LECTURE 5 Conformity and Persuasion - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

LECTURE 5 Conformity and Persuasion

Description:

Mon June 27th Conformity (6) and Persuasion (7) ... Peripheral Route Persuasion: ... Resisting Persuasion ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:109
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: atkin2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: LECTURE 5 Conformity and Persuasion


1
LECTURE 5Conformity and Persuasion
  • June 27th, 2005
  • PSYC 2120 (A) 3.0 Social Psychology

When you think of the long and gloomy history of
man, you will find more hideous crimes have been
committed in the name of obedience than in the
name of rebellion. C.P. Snow
2
Syllabus change
  • Chapter 13 switched to next
    weeks Prejudice lecture
  • Next week will cover Prejudice and Intergroup
    Relations (Chapter 13) on Monday, Aggression and
    Altruism on Tuesday, and Attraction on Wednesday

3
New Schedule
  • This week
  • Mon June 27th Conformity (6) and Persuasion (7)
  • Tues June 28th Group Influence (8) and
    Stereotype threat
  • Wed June 29th Gender, Culture and Emotional
    Expression (5)
  • Thursday MIDTERM 2 (covers chapters 5-8 and
    this weeks lectures)
  • Next week
  • Mon July 4th Prejudice (12) AND Intergroup
    Relations (13)
  • Tues July 5th Aggression Prosocial Behaviour
    (10 9)
  • Wed July 6th Attraction and Intimacy (11)
  • Friday July 8th FINAL EXAM (Multiple choice
    covers chapters 9-13 short-answer questions are
    cumulative)

4
Road Map
  • Conformity
  • Informational Social Influence
  • Normative Social Influence
  • Obedience
  • Persuasion
  • Two routes (central peripheral)
  • Resisting persuasion

5
Conformity
  • Definition A change in behaviour or beliefs due
    to the real or imagined influence of other
    people.
  • Social Norms the implicit or explicit rules a
    group has for the acceptable behaviours, values,
    and beliefs of its members

6
Informational Social Influence
  • Conforming because we believe that others
    interpretation of an ambiguous situation is more
    correct than ours and will help us choose an
    appropriate course of action.
  • Acceptance Conformity that involves both acting
    and believing in accord with social pressure.

7
Autokinetic Study (Sherif, 1936)
8
Chameleon Effect
  • Definition The nonconscious mimicry of the
    postures, mannerisms, and facial expressions of
    ones interaction partner
  • Theorize that the mere perception of anothers
    behaviour can automatically increase the
    likelihood of engaging in that behaviour oneself.

9
Chemeleon Effect
  • Chartrand and Bargh (1999)

10
When do we conform to informational social
influence?
  • When the situation is ambiguous
  • Fire alarms
  • When there is a crisis
  • When others are experts

11
Normative Social Influence
  • Conforming in order to be liked and accepted or
    to fulfil others expectations this type of
    conformity results in public compliance (but not
    necessarily private acceptance) of the groups
    beliefs and behaviours
  • Public Compliance Conformity that involves
    publicly acting in accord with social pressure
    while privately disagreeing

12
Social Pressure Study (Asch, 1951)
1
2
3
13
Social Pressure Study (Asch, 1951)
14
When do we conform to normative social influence?
  • Social Impact Theory (Latane, 1981)
  • Strength (how important are the people to you?)
  • Immediacy (close in space and time)
  • Number (how many in the group)
  • Unanimous
  • Can also be influenced by
  • Culture (more in collectivist cultures)
  • Self-Esteem (low SE may fear rejection more)

15
Road Map
  • Conformity
  • Informational Social Influence
  • Normative Social Influence
  • Obedience
  • Persuasion
  • Two routes (central peripheral)
  • Resisting persuasion

16
Compliance
  • Definition a change in behaviour due to a direct
    request from another person.
  • Obedience conformity in response to the commands
    of an authority figure

17
Mindless Compliance
  • Obeying internalized social norms, without
    deliberating about ones actions
  • Secretary study This paper is to be returned
    immediately to Room 238 through interoffice mail

18
Door-in-the-face
  • Presented with a LARGE request (expected to
    refuse), followed by a smaller, more reasonable
    request (expected to accept)
  • Operates due to the reciprocity norm (if I do
    something nice for you, you should do something
    nice for me)
  • Not to be confused with foot-in-the-door (due to
    self-perception)

19
Milgrams (1963) Obedience Study
  • Teachers believe they are delivering shocks to
    a learner (randomly assigned to the roles).
  • Strongly encouraged by the experimenter to
    continue, even when the learner protests.

20
Milgrams Obedience Study
  • Normative social influence It is absolutely
    essential that you continue (I did commit to
    doing this studywhat will he think of me if I
    mess up his study now?)
  • Informational social influence
    ambiguity/novelty of the situation when unsure,
    we look to the expert (the experimenter)

21
Milgrams Obedience Study
  • Additional Factors
  • In automatic pilot to the obey experimenter
    norm
  • Fast-pace doesnt allow for much thought
  • Increased in small increments (like
    foot-in-the-door).

22
Resisting Social Pressure
  • Reactance an attempt to restore ones sense of
    freedom.

23
Definitions
  • Conformity A change in behaviour or beliefs due
    to the real or imagined influence of other
    people.
  • Informational Social Influence (Acceptance)
    Conforming because we believe that others
    interpretation of an ambiguous situation is more
    correct than ours.
  • Normative Social Influence (Public Conformity)
    Conforming in order to be liked and accepted or
    to fulfil others expectations this type of
    conformity results in public compliance (but not
    necessarily private acceptance) of the groups
    beliefs and behaviours
  • Compliance a change in behaviour due to a direct
    request from another person.
  • Mindless Compliance Obeying internalized social
    norms, without deliberating about ones actions
  • Obedience conformity in response to the commands
    of an authority figure
  • Reactance an attempt to restore ones sense of
    freedom.

24
Road Map
  • Conformity
  • Informational Social Influence
  • Normative Social Influence
  • Compliance and Obedience
  • Persuasion
  • Two routes (central peripheral)
  • Resisting persuasion

25
Persuasive Communication
  • A communication (e.g., a speech or television ad)
    advocating a particular side of an issue.
  • You should stop studying and come to the party
  • I think you should go grocery shopping instead
    of me
  • Commercial to buy a swiffer

26
Persuasion
  • Central Route Persuasion
  • A focus on the actual content of the arguments
    that stimulates thinking in favour of the new
    attitude (also known as systematic processing)
    Keys Ability and Motivation
  • Peripheral Route Persuasion
  • Acceptance is triggered by incidental cues (i.e.,
    attractiveness of the speaker) without much
    thinking (also known as heuristic-based
    processing)

27
Canada Pension Benefits Reduction
  • Central Route Peripheral Route

Great arguments. Im convinced!
He sounds smart. Im convinced!
28
Chaiken (1980)
  • Arguments for switching to a trimester system
    (from a two-semester system)
  • Manipulated
  • (a) Relevance (if accepted will be implemented
    next year or in 5 years)
  • (b) Argument strength (1 point versus 5 points)
  • (c) Speaker likeability (he believes U of T
    students are far superior or inferior to UBC
    students)

29
Chaiken (1980)
30
Personality and Processing
  • NEED FOR COGNITION
  • a personality variable reflecting the extent to
    which people engage in and enjoy effortful
    cognitive activities
  • Sample Items
  • I usually end up deliberating about issues even
    when they do not affect me personally
  • I only think as hard as I have to (R)

31
Effectiveness of Persuasion
  1. Communicator (who said it?)
  2. Message (what was said?)
  3. Audience (to whom?)

32
Communicator
  • Credibility
  • Expertise
  • Trustworthiness / Likeability
  • Attractiveness
  • Physical appeal
  • Similarity

33
Message
  • Not trying to persuade
  • Two-sided (versus one-sided) arguments are better
    if you can refute the other side
  • Primacy versus recency

34
Message Primacy/Recency
  • Primacy Effects Information presented first has
    the most influence
  • Message1Message2..Response
  • Recency Effects Information presented last has
    the most influence
  • Message 1Message2Response

35
Message
  • Not trying to persuade
  • Two-sided (versus one-sided) arguments are better
    if you can refute the other side
  • Primacy versus recency
  • Emotion (happiness fear)

36
Audience
  • Intelligence
  • Higher more difficult to persuade
  • Self-Esteem
  • Moderate most easily persuaded

37
Resisting Persuasion
  • Attitude Inoculation the process of making
    people immune to attempts to change their
    attitudes by initially exposing them to small
    doses of the arguments against their position.

38
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com