Title: Railway Association of Canada
1Railway Association of Canada
- Rail Issues and the Policy Making Process
Opportunities for a Better Transportation Future
in Canada - Bruce R. Burrows
- Vice-President, Public Affairs and Government
Relations - Background Briefing for Transportation Policy
Course - TC Policy Group
- Nav Canada Training and Conference Centre,
Cornwall, ON. - May 2004
2OUTLINE
- About the RAC
- Railways and Policy
- Where We Are
- Trade and Ports
- Challenges
- Short Line Sector Trends
- Governments Agenda and Rail
- Rail Can Do More Solutions
- Conclusion
3ABOUT THE RAC
- Some 60 members We are the Canadian rail
industry - Represents virtually all Railway operating in
Canada today - Class 1s CN and CPR
- Short lines Over 40 across Canada
- Passenger
- Commuter AMT, GO, WCE, Capital Railway
- Intercity VIA
- Tourist 8 across Canada
- Together members carry
- 4 million carloads annually
- 1.8 million containers and trailers
- 53 million commuters and other train travellers
4ABOUT THE RAC (contd)
- Formed in 1917 to help the war effort. Mandate
- Promote the benefits of railways in Canada
- Provide input into public policy decisions
related to the railway sector in Canada - Provide information for public, government and
industry - Coordinate rulemaking and regulatory affairs for
industry - Provide safety and operational assistance to
membership
5ABOUT THE RAC (contd)
- Moved from Montreal to Ottawa in late 2000
- Created policy and advocacy capacity
- Bolstered ongoing Safety and Operations capacity
- Working to create a more rail-friendly public
policy environment
6ABOUT THE RAC - CANADA
- The industry operates close to 50,000 kilometres
of track and employs 37,000 peopleanother 50,000
employed in supply industry in many communities - 10 billion contribution to the economy
- Over 65 of Canadas goods moving by surface
(ton-kms) depend on rail to reach their market - 300 million tonnes of rail freight are originated
every year equivalent to over 18 million
truckloads
7ABOUT THE RAC POLICY APPROACH
- As thevoice of the industry, deliver solid,
substantial information to government - Develop sound policy positions through systematic
internal consultation
- Create effective delivery mechanisms (policy
briefs, annual stats - publication, etc.)
8RAILWAYS AND POLICY CHANGE - GOALS
-
- Ongoing RAC Objective
- Ensure that public policy enables railways to
remain an efficient, safe and competitive
supplier of transportation services - 20/20 Vision
- Looking to the future, the integrated, seamless
transportation marketplace within NAFTA requires
broader policy approaches
9WHERE WE ARE
- For freight a deregulation success story
- Class 1s
- Rates are down, lowest in the world
- CN, CPR now best operating ratios in NA
- Labour productivity up substantially
- Freight subsidies have been eliminated ( 700M in
1995) - Lowest level of accidents/incidents in North
America - Short lines
- Completely new entrepreneurial focused sector
- Vital to regional economies, 25 of originated
carloads - Growing the business, competing directly with
trucks - But short of capital funds
10WHERE WE ARE (contd)
- For passenger more efficient, reducing
congestion and improving sustainability in the
corridor and in urban areas - Intercity passenger
- Business is increasing
- Operating subsidies down considerably
- Exciting new developments
- Commuter
- Considerable growth, new routes and operations
- Increased recognition of public benefits by
decision makers - Approaching 100 operating cost recovery
11Up 18 since 1990
PASSENGER KILOMETRES
1,650
1,600
1,550
1,500
1,450
millions
1,400
1,350
1,300
1,250
1,200
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
12LOWEST RATES IN THE WORLD...
- Canadian rail rates have declined 40, now the
lowest in the world
Railroads passing on their efficiency gains as a
result of competition
13Up 169 since 1990
LABOUR PRODUCTIVITY
CANADIAN RAIL INDUSTRY
1990-2002
Revenue tonne-km/employee (000)
169
10,000
9,000
8,000
7,000
6,000
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
Source RAC
14NUMBER OF NEW SHORT LINE RAILWAYS IN CANADA
SINCE 1990
60
Originated Carloads
2002
50
Short lines
Class 1's
24.5
40
75.5
30
20
10
0
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
Source Transport Canada
The number of short lines in Canada is up 200
since 1996. They account for 24 of originated
traffic ...
15WHERE WE ARE (Contd) ORIGINATED CARLOADS BY
COMMODITY GROUPING - 2002
Intermodal
18
Bulk35
Agriculture
Manufactured Miscellaneous
10
Coal
Intermodal
1
9
18
Food Products
1
Paper products.
Minerals
7
16
Fuel Chemicals
12
Forest Products
11
Metals
Machinery Auto
Merchandise47
8
7
Intermodal is the largest single business line
16WHERE WE ARE (contd)
INTERMODAL UNITS ORIGINATED (000)
(containers trailers)
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
0
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
and the fastest growing Rail is just-in-time
1710-YEAR TRENDS CROSSING/TRESPASSING FATALITIES
TOTAL
PER UNIT OF WORK
0.25
140
Trespassing Incidents
Trespassing Incidents
Crossing Collisions
120
Crossing Collisions
0.20
100
0.15
80
Number
Number
60
0.10
40
0.05
20
0.00
0
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
Year
Year
gtkm (gross tonne-kilometres)
Source Transportation Safety Board (TSB)
Source Railway Trends, Transportation Safety
Board (TSB)
Operation Lifesaver and Direction 2006, a joint
Government/Industry/publicpartnership has helped
reduced crossing/trespassing fatalities by 34
since 1994
1810-YEAR TRENDS ACCIDENTS
PER UNIT OF WORK
TOTAL
1,400
2.80
1,300
2.60
gtkm (gross tonne-kilometres)
2.40
1,200
2.20
1,100
2.00
1,000
Number
Per billion gtkm
1.80
900
1.60
800
1.40
700
1.20
600
1.00
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
Year
Year
gtkm (gross tonne-kilometres)Source Railway
Trends, Transportation Safety Board (TSB)
Source Transportation Safety Board (TSB)
Accidents per unit of work on Canadian railways
are down 29 since 1994
19CANADA A TRADE DEPENDENT NATION
- Over 40 of GDP comes from exports of goods and
services. Highest in G-8. Rail moves half of
goods. - NAFTA volumes, now massive, were growing at 10
per year until 2001. Most Canadian exports go to
U.S. - Ports of Vancouver, Montreal and Halifax key for
international trade (vital to North American
economy) in Canada
20EXPORTS AND THE RAILWAY ROLE
Canadian GDP
Canadian Exports
41Exports
By Rail 51
21CANADAA TRADE DEPENDENT NATION (contd.)
- Trade relationship needs to be nurtured and
handled carefully - Customers look at overall efficiency, cost and
reliability of integrated supply chains - Numerous Canadian industries are consolidating
into a continental structure under NAFTA
transportation is becoming globally and
technologically seamless - Canada is a convenient entry point for others
looking to access the growing NAFTA marketplace
22CANADA A TRADE DEPENDENT NATION (contd.)
- Canada is leading export market for 38 US states,
and with NAFTA, a North American rail industry is
emerging. - 1.7 billion of goods traded daily with the
U.S., or over 1M per minute efficient and
cost-effective border is critical - From 1992 to 2002, goods exports to the US rose
from 72 to 85 of Canadian total - Rail handles a significant share of surface
traffic across the border Ontario Corridors
handle 65 of all Canada/US trade by value (with
80 of rail traffic handled through Ontario
gateways) - The competitiveness of ports and railways is
highly linked - Rail service is frequently the largest cost
consideration for port customers in routing their
traffic
23PORTS AND RAIL AN INTEGRATED RELATIONSHIP
- Canadian industry depends on rail to get the
product to market - 39 of Canadas rail activity is associated with
import or export movements through Canadas major
ports - Canadian ports and railways are in direct
competition with U.S. to deliver goods in North
America - Rails availability, price and quality are of
prime consideration when examining routing
options - The fortunes of a key port are tightly bound to
those of the long-haul railways serving it - Ocean 24 hour advance EDI manifest opportunity
for early rail billings but need proper
risk-based intervention
24ECONOMIC CHALLENGES
- Railways face intense competition
- - Other Canadian railways
- - US carriers
- - Other modes
- - Source competition
- Risk of increased regulation (esp. Access)
- Financial stability is new
- Capacity and investment
- - Network Standard (286,000 Lbs)
- - More transloads/sidings
- - Government /Class 1 partners
- Market imbalance
- - Full-cost accounting for roads
- - User pay principle for all modes
25PERCENTAGE OF CAPITAL SPENDING TO REVENUES
25
Railways (Average)
Integrated Oils
18
16
Cement
16
Oil and Gas Services
11
Transportation
10
Automotive
Chemicals
10
9
Industrial Products
9
Paper Products/Packaging
Steel
8
6
Forest Products
5
Metals
10
Weighted Group Average
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Source Globe and Mail
Railways are the most capital intensive industry
26SECURITY THE BORDER CHALLENGES
- Events of September 11th have underlined
security and impact of U.S. response on Canada - Economic slow-down was exacerbated
- Canadian exports to U.S. declined 7.8 Billion
in 2001 most decline was by truck and air - Careful control and processing of individuals
crossing borders - Need for new spending by governments (Federal
Budgets and 30 Point Border Accord)
27SECURITY THE BORDER CHALLENGES (contd.)
- Ongoing risk of tightening of US security posture
at Canadian border - Long term Canadian economic performance closely
tied to border efficiency potential for
disinvestment - Bureaucratic reorganization and decision-making
risks (e.g., DHS with CBP in U.S. and PSEP with
CBS in Canada) - Commensurate congestion, land use, gas
consumption and emission concerns growing - Continental integration of policies
- Business as Usual not sustainable recent AASHTO
report concludes U.S. cant afford to build
enough highways to meet demand must look to rail
28FISCAL CHALLENGE
- Canadian railway taxes are much higher than taxes
on U.S. Railways reducing Canadian
competitiveness - Higher taxes reduce competitiveness because of
- - Increased operating costs
- - Decreased earnings available for
investment - Government taxes three major inputs purchased by
railways - - Locomotive fuel and sales tax
- Property taxes
- Payroll taxes
- Railways face tax inequity pay taxes but assume
all their own roadway costs (i.e. user pay)
29Railways paid 644 million in taxes in 2002
TAX PAID BY CANADIAN RAILWAYS
2002
Total
644 million
Payroll tax
Locomotive fuel excise tax
156
168
Income tax
38
Property tax
143
Capital tax
customs duties
42
Other sales tax
97
Source RAC
30OTHER CHALLENGES
- Population growth is significant
- Truck growing rapidly 61 by 2020
- Congestion is unsustainable in Toronto,
Vancouver, etc - Quality of life concerns growing land use,
air,safety - Infrastructure costs to government
31OTHER CHALLENGES (contd)
- Projected growth between 1995-2020
32SHORT LINE SECTOR TRENDS
CANADIAN SHORT LINES
TOTAL REVENUES
650
9.4
600
-5.3
-0.7
6.8
550
22.8
(millions)
500
450
400
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
Source RAC
Similarly, revenue has plateaued
33CANADIAN SHORT LINE AVERAGE (RAC MEMBERS)
OPERATING RATIO
91.0
89.0
90.0
87.0
87.1
85.0
84.4
83.0
83.6
82.8
81.0
82.0
79.0
77.0
75.0
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
Source RAC
Operating ratios are creeping up
34GOVERNMENTS AGENDA
- In Martin government announcements and Speech
from the Throne, key themes relevant to surface
transportation in Canada - New deal for cities
- Building a 21st century economy
- U.S. Canada relations
- Strengthening social foundations
- Sustainable Growth and Energy-Efficient
Transportation - Minister Valeris 4 Pillars
35GOVERNMENTS AGENGA
- These involve six relevant public policy
criteria - - Congestion
- - Emissions
- - Competitiveness
- - Cost to government
- - Land use
- - Safety
36AGENDA HOW RAIL CAN HELP
- Congestion
- - 1 freight train up to 280 trucks
- - 1 passenger train up to 1400 cars (GO
trains 48 lanes) - Emissions
- - 5 times less GHG emissions per unit of work
- - Significantly lower on other emissions
as well - - Commuter trains generate 25 as many
GHGs as urban autos/km - Competitiveness
- Significant productivity gains which have been
passed on to customers in lower rates - Service levels increased considerably (new
scheduled services)
37AGENDA HOW RAIL CAN HELP (contd)
- Cost to Governments/Society
- Rail corridors are privately owned, built,
maintained and financed - User pay mini reliance on publicly funded
highways - Land use
- 1/3 of that of highways
- Several studies have shown that trucks cover only
50 of their highway/environmental costs - Safety
- Private, dedicated, secure corridors with own
police service - Safest mode of transportation
38RAIL CAN DO MORE CLIMATE CHANGE
Transport GHG Emissions - 1990
Total 131.2 megatonnes
Aviation
10
Other
People
3
Road
Road
People
Freight
50
26
Rail freight
5
Marine
freight
6
Source Natural Resources Canada
39RAIL CAN DO MORE CLIMATE CHANGE
Source Natural Resources Canada
40RAIL CAN DO MORE INTERMODAL SOLUTIONS
- Railways have made major investments in
infrastructure and intermodal systems to
attract traffic - New fuel efficient locomotives and innovative
rolling stock (e.g. double stack container
cars) and high throughput terminals - Short line railways have attracted traffic
for short hauls and as feeders to the
greater rail network - People also moving intermodally (car/rail,
bus/rail) - Existing rail capacity is an alternative to
costly expansion of highways
41RAIL CAN DO MORE INTERMODAL SOLUTIONS (contd)
- Reduces shipping and travel costs and cost of
goods transfer - Addresses public objectives for environment, fuel
conservation, safetyand land use - Encourages the most efficient transportation
output through acombination of modes - incl.
trucks, for example, that offer - Just in time delivery
- Geared to smaller shipments
- Cost effective over short to medium distances
- Cooperative partnership with truckers who face
driver issues and road congestion most
effective mode over longer distance / rail also
moving into shorter haul markets - Some operations / partner changes required
42 RAIL SOLUTIONS BORDER INITIATIVES
- Electronic commerce
- Significant investment in information technology
- Automated customs transactions and pre-filing
systems in place for the vast majority of rail
traffic improved customer service - What else can be done? Better alignment of
customs policies needed, with equitable treatment
across modes, including - 1) Canada U.S. external border for uniform
- inspection and security clearance of
containers - 2) Efficient customs inspections of domestic
shipments at in-land border (or away from border
where possible) - 3) Integrate systems to link Canadian and U.S.
customs - computer and data systems
- 4) Pre-qualify low risk customers and their
- commodities
- Working with AAR and various government
organizations on security
43 RAIL SOLUTIONS BORDER INITIATIVES (contd.)
- New Declaration of Principles (DOP) with CBP to
establish VACIS machines at 9 crossings
pre-screening system gives 100 coverage - Vast majority of domestic rail traffic includes
BIG THREE auto companies, petro-chemicals, forest
products and some other bulk most are C-TPAT
companies with low risk cargo - Targeting and examination of high-risk shipments
will be performed at these key sites plan
incorporates risk assessment and comprehensive
supply chain security (CSI principles) - Rail industry recently commended by U.S. agencies
for being one of first to develop a detailed
security management plan CN, CPR and others are
C-TPAT and PIP registered
44RAIL SOLUTIONS BORDER INITIATIVES (contd.)
- Consequences
- To implement these security measures, rail will
have to spend millions of dollars - Seeking support from Border Infrastructure Fund
(other modes already supported) - Advance EDI manifest with 2 hours prior notice
- New FDA Bioterrorism regulations on food (4
hours) - Explosive regulations are burdensome
- Bottom line enhanced security and trade go
hand-in-hand, inland. Upon full implementation
of protocols, rail will be most secure and
reliable system for bulk and time-sensitive
shipments
45RAIL CAN DO MORE INFRASTRUCTURE
- In June 2002, RAC submitted a proposal for
private/public partnering on specific strategic
rail infrastructure (CSIF) - Upgrading short lines to 286,000lb loadings
- 50/50 private/public
- Over 40 grade separation projects identified
- In 2003, RAC added a new component on
intermodal/multi modal reloads and sidings (10
year extension of federal fund top up of 3 B)
46RAIL CAN DO MORE INNOVATION
- Attracting, training and retaining a skilled work
force is critical - Rail human resources study indicates retirement
rate likely to double will necessitate increased
training requirements/funding - Through IRT, colleges will increase the number of
rail-specific programs in targeted occupations - However, other issues (non H.R.) also important
as productivity growth in transportation (a key
service sector) has multiplier effect on economy - Rail productivity performance to date has been
impressive which is a sign of innovation
success, but more to do - Tax policy, for example, needs to reward the
investment and risk taking necessary to drive
innovation
47TAX POLICY (CCA Rates)
TAX DEPRECIATION OF MAJOR TRANSPORTATION
INVESTMENTS, 2002
UNDEPRECIATED PORTION AFTER...
4 Years
4 Years
8 Years
8 Years
20 Years
20 Years
4 Years
4 Years
8 Years
8 Years
20 Years
20 Years
60
60
60
60
57
57
57
50
50
50
50
40
40
40
40
30
30
30
31
31
30
31
31
30
30
30
20
20
20
20
17
17
17
10
10
10
10
4
4
4
4
2
2
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CDN
CDN
CDN
CDN
CDN
CDN
CDN
CDN
CDN
CDN
CDN
CDN
U.S.
U.S.
U.S.
U.S.
CDN
CDN
CDN
CDN
CDN
CDN
CDN
U.S.
U.S.
U.S.
U.S.
CDN
CDN
trucks
trucks
rail
rail
rail
rail
rail
rail
rail
rail
rail
rail
rail
rail
trucks
trucks
trucks
trucks
rail
rail
rail
rail
rail
rail
rail
rail
trucks
trucks
marine
marine
The ability of rail to innovate is being reduced
by low CCA rates
48RAIL CAN DO MORE SMART REGULATION
- TC emphasis on setting the right framework
and leaving the running of business to industry - Use safety systems, not a prescriptive
approach (operations), that are performance
based and allow carriers to exercise
responsibility/ accountability - Non-regulatory initiatives need to be
encouraged (MOUs, joint studies, volunteer
partnerships) - Recent examples of new and successful
approaches - MOU security agreement with TC
- Proximity MOU with FCM
- Emissions MOU with EC
- Operation Lifesaver
- Dangerous goods process / clear language
- Radio spectrum management
49CONCLUSION
- Deregulation is providing desired results for
industry - NAFTA integration and harmonization imperatives
cant be ignored - Short line challenges mean investment is a
fundamental issue policy and regulatory
environment for all carriers must provide
business certainty
50CONCLUSION (contd.)
- Intermodal is rail industrys fastest growing
sector and key part of transportation future - Bottom Line rail can help governments reduce
public costs and address policy needs (including
improved border efficiency, reduced congestion
and meeting environmental goals)