Title: Training and Development
1Lecture 4
2Lecture Outline
- Training defined
- Why is training important?
- Production techniques and training and
development - Recent trends in training and development
- Training for organisational growth
- Capturing value from knowledge
- The training process
- Australias training reform agenda
3What is Training?
- Nadler and Nadler (1989) suggest that training is
learning provided by employers to employees and
related to jobs. Education relates to future jobs
and development is not related to jobs at all but
to an individuals dimensions. - There is a common view that training consists of
formal activities that allow people to acquire or
refine knowledge, skills and attitudes needed for
their current jobs. - Smith (1996) defines training as a planned
process to achieve effective performance in an
activity or range of activities. - Laird (1985) defines training as the acquisition
of technology that permits employees to perform
to a standard.
4Why is training important?
- Training carried out in an ad hoc way.
- Pressures of globalisation of markets, rapid
technological change, an ageing workforce and
changes in social values have been well
documented. Included in these demands are
quality assurance, adaptation, flexibility,
service and innovation. - International comparisons of employer
contributions to training have led to a view that
Australia needs to improve enterprise level
training.
5Lean production techniques and training (McDuffie
1995)
- Lean production captures the minimisation of
buffers and the expansion of workforce skill and
concept knowledge required for problem-solving
and involvement with production processes. - Emphasises the relationship between the social
and technical aspects of production. - In JIT a bad part draws immediate attention and
must be dealt with to prevent the production
system from grinding to a holt. - Innovative HRM practices are likely to contribute
to improved economic performance when three
conditions are met
6Lean production techniques and training (McDuffie
1995)
- When employees possess knowledge and skills that
management lack. - When employees are motivated to apply this skill
and knowledge through discretionary effort. - When the firms business strategy can only be
achieved when employees contribute such
discretionary effort. - Link to training and HRD more broadly - skilled
and knowledge workers that are not motivated are
unlikely to contribute discretionary effort. - Motivated workers who lack skills or knowledge
may contribute discretionary effort with little
impact.
7High performance workplaces and training.
- Whitfield (2000)
- Firms exhibiting high performance work practices
have higher levels of training and those with a
comprehensive set of these (or bundles) exhibit
much higher levels than those which do not. - There is extensive evidence to suggest that
bundles of workplace practices are important
and the adoption of individual practices in
isolation does not seem to have a significant
impact on a firm or its performance (Huselid
1995). - Link between training and performance.
8Training for skill flexibility
- The aim of skill enhancement is functional
flexibility whereby workers can shift between
work activities - enable multi-skilling and
broad-banding of job classifications. - Continued opportunity for skill utilisation - a
skill is only a reality when a person exercises
it (Schofield 1985). - Task specific training on the job - its ability
to increase adaptability for future unknown
skills has also been challenged. - Critical elements of the supervisor's approach
trainees freedom to tackle job themselves
trainee errors and self evaluation important
learning tools trainer developed ways of guiding
rather than telling.
9Recent trends in training
- Performance appraisal training, how to operate
new equipment, new employee orientation,
leadership and time management training remain at
the top of training priorities. - Creative thinking skills have increased
- Galagan (1986) describes a number of trends that
will continue in the next 10 years - Internal organisational courses will replace
off-the-shelf courses trained in how to learn
and how to get and use information when they need
it. - The amount of training for middle and senior
executives will increase - link to
organisational culture. Senior executives will
attempt to integrate organisational strategy with
training.
10Training for organisational growth
- Practice of training based on the assumption
about human nature - McGregor (1960) Theory X and
Theory Y. - Rogers (1983) stressed the importance of respect
for individuals, freedom, self-directedness and
responsibility. - Training and the workplace culture of
empowerment. - Linking organisational strategy, benchmarking,
marketing learning programs, championing,
mentoring and coaching. - Skilling employees to design, deliver and assess
workplace learning instead of being the sole
focus of training.
11Training for growth, cont.
- Transfer of learning is a crucial issue - the
extent to which what is learned in training
sessions is applied and maintained on the job to
increase performance and productivity. - Garavaglia (1995) suggests a number of activities
that can increase the transfer of learning - the
removal of personal and organisational barriers,
creating sound training programs, fostering
responsibility by all parties and reminding
people to maintain changed behaviours. - Key is mindset change - performance improved.
12Training for organisational growth, cont.
- Continuous improvement - training employees for
jobs that are new, refining their skills to meet
new conditions and ensuring attainment of
superior performance. - Documentation of training activities to
demonstrate that training has had a positive
impact on the desired business goals. - Recognition of the growth in knowledge workers
and intellectual property as a source of
competitive advantage (Teece 1984).
13Capturing value from knowledge (Teece 1998)
- While knowledge assets are grounded in the
experience and expertise of individuals, firms
provide the physical, social and resource
allocation structure so that knowledge can be
shaped into competencies. - How these competencies and knowledge assets are
configured and deployed will dramatically shape
competitive outcomes and the commercial success
of the enterprise. - Competitive advantage comes from difficult to
replicate knowledge assets and the manner in
which they are deployed. - Tacit knowledge is difficult to articulate in a
way that is complete and meaningful.
14Training for organisational growth
- Information that is transferred will be
considered meaningful by those who receive will
depend on whether they are familiar with the code
as well as the different contexts in which it is
used. - Tacit knowledge is slow and costly to transmit
(eg. org. culture). - Knowledge assets are difficult to replicate. Even
understanding what all of the relevant routines
are that support a particular competence may not
be enough to replicate the competitive adv. Many
organisational routines are quite tacit in
nature. Imitation is hindered by the fact that
routines are often not stand-alone. - Understanding the overall logic is crucial.
15The training process
- Step 1 - Define objectives
- Step 2 - Gather organisational information
- Step 3 - Establish training needs
- Step 4 - Establish training plan
16Needs assessment
- The model emphasises careful needs assessment,
controlled learning experiences designed to
achieve instructional objectives, pre-determined
performance criteria and collection of evaluation
information to provide feedback. - Needs assessment - organisational analysis,
person analysis, and task and knowledge, skill
and ability analysis. - Designing training programs
- Evaluation - selecting evaluating criteria
training validity, transfer validity,
intra-organisational validity and
inter-organisational validity
17Program evaluation
- Based on a survey of more than 100 firms that
evaluate training, 75 measured reactions to
training but less than 50 measured learning,
less than 20 attempted to measure behaviour
changes and only 15 tried to measure on-the-job
results of training. - Why organisations need to evaluate? - diagnostic
issues, economic and credibility concerns and
legal considerations. - Why organisations do not evaluate - neglect of
top management, lack of research skills among
training executives, uncertainty regarding what
to evaluate and misperceptions of evaluation as
costly and risky.
18Measures of training effectiveness
- Nature of criteria - to serve their purpose,
criteria must be relevant, reliable, capable of
discriminating among employees and practical. - Multiple criteria - evaluation criteria should
measure several important dimensions of
performance that are relatively independent of
each other - single measures fail to capture the
full range of desired outcomes. - Types of criteria - reactions criteria learning
criteria behavioural criteria and results
criteria. - Evaluation designs - post-test-only and
pre-test-post-test designs pre-test-post-test
with a control group and time series design.
19Australias training reform agenda
- A survey of the national training system in
Australia suggests in general terms the top-down,
centrally driven bureaucratic processes are
generating strong dissatisfaction amongst
employers. For the training reforms to work
effectively in the workplace, business needs need
to have a much greater capacity to influence how
resources are allocated as well as having a
greater say in the overall framework. - Broad range of initiatives heading the national
training reform agenda since 1990.
20Survey of major users of the training system
- At the end of 1993, while there were 70 sets of
industry and cross-industry competencies in
place, there were only 21 competency-based
training courses registered with the NTB. - Develop a training culture - a greater role for
employer associations, employers and trade
unions. - Problems with the Australian Standards Framework
- it needs to be industry driven relationship
with wage levels too rigid because it does not
fit industry requirements descriptions are
imprecise. - Difficulties in implementing the training reform
agenda absences of quality assurance procedures.
21Survey of major users of the training system
- The major obstacle to development and
implementation is the apathy of most employers. - Coming to terms with the potential diversity in
approaches to assessment between enterprises,
industries and providers and the need to
integrate on and off-the-job training. - Poor functioning of the training market - central
planning new connections are needed between the
national training objectives and local
initiatives, connections which provide employers
with the incentives to invest in training and
remove impediments to the investment.
22Training guarantee levy
- TGL requires employers (with payrolls greater
than220 000 in 1992-1993) to spend a minimum of
1.5 per cent of their payroll on training staff. - Monies not spent by the employer can be donated
to designated organisations undertaking training
or forfeited to ATO. - Employer resistance - had not been successful in
encouraging small firms to invest in training
imposed obligation regard expenditure to be
minimised should have targeted specific
purposes red tape. - Disbanded mid-1990s.