Title: Writing Across Communities Literacy and Diversity at UNM
1 Writing Across Communities Literacy and
Diversity at UNM
- Civic/Community Literacies Knowing Our Students
(Spring 2005) - Academic Literacies Inviting Our Students (Fall
2005) - Professional Literacies Serving Our Students
(Spring 2006)
2 Renewing Our Commitment to
Addressing the Needs of Local
Communities
- CASA Latina (1994-1996)
- Teachers for a New Era
- Washington Center for Teaching and Learning
- (Co-Director, 2004-Present)
- Successful Schools in Action (2004-Present)
- Campaña Quetzal (2004-Present)
3 Compaña Quetzal Latino Education
Summit Resolutions
- On Community Empowerment and Participation
- On Parent Leadership and Involvement
- On Early Childhood Education
- On the Cultural, Linguistic, and Academic Needs
of the Latino Community
4Latino Education Summit Resolutions, continued
- On Disproportionality in Discipline
- On College Support
- On Recruitment of Latino Instructional Staff
- On Proyecto Saber
- On State and Federal Obligations
5Creating Pathways to Academic Literacy and Beyond
- Situating the Personal, Professional, and
Political - Juan C. Guerra
- Department of English
- University of Washington at Seattle
6 Expanded WAC/WID programs at most universities
typically consist of four components
- First-year writing (introduction to academic
discourse, topic seminars) - Student support (writing center, course-based
tutoring) - Upper-level courses (writing in the disciplines)
- Faculty development (seminars, consultations,
course approval) - (adapted from Parks
Goldblatt, 2000)
7 Most universities could create a writing
across communities program by adding the
following components
- Service and experiential learning
- K-16 connections
- Community literacy projects
- Literacy research
- Technology leadership
- Business and professional outreach
- (adapted from Parks
Goldblatt, 2000)
8 Philosophical Principles
Informing the Work
of Transforming Cultures of Writing
Across Communities First
Principle We must work to dismantle the
barriers that separate the university from
local communities. From the standpoint of
the child, the great waste in the school comes
from his or her inability to utilize the
experiences he or she gets outside of the
school in any complete and free way within the
school itself while, on the other hand, he
or she is unable to apply in daily life what he
is learning at school. John
Dewey Dewey in Education, 1899/1998
9 Second Principle Because it occupies a
position of power in the larger community and
possesses the necessary resources, the
university must work to address the literacy
needs of the multiple communities that it
serves. What Im describing might be
called the New American College, an institution
that celebrates teaching and selectively
supports research, while also taking special
pride in its capacity to connect thought to
action, theory to practice. This New
American College would organize
cross-disciplinary institutes around pressing
social issues. Undergraduates at the college
would participate in field projects,
relating ideas to real life. Classrooms and
laboratories would be extended to include
health clinics, youth centers, schools and
government offices. Faculty members would
build partnerships with practitioners who would,
in turn, come to campus as lecturers and
student advisors. The new American
College, as a connected institution, would be
committed to improving, in a very
intentional way, the human condition. Ernest
Boyer Creating the New American
College Chronicle of Higher Education, 1994
10 Third Principle Everyone involved in
the process of developing a writing across
communities program must engage in a shared and
mutually productive critique of public
education. A network of people concerned
with literacy in a region could develop a
supportive and constructive critique of public
education that would make solutions possible
across traditional educational and community
boundaries.
Steve Parks Eli Goldblatt
Writing Beyond the Curriculum
Fostering
New Collaboration in Literacy
College
English, 2000
11The Rhetorical Practice of Transcultural
Repositioning Transcultural
repositioning is a rhetorical ability that
members of disenfranchised communities often
enact intuitively but must learn to regulate
self-consciously, if they hope to move
productively across different languages,
registers, and dialects different social and
economic classes different cultural and artistic
forms and different ways of seeing, being
in, and thinking about the increasingly fluid
and hybridized world emerging all around us.
Juan Guerra Putting Literacy in its
Place Nomadic Consciousness and the
Practice Of Transcultural Repositioning
Rebellious Reading The Dynamics of
Chicana/o Cultural Literacy, 2004
12 The Roots of Transculturation
- When he first coined the concept of
transculturation in 1947 as an alternative to the
concepts of assimilation and acculturation,
Fernando Ortiz posited that the result of every
union of cultures is similar to that of the
reproductive process between individuals the
offspring always has something of both parents
but is always different from each of them. - In 1991, Mary Louise Pratt described
transcultuation as the processes whereby members
of subordinated or marginal groups select and
invent from materials transmitted by a dominant
or metropolitan culture. While subordinate
peoples do not usually control what emanates
from the dominant culture, they do determine to
varying extents what gets absorbed into their own
and what it gets used for. - Vivian Zamel argued in 1997 that transculturation
reflects precisely how languages and cultures
develop and change--infused, invigorated, and
challenged by variation and innovation.
13 The Roots of Repositioning
- According to Min-Zhan Lu (1990), each student
writer has access to a range of discourses--the
discourses used in college and in other cultural
sites, such as home, workplace, high school,
neighborhood, among religious, recreational,
peer, or gender groups. - Moreover, conventions and meanings intersect and
conflict both within and between these
discourses. - In negotiating their way through these
conflicting terrains, Lu contends that students
have three options they may 1) choose to
assimilate the academys ways of thinking and
writing 2) choose the path of biculturalism or
3) see writing as a process in which the writer
positions, or rather, repositions herself in
relation not to a single, monolithic discourse
but to a range of competing discourses.
14A better understanding of cultural diversity can
enhance our students ability
- To write appropriately . . .
- with an awareness of discourse
conventions - To write productively . . .
- by achieving their social and
material aims - To write ethically . . .
- by becoming attuned to the
cultural ecology around them - To write critically . . .
- by engaging in inquiry and
discovery - To write responsively . . .
- by responsibly negotiating the
tensions of exercising authority
15 The Personal
- Before we arrive at the university, each of us
learns how to communicate with others in the
context of a situated community whose members
share an identity and a set of linguistic and
cultural values. These are then reflected in - Our participation in local languages and dialects
- Our enactment of local literacy practices
- Our interactions with members of other discourse
communities
16 The Professional
- The university is one of the many sets of
discourse communities that we engage in the
course of our social and personal development.
There, we - Learn the language of the academy
- Are initiated into a discipline and prepare for a
- professional career
- Acknowledge the likelihood of multiple career
changes
17 The Political
- Besides preparing us for a career, a
university education also prepares us to engage
in the civic discourses - of our local, state, and national
communities. We initiate and carry out this
process by - Reconnecting with a local community
- Identifying its particular needs
- Addressing the communitys needs through a shared
theory of action