Title: Human Ecology, the Common Good and other nice ideas''
1Human Ecology, the Common Good and other nice
ideas..
- The impact of recent Roman Catholic Ethics on
Public Health Practice
Jim McManus Asst Director of Public Health,
Barking Dagenham PCT Healthcare Reference
Group, Catholic Bishops Conference of England
Wales
Public Health Ethics Conference, 2007
May 2007
2Carbon Footprints!
- To reduce our carbon footprint we have not
provided paper copies of this presentation today - Please feel free to email me for an electronic
copy - jim.mcmanus_at_bdpct.nhs.uk
3 Summary
- Context of religious ethics in public policy
- Historical impact of Catholic Ethics
- Clinical Bioethics
- Public Health (Social) Ethics
- Recent conceptual developments in Catholic ethics
- Impact of these on public health
- -Impact on Catholic Lead systems
- Impact on state and other systems
- Draw some conclusions
4 Context of religious ethics in Public Policy
- Arguable landscape of influence and controversy
- We dont do God
- Separation of Church and State.honest
- Catholics and same sex adoption
- New Labour and Faith Groups
- Faith Fund
- Faiths in Major Incidents
- Faith Schools
- Care not Killing Alliance
5Historical Development of Bio-Ethics
- Catholic Moral Theology shaped many important
principles in Bio-ethics - Double Effect
- Beneficence (justice) versus Privacy
(personalism) - Fundamental Option
- Well documented
- Recent trends resource allocation
- But this view of development obscures the public
health ethics influences
6Parallel Tracks in Biomedical and Social Ethics
easy to ignore the PH elements
- Moral Theology/Bioethics Casuistry of Medicine
- Medicina Pastoralis in usum Confessariorum
- Giuseppe Antonelli, 1891
- Allocution on Relief of Pain
- Pius XII
- Humanae Vitae
- Ashley and ORourke
- Social Teaching Inequalities and Environment
- Rerum Novarum (Leo XIII)
- Mit Brennender Sorge (Pius XI)
- Gaudium et Spes (Vat II)
- Pacem in Terris (John XXIII)
- Octagesima Adveniens (Paul VI)
- Centessimus Annus (JP II)
- Social Teaching Compendium
7Recent Developments in RC Ethics
- The Fundamental Option (Optio Fundamentalis)
- The Common Good
- Resource allocation seen in light of the Common
Good - Duties of the State
- Ambivalence towards the Welfare State
- Human Ecology
- Arose from the application of the Common Good
- An Ockhams Razor for assessing the
anthropological impact of social and public
policy - Duty of Charity or Co-operation in moral evil?
- Healthcare professionals
- HIV Prevention
8Recent Developments Vibrancy and Relevance?
- Noonan moral doctrine developing and ethics
developing from this influence systems of
healthcare - Cahill influencing healthcare systems and
systems of public policy making around Quality of
Life and resource allocation - The new challenge of explicitly theological
reasoning in the public square - Development of social teaching to broader
concerns including globalisation, while retaining
anthropological concern - Continued development of health challenges
- Continued development of moral tradition
9The Common Good (GS, 26)
- The sum total of social conditions which allow
people, either as groups or as individuals, to
reach their fulfilllment more fully and more
easily - Three elements
- Respect for the person as such public
authorities bound to respect inalienable rights - Social well-being and development of population
Development is the epitome of all social duties
(CCC,1907) - The proper function of authority to arbitrate,
in the name of the common good, between various
particular interests but it should make
accessible to each what is needed to lead a truly
human life food, clothing, health, work - Peace stability and security of a just order
10Human Ecology as a Principle for Public Health
Ethics (Centesimus Annus)
- In addition to the irrational destruction of the
natural environment, we must also mention the
more serious destruction of the human
environmenttoo little effort is made to
safeguard the moral conditions for an authentic
human ecology..in this context, mention should
be made of the serious problems of modern
urbanization, of the need for urban planning
which is concerned with how people are to live,
and of the attention which should be given to a
social ecology of work (next slide discusses
these principles and application in PH work)
11Inequalities in Anthroplogical Perspective
- with respect to the fundamental rights of the
person, every type of discrimination, whether
social or cultural, whether based on sex, race,
colour, social condition, language or religion,
is to be overcome and eradicated as contrary to
Gods intent - Gaudium et Spes
- It is essential for every human being to have a
sense of participating, of being a part of the
decisions and endeavours that shape the destiny
of the world. - World Day of Peace Message 1985
- It is a strict duty of justice and truth not to
allow fundamental human needs to remain
unsatisfied, and not allow those burdened by such
needs to perish. It is also necessary to help
these people to acquire expertise, to enter the
circle of exchange, and to develop their skills
in order to make the best use of their capacities
and resources - Centesimus Annus
12The Fundamental Option
- Post Vatican II Moral Theology
- Rediscovering of Patristic and Scholastic
perspectives - A fundamental option is either made or not made
by the person, the difficulty is enacting this - Evaluate morally or ethically against a pattern,
course for lifecourse, if this helps not just
against a recent action - Analogies with health behaviour change theory are
obvious
13Problems in Deliberate or Reckless HIV
Transmission
- Application of Different Ethical Standards
- The Murderous HIV Infected Person
- The Reckless HIV Infected Person
- The Virtuous HIV Infected Person
- Slippery Slope Arguments
- Against disclosure
- For disclosure
- Abstract Reasoning or Negotiation?
- Inventing Moral Identities of Issue
Is there an ethical issue here about fear of HIV
and people with it? What do we as psychologists
have to day on the effects of this? Thomas
Aquinas and von Balthasar on fear
14Some immediate uses.
- Conflict of Principles
- Privacy
- Beneficence
- Vulnerability Human Ecology against the
interests of the fittest - Slippery Slope or Step Arguments
- Does consent (implied or actual) or recklessness
as go self-care from the person to be infected
make a moral difference? - Useful in arguing against slippery slope concepts
15Sources and Norms hitherto
- Psychological Ethics
- strong deontological feel to it in many cases
- deriving from professional sense of duty and
evidence - Heavily predisposed towards privacy
- Medical Ethics has a much stronger involvement
of law - Disclosure guidelines in law
- Heavily predisposed towards decision making
process by doctor - Strong defence
16Five Principles
- Respect for Patient Autonomy
- Beneficence promoting what is best for the
patient - Non Maleficence avoid harm
- Justice
- The Person with HIV is not the only moral agent
Lest you think this is all gas, all of these
principles have surfaced in one way or another in
all the legal cases so far
17Moral Agency and the Fundamental Option in
Reckless HIV Transmission
- Moral Agency of Infected Person
- Moral Agency of Partners
- Knowing and Consenting
- Implicit Consent
- Recklessness
- Non Consenting
- Moral Agency of the Psychologist
- Moral Agency of the Medics
- Dumping on the Psychologists
18Problematic of historical approach
- The Five Principles (Autonomy,Beneficence,Privacy,
Non-Maleficience, Justice,) point to an ethic of
prudence which does NOT take responsibility for
the person - Falling Foul of the Criminal Law on Disclosure
- Falling Foul of Civil Law
- Adopting the Medical Model for doing things
19Hierarchy of Principles in Reckless or Deliberate
HIV Transmission
Arguably the Model Preferred by Law
Should it depend on the situation which comes
highest? Can Moral Agency be more salient than
Beneficence at times? Is a hierarchial model
workable?
Which comes highest?
Agency of Infected
Beneficence
Non Maleficence
Moral Agency of Infectee
Autonomy/Privacy
20Dynamic Tension Model and use of the Fundamental
Option
Beneficence
A possible option for Reform of Infectious
Diseases Law?
Moral Agency Optio Fundamentalis
Autonomy
Justice
21What are the key duties
- Within the bounds of the law
- Duty to weigh up beneficence against privacy
- Harm
- Within professional duties
- Duty to client wellbeing (trust and confidence,
outcomes) - Duty to safeguard others (beneficience)
- Duty to safeguard self (professional self regard)
22Acting Probably
- Acting Probably is a means of protecting you
and patient against unintended consequences - Risks if you do not acr probably
- Prosecution by police for not disclosing
- Civil suit by victims for not disclosing
- Civil suit by client for disclosing
- Professional standards disciplinary procedures
- Public Health Consequences
- Demonstrate you act in accordance with a body of
sound professional opinion which has taken the
law into account - Document and evidence this
- Ensure you have taken reasonable steps to inform
yourself of what the body of opinion is saying
and continues to say - Consult superiors and supervisor
- Take legal advice
- Act Consistently
23Acting Prudently
- The Law is a source and a norm for your conduct
whether you like it or not - The Optio Fundamentalis helps preserve autonomy
while evaluating actions in consonance with other
principles - Avoid Consequentialism in Ethics on this issue
24When to Disclose?
- Intransigence/Refusal to Disclose
- Proximate Harm to Others
- Deliberate Intent
- Recklessness
- Indifference?
- Distal Harm to others?
25When Not to Disclose?
- Accident?
- Recklessness, or clearly implied consent by other
parties - Bug-chasers
- Optio Fundamentalis
- There is a real desire to do what is best, but
this has to be negotiated round some very
difficult circumstances
26Implied Ethical Duties before disclosure
- Autonomy - Give the person due notice and a
chance - Non-Maleficence - Advise them to seek legal
advice - Beneficence What could happen if you disclose
too readily?
27Harm Reduction as an exercise in Charity
- The Body and its place in anthropological
perspective - Legal tradtion
- Theological traditions
- Health traditions
- These all have some common wisdoms about the
body - Injecting drug use and other behaviours which
harm health have been seen as hostile to the duty
to treat the body with dignity - Some have suggested a harm reduction approach is
formal co-operation in moral evil - Recent use of Optio Fundamentalis, Human Ecology,
and re-interpretation of the principle of Charity
has lead to a number of different conclusions
28Harm Reduction as an exercise in Charity
- Australia
- Order of religious sisters providing harm
reduction services including addiction
counselling - Decided to provide shooting galleries
- Theological rationale provided in The Furrow
- Balancing Act of Co-operation in Moral Evil vs
the demands of Charity - This principle has been further developed in HIV
and AIDs casuistry to support policies of harm
reduction (safer sex) in HIV at population and
individual level - This approach has influenced ethical discussions
of HIV prevention and some work on barebacking
culture
29Whats the Impact of all this? (Good? ill?)
- Catholic Church Funded Systems
- 25 of AIDS care globally
- Largest single hospital provider in developing
world - D
- Catholics active in healthcare in other settings
- Italian Cardiology system
- Amercian option for the poor systems
- Policy Network Approaches in UK
- HIV Criminalisation
- Resource Allocation
- End of Life Care
30Environment and Health Promotion
- Rome Symposium 2005
- Environmental Ecology and Human Ecology
principles meet - Environment seen as essential for human
flourishing - Back to the whole system approach of The Common
Good - Direct impact on environmental and health
activism within Catholic Church agencies
31Human Ecology and the Policy Process
- Policies and processes which take a holistic view
of the human conditions for development - Informed objections to industrial development
which harms health - Lobbying for an ecological approach to health as
a key consideration within development of public
health policy - The German Bishops statements on the Common Good
and Social Welfare, and their statement on Health
Systems - The Australian and New Zealand church approach to
planning for a pandemic
32Human Ecology and Resource Allocation
- Policies assessed against these principles
- Quality of Life debates currently being looked at
- Linking into virtue ethics
- In turn into positive psychology
33 Conclusions
- The project of Public Theology is here for some
time - PH Ethics has to find a way of incorporating
religious ethical discourse - it is not exempt from same challenges others
have - Religious ethics needs to find a way of engaging
in the public square - Recent Catholic PH ethics show promise in
this regard - Public Health is an obvious place of
engagement/battlefield - Rules of Engagement
- Risks -
- Benefits equity? Cohesion? Quality of decisions?
34Contact Details
- Jim McManus
- Asst Director of Public Health
- Barking Dagenham PCT
- The Clock House
- East Street
- Barking IG11 8EY
- www.CatholicsinHealthcare.org.uk
-
- jim.mcmanus_at_bdpct.nhs.uk