Title: LECTURE 7 Conformity
1LECTURE 7 Conformity
- Administration
- Chameleon Effect
- Sherifs Autokinetic Effect Study
- Asches Conformity Studies
- Milgrams Obedience Studies
- Zimbardos Stanford Prison Study
- Break
- Video on Conformity
- Resisting Conformity
- Next Class
2Questions?
3Conformity
- Definition A change in behaviour or beliefs due
to the real or imagined influence of other
people. - Social Norms the implicit or explicit rules a
group has for the acceptable behaviours, values,
and beliefs of its members
4Chameleon Effect
- Definition The nonconscious mimicry of the
postures, mannerisms, and facial expressions of
ones interaction partner - Theorize that the mere perception of anothers
behaviour can automatically increase the
likelihood of engaging in that behaviour oneself.
5(No Transcript)
6Chameleon Effect
- Chartrand and Bargh (1999)
7(No Transcript)
8Informational Social Influence
- Conforming because we believe that others
interpretation of an ambiguous situation is more
correct than ours and will help us choose an
appropriate course of action. - Acceptance Conformity that involves both acting
and believing in accord with social pressure. - We conform because we think this is the right
way to act in this situation.
9Autokinetic Study (Sherif, 1936)
10 11(No Transcript)
12 13(No Transcript)
14 15(No Transcript)
16 17(No Transcript)
18Autokinetic Study (Sherif, 1936)
19When do we conform to informational social
influence?
- When the situation is ambiguous
- Fire alarms
- When there is a crisis
- When others are experts
20Normative Social Influence
- Conforming in order to be liked and accepted or
to fulfil others expectations this type of
conformity results in public compliance (but not
necessarily private acceptance) of the groups
beliefs and behaviours - Public Compliance Conformity that involves
publicly acting in accord with social pressure
while privately disagreeing
21Social Pressure Study (Asch, 1951)
1
2
3
22Social Pressure Study (Asch, 1951)
23Compliance
- Definition a change in behaviour due to a direct
request from another person. - Obedience conformity in response to the commands
of an authority figure
24Milgrams (1963) Obedience Study
- Teachers believe they are delivering shocks to
a learner (appear to be randomly assigned to
the roles). - Every time the learner gets an answer wrong, he
gets a shock that increases in intensity. - Strongly encouraged by the experimenter to
continue, even when the learner protests.
25Milgrams Obedience Study
- Normative social influence It is absolutely
essential that you continue (I did commit to
doing this studywhat will he think of me if I
mess up his study now?) - Informational social influence
ambiguity/novelty of the situation when unsure,
we look to the expert (the experimenter)
26Milgrams (1963) Obedience Study
27Obedience Across Studies
Percentage fully obedient
Experimental Version
28Milgrams Obedience Study
- Explanations for why they obeyed
- In automatic pilot to the obey experimenter
norm - mindlessness - Fast-pace doesnt allow for much thought
- Increased in small increments (like
foot-in-the-door).
29Stanford Prison StudyZimbardo (1971)
- Personality versus Situation
- - Results of the Milgram Study
- - Goals of the Stanford Prison Study
- Whether the situation defined guards and
prisoners brutality and behaviours or whether it
was related to the personality of people who took
on those roles? - Role
- A set of norms that define how people in a given
social position ought to behave.
30Stanford Prison StudyZimbardo (1971)
- Zimbardo randomly assigned university students to
role-play being either guards or prisoners. - Guards were given uniforms, whistles, and clubs
and were told to enforce the rules. - Prisoners were given uniforms and locked in
cells. - Although this study was originally planned for 2
weeks after only 6 days they had to stop the
study because of the hostility of the prison
guards and the mental and physical deterioration
of the prisoners.
31Resisting Social Pressure
- Reactance (Brehm Brehm, 1981)
- An attempt to restore ones sense of freedom.
- Correction Theory (Wegener Petty, 1997)
- We correct for
- Direction of perceived influence
- Extent of perceived influence
- To Correct we need
- Motivation and Ability
32Training and Correction StudyKawakami, Dovidio,
van Kamp (2002)
- Male and Female Stereotypes
- Women
- Friendly
- Submissive
- Dependent
- Caring
- Men
- Dominant
- Independent
- Ambitious
- Competitive
33NEW ASSOCIATION TRAINING
PHOTO
TRAIT
FEMALE STEREO
FEMALE PHOTO
MALE STEREO
FEMALE STEREO
MALE PHOTO
MALE STEREO
34(No Transcript)
35(No Transcript)
36- General Procedure
- Nonstereotype Association Training
- Job Ad, CVs, and Cover Letters
- - 2 men and 2 women only identified by name
- Choose Best Candidate
37- Conditions
- Just Training Possible Correction Processes
- Nonstereotype Association Training
- Job Ad, CVs, and Cover Letters
- Choose Best Candidate
- Training Filler Task Reduce Motivation No
Correction - Nonstereotype Association Training
- 10 Minute Break
- Job Ad, CVs, and Cover Letters
- Choose Best Candidate
- Training Probe Task Reduce Ability No
Correction - Nonstereotype Association Training
- Job Ad , CVs, and Cover Letters Probe Reaction
Task - Choose Best Candidate Probe Reaction Task
38(No Transcript)
39(No Transcript)
40Percentage of Candidates Chosen
41Questions?
42Next Class
- Class 8 Monday, June 4th
- Altruism and Aggression
-
- Reading material
- Chapter 9 Altruism Helping Others
- pp. 277-314.
- Chapter 10 Aggression Hurting Others
- pp. 315-352.
- Lecture Slides for Class 7 and Class 8 will
be posted later today.