Title: Rethinking Professional Education and Development
1Rethinking Professional Education and Development
- Clinical Supervision
- Factors influencing practice
- Dr Sarah Newton
- Plymouth Teaching Primary Care Trust
- 9th October 2007
2Clinical Supervision Factors influencing
practiceTheoretical cycle of learning and
practice
3Clinical Supervision Factors influencing
practicePrevious work
- Learning and putting into practice is a complex
relationship (Fish and Twinn, 1997) - Complexity increases as do the number of
influential factors (Ellis Ladany, 1997
Goodyear and Bernard, 1998 Davy, 2002)
4Clinical Supervision Factors influencing
practiceWhat is Clinical Supervision?
-
- An exchange between practicing professionals to
enable the development of professionals skills,
an opportunity to sustain and develop
professional practice - Faugier and Butterworth 1994.
5Clinical Supervision Factors influencing
practiceWhat is Clinical Supervision?
- It is distinct from line and caseload
management, professional leadership and personal
therapy, although there are some commonalities
with these and pre post qualification
training/learning frameworks such as placement
supervision, mentorship, preceptorship etc.
6Clinical Supervision Factors influencing
practiceWhat is Clinical Supervision?
- Essentially engagement in the practice of
clinical supervision not only improves
professional practice and effectiveness but also
attends to the impact of the work on the staff
member. It therefore has the potential to nurture
and sustain personal wellbeing in professional
practice.
7Clinical Supervision Factors influencing
practiceInskipp and Proctors (1993) Model of
Supervision
Clinical Supervision
8Clinical Supervision Factors influencing
practiceWhat are the Factors?
- Individual (needs (identified), perceived
relevance, motivation, personal circumstances,
pay) - Organisational support for learning (funding,
time away from usual duties, additional
resources) - Organisational support for practice (time, place,
resources, culture, context) - Multi professional learning and working
- Partnership working across organisations
9Clinical Supervision Factors influencing
practiceWhy the focus on clinical supervision in
PtPCT?
- Enabling Excellence quality improvement programme
- Why was clinical supervision not taking place?
(audits 2002 2005) - Some training had taken place-generic and models
of supervision based on psychological models for
therapies - Few areas of practice had developed
- Not always routinely and regularly practiced
- Practiced in wrong places at wrong times
- Professional differences and barriers
- Individual factors confidence, motivation, poor
understanding of potential personal benefits - No whole organisation approach
- Focus on performance targets and away from staff
wellbeing, despite Improving Working Lives
initiatives
10Clinical Supervision Factors influencing
practiceClinical Supervision Steering Group
11Clinical Supervision Factors influencing
practiceModel to sustain practice
Lead reports to Clinical Supervision Steering
Group
12Clinical Supervision Factors influencing
practiceResources developed by the Clinical
Supervision Steering Group
- Coordinator of Clinical Supervision
- Clinical Supervision Policy
- Clinical Supervision Contract Paperwork
- Training- one day courses from February 2006
- Foundation Training for Supervisees
- Supervisor training
- Course materials
- curriculum, handouts, pre-course self assessment,
DVD (Actor Factor) - Toolkit
- Audits of course attendees and managers of
services and professions 2007
13Clinical Supervision Factors influencing
practiceFunding sources
- Workforce Development Confederation Strategic
Health Authority funding for Coordinator
(32,000) - KESW funding (11,250) for training on the basis
of funding provided by the PtPCT (20,250) - Knowledge Exploitation South West
- KESW funding to extend training
- Senior personnel time - Plymouth teaching PCT,
University of Plymouth and University College
Plymouth St Mark and St John - Professional and managerial time Staff of PtPCT
14Clinical Supervision Factors influencing
practiceMaking the learning and practice
relevant and appealing
- Agenda for Change
- Job Profile Factors
- Knowledge and Skills Framework KSFC1
communication, C2 personal and people development
C3 health and safety, C4 service improvement, C5
quality, C6 diversity G1 learning and
development, G6 people management - Appraisal
- Opportunities
- for further studies in partnership courses with
accreditation - Standards for Better Health
- Second domain-clinical and cost effectiveness
- Ethos
- aim for highest standards for engagement in and
practice of clinical supervision whether Trust
Policy or Professional guidance
15Clinical Supervision Factors influencing
practiceAudit of course attendees and their
subsequent practice
- Since February 2006
- 381 attended Foundation day
- 179 attended Supervisor day
- 90 attended both courses
- 419 audit questionnaires sent out September 2007
- To date 76 returned completed (18)
16Clinical Supervision Factors influencing
practiceAudit of course attendees and their
subsequent practice
- 57/76 are actively receiving supervision
- Majority in individual supervision, others in
group supervision - Majority in monthly one hour supervision sessions
and happy with this - Most in PtPCT time and on PtPCT property and
linking with Appraisal process, KSF, Personal
Development plan and CPD logs - 40/76 active as supervisors
- Each supervise 1-11 members of staff
17Clinical Supervision Factors influencing
practiceAudit of course attendees and their
subsequent practice
- Majority have read the policy
- Just over half supervisees and half supervisors
have written contracts for supervision - 21/59 noted practical concerns about time
18Clinical Supervision Factors influencing
practiceAudit of managers of services and
professions
- 151 questionnaires sent to managers and
professional leads in September 2007 - 16 responses to date
- 17 service areas represented
- 192 staff commented on (124 qualified)
- 79/192 staff receiving supervision (60 qualified)
- Majority in 4-6 weekly supervision
19Clinical Supervision Factors influencing
practiceAudit of managers of services and
professions
- 45 staff providing clinical supervision
- 54/122 job descriptions mention need for
supervision - 12/17 managers and professional leads referred to
supervision in appraisal - Some noticeable changes in motivation, role
clarity, team working, sickness levels
20Clinical Supervision Factors influencing
practiceQuestions arising from the audit
information
- What about the staff and managers/leads who have
not repliedare they engaging in practice or not? - How does this data relate to the course
evaluation comments? (work to be completed)
21Clinical Supervision Factors influencing
practiceChallenges ahead
- Continuing training through opening up to other
organisations with paid places - Partnership course with the University of
Plymouth for supervisors - Toolkit publication for self-learning and as a
reference source - Continuing the work through ensuring integration
with continuing changes and priorities in the NHS
and PtPCT
22Clinical Supervision Factors influencing
practiceConclusions
- Working relationships within and activities of
the CSSG have - Driven the outcomes achieved
- Fostered creative solutions to potential and
actual barriers and challenges - Configuration of the CSSG has been mirrored in
all subsequent activities and outputs - multi-professional
- cross-organisational support and endorsement
- Transformations from learning to practice in the
CSSG are beginning to be evidenced within the
workforce of the PtPCT
23Clinical Supervision Factors influencing
practiceConclusions
- Multi-professional learning and working is here
to stay and can open new options and
possibilities that enable more people to benefit
from activities - Partnership working across organisations can be
powerful and enrich the work achieved perhaps
more than would be possible in one organisation
alone
24Clinical Supervision Factors influencing practice
25Thanks to
- Ruth Clemow, Associate Dean (Learning and
Teaching), Plymouth University - Maggie Cooper, Dean of Health, University College
Plymouth St Mark and St John - Hazel Bending, Lecturer, University College
Plymouth St Mark and St John - Members of the Clinical Supervision Steering
Group - Mary McClarey, Head of Clinical Effectiveness and
Research Steve Waite, Director of Operations,
Plymouth teaching Primary Care Trust - Clare Frampton and Leanne Walker Clinical
Psychology Services Plymouth teaching Primary
Care Trust
26Clinical Supervision Factors influencing
practiceReferences
- Butterworth, T. and Faugier, J. (Eds) (1999).
Clinical Supervision and mentorship in nursing.
London Chapman and Hall. - Davy, J. (2002). Discursive reflections on a
research agenda for clinical supervision.
Psychology and Psychotherapy, 75, pp221-238. - Department for Health (July 2004, updated April
2006). Standards for Better Health. London
Department for Health.
27Clinical Supervision Factors influencing
practiceReferences
- Ellis, M. V. and Ladany, N. (1997). Inferences
concerning supervisees and clients in clinical
supervision an integrative review. In C. E.
Watkins, Jr. (Ed.) Handbook of psychotherapy
supervision. New York Wiley. - Fish, D. and Twinn,S. (1997). Considering
competencies and assessing professional
competence in practice. Chapter 7, pp 142-163 in
Quality clinical supervision in the health care
professions. Edinburgh Butterworth Heinemann. -
- Goodyear, R.K. and Bernard, J. M. (1998).
Clinical Supervision Lessons from the
literature. Counselor Education and Supervision,
38, pp6-23. - Inskipp, F. Proctor, B. (1993). The art, craft
and tasks of counselling supervision. Part 1.
Making the most of supervision. Twickenham
Cascade Publications