Title: Serratia marcescens
1Serratia marcescens
2Swarming in Serratia marcescens
Wetting agents and surfactants play a critical
role in surface motility
3Vibrio parahaemolyticus has two different types
of flagella
Laf
Pof
4S. marcescens, E. coli, S. typhimurium, Proteus
5Signals
Not
Slowed motor
Iron starvation
Specific amino acids
pH changes
Oxygen gradients
Known autoinducers
6- Null hypothesis Density dependence is related to
generating wetness through some means other that
quorum sensing.
7Two major classes of swarming-defective mutants
?
8Mutants in the chemotaxis pathway are
swarming-defective in S.marcescens, E. coli S.
typhimurium
ORear et al., 1992 Harshey Matsuyama, 1994
9Cell expressing only a serine binding mutant of
Tsr
0.7 agar
0.3 agar
Burkart et al., PNAS, 1998
10The chemotaxis signaling pathway in E.
coli/Salmonella
V. Sourjik, Trends Microbiol., 2004
11che mutants are developmentally impaired
12The chemotaxis signaling pathway modulates motor
bias
V. Sourjik, Trends Microbiol., 2004
13Model for CheY as swarming regulator
14How does Che system control swarmer cell
development?
- 1. Genome-wide expression profiles of WT vs Dche
- 2. Genetic suppressor analysis of DcheY
15Sensing wetness A new role for the bacterial
flagellum Wang et al., 2005
16Time course of swarming in wild-type S.
typhimurium
100 x
25 x
Flagellar genes is not upregulated during swarming
Tim Wang
17Che mutants are developmentally impaired only on
the surface
WT(B) WT(P) cheY(B) cheY(P)
cheZ(B) cheZ(P)
3.5h
2.5h
1.5h
18Lawn morphologies and fluid retention
19Microarray Salmonella WT vs CheY Cells On Plates
WT Red (Cy5)/ CheY Green (Cy3).
20Genome-wide expression profiles of WT vs DChe
21A Model connecting the dots
1. Inhibition of Class 3 genes in Che mutants is
due to FlgM 2. FlgM accumulates intracellularly
because it cannot be exported outside 3. Export
is blocked because dry external conditions slow
filament growth (short flagella).
22Class III FlgM External checkpoint for flagellar
biogenesis
OM
CM
flgM
FliA
M
M
M
M
FliA
fliC
23Prediction FlgM levels should be lower
outside/higher inside
24Prediction restoration of hydration should
restore external FlgM
25Prediction restoration of hydration should
restore flagellation
26Prediction flgM mutation should restore class 3
gene expression
It does
27(No Transcript)
28Testing regulation of flagellar length model
Flagella stained with Texas Red-conjugated
antibody
29Testing quick response model
After shearing
Flagellate non-flagellate controls
Rosu Hughes, J. Bact. 2006
30FlgM secretion after shearing (blending)
IC Intracellular EC - Extracellular
31Class 3 FlgM as drought sensor Regulation in
reverse
32But why are che mutant colonies dry?
33Suppressors of a cheY null mutant map to the
switch complex
0.3 agar
0.7 agar
Mariconda et al., Mol. Microbiol. 2006
34Swarming can be correlated with the ability to
switch motor direction
Mariconda et al., Mol. Microbiol. 2006
mM IPTG
Chemoreceptor-less strain expressing a inducible
CW signaling fragment
35Model for CheY as swarming regulator
How does motor switching control control surface
wetness?
36Switch and Stir model
1. Flagella stick to surfaces 2. Motor switching
helps them un-stick 3. Freely rotating flagella
stir-up the surface moisture, combining it
with secreted carbohydrates to generate
slime that is so essential for movement
37Flagellum as a sensor (and generator) of external
wetness
38We may have discovered an ancient role for the
chemotaxis system! In the beginning, there was
CheY CheY could be phophorylated by other
phospho donors (AcetylP) And CheYP was
sufficient for movement The sophisticated
machinery for chemotaxis system evolved later
39Flagellum as a mechanosensor
Ab that tether Pof Mot mutations Na channel
blockers i.e. slow motor rotation Low Iron
Motor speed
Laf
Pof
McCarter et al., 1988, 1989