Title: Rethinking Course Development: Competing on Quality
1Rethinking Course Development Competing on
Quality
- Larry Gould
- American Association of State Colleges and
Universities (AASCU), Academic Affairs Winter
Meeting, February 9, 2008, Tempe, Arizona
2Where in the World is FHSU?
3About Fort Hays State University
- Founding member of the Higher Learning
Commissions (HLC/NCA) alternative accreditation
track known as the Academic Quality Improvement
Program (AQIP) - Academic Programming
- 52 undergraduate degree programs
- 19 graduate degree programs
- 25 programs completely accessible off-campus
- General Structure
- Three divisions academic, student affairs,
admin-finance - Four academic colleges, graduate school, distance
education delivery unit called the Virtual
College
4About Fort Hays State University
- Branding Tagline Affordable Success
- Enrollment The Way We Were (Fall, 1998)
- On-campus 4718
- Off-campus 839
- Grand total 5557
- Enrollment The Way We Are (Fall, 2007)
- On-campus 4449
- Off-campus 5375 (2300 in China)
- Grand total 9824
5Distance Education Course Development at Fort
Hays State University
- Historical Context
- The First Wave Courses
- The Second Wave Programs
- The Third Wave Quality Assurance
6Why Facilitate a Third Wave of Distance
Education Course Development?
- A Changing Competitive Landscape Delivery Mode
Is No Longer a Niche Growth Opportunity - A Changing Competitive Landscape Diversity of
Schools, Programs and Approaches - A Changing Value Proposition Beyond Convenience,
Flexibility and the Adult Learner - Enhancing the Value Proposition Positioning and
Differentiation Strategies
7Refining the FHSU Message to the Consumer
Perceptions of Quality
- Positioning price, geography, faculty, product,
performance, etc. - Differentiation affordable, traditional campus,
responsive, 26 programs, high student
satisfaction, etc. - Using Quality Creating Performance Indicators
and Transitioning to the Age of Brands
8Facilitating Quality Through Policy and Process
- How do we achieve differentiation and brand
recognition through performance indicators? - How do we respond to learner feedback to effect
perceptions of quality? - The Answer Rethinking and Recasting the Distance
Education Course Development Process
9The Process of Rethinking the Process
- Results Management Student Evaluations, NSSE,
Noel-Levitz, etc. -
- Virtual College Advisory Committee
- Center for Teaching Excellence and Learning
Technologies (CTELT) - Office of Quality Management
- Provosts Council
10Elements and Implications
- Three pathways to course development
- Incorporates national standards of best
practices (Quality Matters) to ensure creative
instructional design through rubric based process
and modeling - Authorizing of process driven by department,
college and institutional needs - Increases efficient use of scarce resources
(people and time)
11Elements and Implications
- Linked to academic quality improvement work
completed during Year of the Department - Faculty-driven, collegial peer review, and
team-based - Designed to improve both on- and off-campus
courses - Process includes phases and steps that promote
faculty enhancement and learning
12Elements and Implications
- Recognition that teaching on-line can be
overwhelming at first and different from F2F - Intended to bring a diversity of knowledge about
course development to the institution and promote
dissemination and archiving of best practices and
new thinking - The new process strives to improve FHSUs
competitive positioning and differentiation
through enhanced performance indicators
(perception of quality, retention and student
satisfaction)
13Elements and Implications
- Second horizon goals
- Build a cadre and community of on-line quality
champions - Develop a culture of collective responsibility
for high-quality course development
14- To the student When you turn your course on,
does it return the favor? - Thanks
- Questions?
- Link to full process and other information
- lthttp//www.fhsu.edu/virtualcollegegt