ASSERTIVE MENTORING - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 8
About This Presentation
Title:

ASSERTIVE MENTORING

Description:

Progress returns (AOB) are made at the end of Term 1. ... these discussions from the usual departmental meetings held once per half term. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:358
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: sqla
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ASSERTIVE MENTORING


1
ASSERTIVE MENTORING
  • AM is a system that
  • Ensures every pupil is set aspirational targets
    for all subjects.
  • Provides for a rigorous yet simple system for
    tracking pupils progress.
  • Ensures that progress data is fed back to pupils
    quickly and directly.
  • Is rewards driven
  • Involves the senior leadership and ASTs in giving
    substantial time commitment.

2
WHY ARE WE DOING IT?
  • The potential benefits of mentoring are very
    clear. It has the ability to
  • Remove current underachievement (CVA measures)
  • Support all aspects of the pupils learning
  • Remove conflict that may occur between teachers
    and pupils
  • Act as a proactive measure given the schools
    changing demographics
  • The most direct benefit of mentoring however, is
    its ability when implemented effectively - to
    support pupils to achieve their maximum academic
    potential.

3
PROCESS KS4
  • Upper school
  • Targets are set at the start of Year 10
  • Year 10
  • Progress returns are made each month from January
    on an Above, On or Below target basis (AOB).
  • This data is reviewed by the AMT who liaise with
    HoDs and HoY/PAM in order to ensure that pupils
    causing concern are monitored. Some may be
    mentored if this is felt appropriate.
  • From May of Year 10 the year group begin the
    Assertive Mentoring programme.

4
PROCESS KS4
  • Year 11
  • Each subject teacher provides Projected Grade
    every month based upon current work and effort.
    This is broken into 2 grades Overall grade
    coursework grade. These grades are checked by
    the HoD.
  • Grades are reviewed for all pupils. Pupils who
    were previously identified as underachieving and
    pupils with 3 or more grades below target are
    then assertively mentored. Other pupils may be
    seen by the HoY/PAM or individual HoDs.
  • Mentors meet with mentees to address issues and
    monitor progress.

5
PROCESS KS4
  • This cycle continues from October until May. In
    addition to data return points, staff can also
    refer pupils who are raising concern at any time.
    These referrals will go to a specified mentor or
    in cases where mentoring is not in place, the
    referral will go to the HoY/PAM. They will then
    liaise with the AMT. The system will have
    capacity for adding these pupils if required.

6
PROCESS KS3
  • Targets are set at the start of Year 7 by the
    AMT. These targets are the end of Key Stage 3
    targets.
  • Teaching staff then set the end of year targets
    based upon this information. (Discussion may
    need to take place over targets set.)
  • Years 78
  • Progress returns (AOB) are made at the end of
    Terms 1 and 2.
  • This data is reviewed by the AMT and liaison with
    HoY takes place with a view to completing
    parental interviews where necessary.
  • Final achievement levels are collected at the end
    of Term 3. At this point targets may be reviewed
    for the following year (Up not Down).

7
PROCESS KS3
  • Year 9
  • Progress returns (AOB) are made at the end of
    Term 1.
  • This data is reviewed by the AMT and liaison with
    HoY takes place with a view to completing
    parental interviews where necessary.
  • In Term 2 projected levels are collected in
    January-April.
  • These levels are reviewed and pupils causing
    concern (as Year 11) are put onto the Assertive
    Mentoring Programme until after the SATs.

8
HOW WILL THIS IMPACT ON STAFF?
  • For all teaching staff
  • Increased requirement to provide data on pupils
  • Additional meeting time but with a focussed
    agenda
  • Removal of confrontation with pupils who dont do
    work required
  • Removal of data analysis pressures
  • Teacher and pupil relationships are enhanced
  • Rigour in the process gives pupils no way out
  • Teachers focus remains in the classroom
  • For HoDs
  • Greater focus on monitoring pupils causing
    concern within their area.
  • The additional data meetings will enable a clear
    focus on progress within departments and as such
    should remove these discussions from the usual
    departmental meetings held once per half term.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com