Title: LECTURE 5 Conformity and Persuasion
1LECTURE 5Conformity and Persuasion
- June 27th, 2005
- PSYC 2120 (A) 3.0 Social Psychology
When you think of the long and gloomy history of
man, you will find more hideous crimes have been
committed in the name of obedience than in the
name of rebellion. C.P. Snow
2Syllabus change
- Chapter 13 switched to next
weeks Prejudice lecture - Next week will cover Prejudice and Intergroup
Relations (Chapter 13) on Monday, Aggression and
Altruism on Tuesday, and Attraction on Wednesday
3New Schedule
- This week
- Mon June 27th Conformity (6) and Persuasion (7)
- Tues June 28th Group Influence (8) and
Stereotype threat - Wed June 29th Gender, Culture and Emotional
Expression (5) - Thursday MIDTERM 2 (covers chapters 5-8 and
this weeks lectures) - Next week
- Mon July 4th Prejudice (12) AND Intergroup
Relations (13) - Tues July 5th Aggression Prosocial Behaviour
(10 9) - Wed July 6th Attraction and Intimacy (11)
- Friday July 8th FINAL EXAM (Multiple choice
covers chapters 9-13 short-answer questions are
cumulative)
4Road Map
- Conformity
- Informational Social Influence
- Normative Social Influence
- Obedience
- Persuasion
- Two routes (central peripheral)
- Resisting persuasion
5Conformity
- Definition A change in behaviour or beliefs due
to the real or imagined influence of other
people. - Social Norms the implicit or explicit rules a
group has for the acceptable behaviours, values,
and beliefs of its members
6Informational Social Influence
- Conforming because we believe that others
interpretation of an ambiguous situation is more
correct than ours and will help us choose an
appropriate course of action. - Acceptance Conformity that involves both acting
and believing in accord with social pressure.
7Autokinetic Study (Sherif, 1936)
8Chameleon Effect
- Definition The nonconscious mimicry of the
postures, mannerisms, and facial expressions of
ones interaction partner - Theorize that the mere perception of anothers
behaviour can automatically increase the
likelihood of engaging in that behaviour oneself.
9Chemeleon Effect
- Chartrand and Bargh (1999)
10When do we conform to informational social
influence?
- When the situation is ambiguous
- Fire alarms
- When there is a crisis
- When others are experts
11Normative Social Influence
- Conforming in order to be liked and accepted or
to fulfil others expectations this type of
conformity results in public compliance (but not
necessarily private acceptance) of the groups
beliefs and behaviours - Public Compliance Conformity that involves
publicly acting in accord with social pressure
while privately disagreeing
12Social Pressure Study (Asch, 1951)
1
2
3
13Social Pressure Study (Asch, 1951)
14When do we conform to normative social influence?
- Social Impact Theory (Latane, 1981)
- Strength (how important are the people to you?)
- Immediacy (close in space and time)
- Number (how many in the group)
- Unanimous
- Can also be influenced by
- Culture (more in collectivist cultures)
- Self-Esteem (low SE may fear rejection more)
15Road Map
- Conformity
- Informational Social Influence
- Normative Social Influence
- Obedience
- Persuasion
- Two routes (central peripheral)
- Resisting persuasion
16Compliance
- Definition a change in behaviour due to a direct
request from another person. - Obedience conformity in response to the commands
of an authority figure
17Mindless Compliance
- Obeying internalized social norms, without
deliberating about ones actions - Secretary study This paper is to be returned
immediately to Room 238 through interoffice mail
18Door-in-the-face
- Presented with a LARGE request (expected to
refuse), followed by a smaller, more reasonable
request (expected to accept) - Operates due to the reciprocity norm (if I do
something nice for you, you should do something
nice for me) - Not to be confused with foot-in-the-door (due to
self-perception)
19Milgrams (1963) Obedience Study
- Teachers believe they are delivering shocks to
a learner (randomly assigned to the roles). - Strongly encouraged by the experimenter to
continue, even when the learner protests.
20Milgrams Obedience Study
- Normative social influence It is absolutely
essential that you continue (I did commit to
doing this studywhat will he think of me if I
mess up his study now?) - Informational social influence
ambiguity/novelty of the situation when unsure,
we look to the expert (the experimenter)
21Milgrams Obedience Study
- Additional Factors
- In automatic pilot to the obey experimenter
norm - Fast-pace doesnt allow for much thought
- Increased in small increments (like
foot-in-the-door).
22Resisting Social Pressure
- Reactance an attempt to restore ones sense of
freedom.
23Definitions
- Conformity A change in behaviour or beliefs due
to the real or imagined influence of other
people. - Informational Social Influence (Acceptance)
Conforming because we believe that others
interpretation of an ambiguous situation is more
correct than ours. - Normative Social Influence (Public Conformity)
Conforming in order to be liked and accepted or
to fulfil others expectations this type of
conformity results in public compliance (but not
necessarily private acceptance) of the groups
beliefs and behaviours - Compliance a change in behaviour due to a direct
request from another person. - Mindless Compliance Obeying internalized social
norms, without deliberating about ones actions - Obedience conformity in response to the commands
of an authority figure - Reactance an attempt to restore ones sense of
freedom.
24Road Map
- Conformity
- Informational Social Influence
- Normative Social Influence
- Compliance and Obedience
- Persuasion
- Two routes (central peripheral)
- Resisting persuasion
25Persuasive Communication
- A communication (e.g., a speech or television ad)
advocating a particular side of an issue. - You should stop studying and come to the party
- I think you should go grocery shopping instead
of me - Commercial to buy a swiffer
26Persuasion
- Central Route Persuasion
- A focus on the actual content of the arguments
that stimulates thinking in favour of the new
attitude (also known as systematic processing)
Keys Ability and Motivation - Peripheral Route Persuasion
- Acceptance is triggered by incidental cues (i.e.,
attractiveness of the speaker) without much
thinking (also known as heuristic-based
processing)
27Canada Pension Benefits Reduction
- Central Route Peripheral Route
Great arguments. Im convinced!
He sounds smart. Im convinced!
28Chaiken (1980)
- Arguments for switching to a trimester system
(from a two-semester system) - Manipulated
- (a) Relevance (if accepted will be implemented
next year or in 5 years) - (b) Argument strength (1 point versus 5 points)
- (c) Speaker likeability (he believes U of T
students are far superior or inferior to UBC
students)
29Chaiken (1980)
30Personality and Processing
- NEED FOR COGNITION
- a personality variable reflecting the extent to
which people engage in and enjoy effortful
cognitive activities - Sample Items
- I usually end up deliberating about issues even
when they do not affect me personally - I only think as hard as I have to (R)
31Effectiveness of Persuasion
- Communicator (who said it?)
- Message (what was said?)
- Audience (to whom?)
32Communicator
- Credibility
- Expertise
- Trustworthiness / Likeability
- Attractiveness
- Physical appeal
- Similarity
33Message
- Not trying to persuade
- Two-sided (versus one-sided) arguments are better
if you can refute the other side - Primacy versus recency
34Message Primacy/Recency
- Primacy Effects Information presented first has
the most influence - Message1Message2..Response
- Recency Effects Information presented last has
the most influence - Message 1Message2Response
35Message
- Not trying to persuade
- Two-sided (versus one-sided) arguments are better
if you can refute the other side - Primacy versus recency
- Emotion (happiness fear)
36Audience
- Intelligence
- Higher more difficult to persuade
- Self-Esteem
- Moderate most easily persuaded
37Resisting Persuasion
- Attitude Inoculation the process of making
people immune to attempts to change their
attitudes by initially exposing them to small
doses of the arguments against their position.
38Questions?