Re-Entry and Recidivism - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Re-Entry and Recidivism

Description:

Drug Offenders Increasing Percentage of Prison Releases ... Examines recidivism patterns during 3 years post release ... RENPS: Returned to prison with a new sentence ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:212
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: libbyde
Category:
Tags: entry | recidivism

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Re-Entry and Recidivism


1
Re-Entry and Recidivism
  • Libby Deschenes, Ph.D.
  • Cal State University, Long Beach
  • Barbara Owen, Ph.D. and
  • Jason CrowCal State University, Fresno

2
Increasing Burden on CJS
                                              
Source Bureau of Justice Statistics Correctional
Surveys
3
Drug Offenders Increasing Percentage of Prison
Releases
                                 
Source http//www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/reentry/relea
ses.htm
4
Increases in Recidivism
Source http//www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/reentry/recid
ivism.htmrecidivism
5
Challenges of Re-entry
  • Serious social and medical problems
  • 75 history drug/alcohol abuse
  • 16 report a mental condition
  • Less than one-third received treatment
  • Few have marketable skills or sufficient literacy
    to become gainfully employed
  • 33 unemployed at arrest
  • 60 have GED or HS diploma
  • 25 in vocational training programs
  • 33 participated education programs

Source J. Petersilia (2005) Hard Time
Ex-Offenders Returning Home after Prison
6
Current Research
  • Study funded by NIJ using archived data
  • Examines recidivism patterns during 3 years post
    release
  • Evaluates measures of offense specialization
  • How do incarceration and recidivism of males and
    females differ?
  • What factors will be important for prisoner
    re-entry?

7
Research Design
  • Secondary data
  • Collected by Bureau of Justice Statistics
  • Three year follow-up of inmates released in 1994
  • Discharged from 15 states
  • Weighted data for all analyses
  • 248,528 males
  • 23,585 females

8
Data Sources for Recidivism Measures
  • Official FBI and state criminal histories
  • Rearrest
  • Reconviction
  • Resentenced to prison
  • Official criminal history and state DOC
  • Return to prison with or without new sentence

9
Results
  • Sample characteristics by gender
  • Demographics
  • Criminal history
  • Recidivism
  • Patterns of male and female offending

10
Comparing Demographicsby Gender
  • Females represent 8.7 of total sample
  • Black women (50.5) more represented than White
    women (48.5), in direct contrast with males
    (Black, 48.3 White, 50.6)
  • Hispanic women underrepresented in comparison to
    males (19.6 versus 25)
  • Women released later in life than men

11
Type of Incarceration Offense
12
Comparing Sentencesby Gender
  • Higher proportion of women (79) incarcerated for
    property or drug offense than men (65)
  • Women sentences shorter than malesby 10.3
    months, averaging 49.6 months
  • Women served a mean time of 14.2 months, 6.7
    months less than the men
  • Women served 30.2 of original sentence, men
    served 35.7 of original sentence

13
Comparing Criminal Historyby Gender
  • Similar prior arrest rates (92.8 and 93.2,
    respectively)
  • Males more likely to have at least one prior
    conviction (96.9 to 89.1)
  • Women less likely to have a prior prison sentence
    (37.3 vs. 44.2)

14
Recidivism for Male and Female Prisoners
REARR Rearrested (recidivated) RECON
Reconvicted RENPS Returned to prison with a new
sentence RPWOW Returned to prison with or
without a new sentence
15
Violent Offense Category by Recidivism Status by
Gender
REARR Rearrested (recidivated) RECON
Reconvicted RENPS Returned to prison with a new
sentence RPWOW Returned to prison with or
without a new sentence
16
Property Offense Category by Recidivism Status by
Gender
REARR Rearrested (recidivated) RECON
Reconvicted RENPS Returned to prison with a new
sentence RPWOW Returned to prison with or
without a new sentence
17
Drug Offense Category by Recidivism Status by
Gender
REARR Rearrested (recidivated) RECON
Reconvicted RENPS Returned to prison with a new
sentence RPWOW Returned to prison with or
without a new sentence
18
Public-order Offense Category by Recidivism
Status by Gender
REARR Rearrested (recidivated) RECON
Reconvicted RENPS Returned to prison with a new
sentence RPWOW Returned to prison with or
without a new sentence
19
Other Offense Category by Recidivism Status by
Gender
REARR Rearrested (recidivated) RECON
Reconvicted RENPS Returned to prison with a new
sentence RPWOW Returned to prison with or
without a new sentence
20
Rearrest Rates of Female and All Prisoners by
Time after Release
21
Reconviction of Female and All Prisoners by Time
after Release
22
Return to Prison of Female and All Prisoners by
Time after Release
23
Time to Rearrest for Females
Variables in the Equation black
273.3hispanic 22.6sentence 144.6age
rlse 647.1 priors 2259.9time serve
36.0violent first 41.8 drug first 63.1
24
Type of Rearrest for Females
25
Criminal Career Patternsfor Females
26
Career Offense Typesfor Females
27
Preliminary Findings on Female Recidivism and
Specialization
  • Three strongest predictors
  • Number of prior arrests
  • Age at release
  • African-American race
  • Drug and property offenders more likely than
    violent offenders to be re-arrested
  • High proportion of career offenses same type
  • Over half of property offenders repeat
  • About one third for violent or drug offenses

28
Policy Implications
  • Male violent offenders pose greatest risk
  • Need for community reinvestment initiativesto
    reverse socioeconomic risk factors
  • Female property and drug offenders highest rates
    of recidivism
  • Community-based treatment may be more appropriate
    than prison
  • Re-entry should focus on drug treatment, stable
    housing, wraparound services

29
California Prisons versus Other States
Source Fischer (2005) UCI Center for Evidence
Based Corrections Bulletin 1(1)
30
California Recidivism Has Different Policy
Implications
  • Fischers analysis controls for background
  • Rearrest not higher in CA compared to FL
  • Reconviction lower in CA compared to NY
  • High rates of technical violations partially
    explained by fact that nearly all CA prisoners
    report to parole agents
  • Petersilia (2005) recommends reinstating
    discretionary parole
  • Austin, Hardyman Irwin (2002) suggest reducing
    time on parole to 6 months and require parole
    board guidelines based on risk and need
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com