executing
Fort Wainwright - 30.5M
Ft Hood - 5M
Full funding expected 1st Quarter 06.
Ft Sam Houston - 25.1M
Fort Richardson - 28M
Notes
Full funding expected by 2nd Quarter 06
Tokyo/Yokohama Akizuki/Kure Zama/Sagamihara
Okinawa
Funding expected by end FY06
Rough cost 700M
Scope/cost being developed
Schofield Barracks - 93M
6
MILCON requirements for Operational Army(Modular
Bdes MFAB)
Fort Lewis - 2,332
Ft Drum - 1,015M
65,500 new soldiers by end 2011
Ft Riley Total - 1,026M
Ft Lee - 607M
Ft Carson 1,042M
Ft Leonard Wood 281M
Ft Irwin - TBD
Ft Leavenworth 39M
Ft Knox - 270M
Ft Bragg - 437M
Ft Campbell - 700M
Ft Sill - 55M
Ft Benning - 41M
PACIFIC
Ft Bliss - 1,696M
Ft Stewart/HAAF - 512M
Ft Polk - 7M
Fort Wainwright - 548M
Ft Hood - 205M
MCA estimate 10,261M
Fort Richardson - 547M
Tokyo/Yokohama Akizuki/Kure Zama/Sagamihara
Okinawa
Requirements are based on detailed, boots on the
ground assessment. 7.2M invested in Requirement
Analysis and Planning Charrettes
contracts. Updated 15 March 06. DGL
Schofield Barracks - 1,778M
7
BRAC the Institutional Army Net Gain / Loss by
Installation
West Point 120M/264pn
59,800 new people
Picatinny 47.7M/693pn
Detroit Arsenal 107M/647pn
Aberdeen 877M/2176pn
Rock Island -1263pn
Ft Meade 102M/5361pn
Ft Belvoir 2189M/11,858pn
Ft Leavenworth 129M/203pn
Ft Eustis 137M/98pn
Ft Knox 500M/-944pn
Ft Lee 1,424M/7344pn
Ft Leonard Wood 123M/-87pn
Ft Campbell -351pn
Ft Bragg / Pope AFB 249M/4325pn
Ft Jackson 66M/615pn
Ft Sill 543M/3602pn
Redstone 90M/1655pn
Ft Benning 1,203M/9839pn
PACIFIC
LEGEND
Ft Sam Houston 1,709M/9364pn
Office/Light Industrial
Academic
4,841.9M TABS Estimate 12M Actual cost to
execute
Net loss
Tokyo/Yokohama Akizuki/Kure Zama/Sagamihara
Okinawa
Net gain 1 to 1000
Net gain 1001 to 5,000
Net gain greater than 5,000
8
Net Change of AMF, IGPBS, BRAC
142,000 people restationing
Ft Lewis 9,038
Fort Drum 4,142
West Point 264
Picatinny 693
Detroit Arsenal - 647
Aberdeen 2,176
Rock Island -1,263
Ft Meade 5,361
Ft Belvoir 11,858
Ft Riley 9,300
Ft Eustis 1,168
Ft Leavenworth 203
Ft Carson 9,638
Ft Knox 1,541
Ft Leonard Wood 1,665
Ft Lee 8,375
Ft Bragg / Pope AFB 8,291
Ft Campbell 4,619
Ft Irwin 1,292
Ft Sill 3,334
Ft Jackson 615
Redstone 1,655
Hunter Army Airfield 2,041
Ft Huachuca -336
Ft Benning 10,156
PACIFIC
Ft Hood 6,315
Ft Stewart 1,921
Ft Bliss 18,602
Ft Rucker 1,888
Ft Polk 1,006
Ft Wainwright 2,001
Ft Sam Houston 9399
LEGEND
Ft Richardson 3,652
Net loss
Tokyo/Yokohama Akizuki/Kure Zama/Sagamihara
Okinawa
Net gain 1 to 1000
Net gain 1001 to 5,000
Net gain greater than 5,000
Schofield Bks 3,098
9
BRAC Closures
14 Installations, 9k buildings, 48.8 MSF, 256k
Acres
Umatilla Chemical Depot
USAG Selfridge
Fort Monmouth
Newport Chemical Depot
Deseret Chemical Depot
Fort Monroe
Riverbank AAP
Kansas AAP
Fort McPherson
Fort Gillem
PACIFIC
Mississippi AAP
Lone Star AAP
Legend
HEAVY INDUSTRIAL
Tokyo/Yokohama Akizuki/Kure Zama/Sagamihara
Okinawa
LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
10
BRAC/AMF/IGPBS Charettes
  • Mandated to solve immediate planning/programming
    requirements
  • Focused on immediate/short-term needs, but
    urgently affects
  • long-term development
  • BRAC/AMC/IGPBS Charettes accomplish the following
    activities
  • Force Structure Review
  • Requirements Analysis Validation
  • Site Investigations / Land Use
  • Site Layout and Planning
  • Preparation of DD Form 1391s

11
BRAC/AMF/IGPBS Charettes
BRAC/AMF/IGPBS Charettes take about 1 month to
complete ACSIM/IMA has directed Centralized
Management of Charette Effort. USACE
Installation Support Center- Huntsville leads
this Effort with support from geographic
Districts Current ACSIM focus (BRAC05
initiatives) Service Schools (ARMOR/ORDNANCE/ADA
/TRANS) Select units (HRC/HQ FORSCOM/HQ
USARC) Echelons Above Brigade (EAB) Fort Knox is
now Priority 1
12
Army Real Property Master Planning
Planning Charettes focused ONLY in short term
needs
13
Army Real Property Master Planning
14
Lessons Learned Planning comprehensiveness
Presenting the process To Base Leaders to Solve
Todays and tomorrows legacy Gets Commands
buy-in Helps manage Change
Planning Principles Vision Goals Planning Conside
rations
Planning Goals Sustainability Critical
Infrastructure Protection Effective Land
Use Flexible Development- Changing
Missions ..planning principles
15
QA
16
Points of Contact
Jerry Zekert HQ, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers CEMP-DA 441 G St NE Washington DC (202)
761-7525 Jerry.C.Zekert_at_USACE.ARMY.MIL
Sean Ebersold Ecology and the Environment,
Inc. 1665 Palm Beach Lakes Road Suite 500 West
Palm Beach FL 561-640-6552 sebersold_at_ene.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com