Professional Development for Early Childhood Educators - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 44
About This Presentation
Title:

Professional Development for Early Childhood Educators

Description:

Mentor in basic skills (intellectual and social-emotional) Celebrate developmental advances (reward behavior) Rehearse and extend new skills ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:260
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: justi81
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Professional Development for Early Childhood Educators


1
Professional Development for Early Childhood
Educators
  • Evidence to support strategic investments that
    improve childrens early literacy and language
    development
  • Craig T. Ramey, Ph.D.
  • Sharon Landesman Ramey, Ph.D.
  • Directors, Georgetown University
  • Center on Health and Education

2
The big picture for understanding how to
promote children's well-being
3
Seven Essential Transactions forParents and
Teachers of Young Children
  • Encourage exploration with all senses (active
    learning)
  • Mentor in basic skills (intellectual and
    social-emotional)
  • Celebrate developmental advances (reward
    behavior)
  • Rehearse and extend new skills
  • Protect from inappropriate disapproval,
  • teasing, and punishment
  • Communicate richly and responsively (oral and
    print)
  • Guide and limit behavior (preparing citizenship)

Ramey Ramey, 1999 Going to School
4
Effects of Mothers Speech on Infant Vocabulary
Huttenlocher et al, Developmental Psychology,
(1991)
5
Teacher speech in pre-K influences childrens
syntax growth(Huttenlocher, 2002)
  • For pre-K teachers who use proportionally more
    multi-clause sentences, their students show
    greater fall to spring gains in
  • comprehension of complex (multi-clause) sentences
  • use of noun phrases
  • This applies to children from all SES groups

6
Pre-K is ideal time to promote evidence-based
skills for successful reading induction
  • Oral Language Comprehension
  • Oral Language Expressiveness
  • Phonological Awareness
  • Letter Name Knowledge
  • Concepts about Print

Neuman Dickinson, Handbook of Early Literacy
Research, 2006
7
Consequences of very low resource environments on
childrens school entry skills and later
performance
  • Delays of 1 to 2.5 years in overall academic and
    intellectual competence
  • Marked reduction in vocabulary as well as
    expressive and receptive language skills
  • Fewer skills in interacting with teachers and
    peers in a learning environment
  • Lack of supportive learning at home and in summer
    further increases the gap over the first 4
    years in school

8
  • The Abecedarian (ABC) Project is a randomized
    controlled trial (RCTs) that proved high quality,
  • early childhood education can alter the life
    course of high-risk children and their families.
  • The ABC findings have been affirmed in 9 other
    RCTs involving more than 1000 children.

  • Ramey
    Ramey, 2006

9
Pre-K Educational Treatment prevents decline in
childrens low-IQ classification ( with IQs lt85)
Martin, Ramey, Ramey, 1990 American Journal of
Public Health
10
McCarthy Language scores are significantly higher
for children in the ABC group (national norm
50)
Ramey Campbell, 1979 American Journal of Mental
Deficiency
11
Reading achievement scores are significantly
higher for ABC children at 8, 12, 15, 21yrs
Campbell Ramey, 2001 Developmental Psychology
12
ABC educational program reduced grade repetition
and special education placement
Ramey Ramey, 1999 MR/DD Research Review
13
Key Findings from Abecedarian Project(Abecedaria
n one who learnsthe basics such as the
alphabet)
  • 18 Months to 21 Years Old
  • Intelligence (IQ)
  • Reading and math skills
  • Academic locus-of-control
  • Social Competence
  • Years in school,
  • including college
  • Full-time employment
  • Grade Repetition
  • Special Education
  • placement
  • Teen Pregnancies
  • Smoking and drug
  • use
  • Teen depression

Plus benefits to mothers of these children
(education, employment)
Ramey et al, 2000
14
Why Some Well-Intended Preschool ProgramsHave
Failed to Close the Achievement Gap
  • Teachers not well prepared or supported
  • in classrooms
  • Dosage of pre-K is too low
  • Inadequate instruction to promote cognitive,
    language,
  • early literacy, and early math skills
  • Ineffective communication with and engagement of
  • parents and other key service providers
  • Instruction is too harsh or rigid

15
How to implement effective early childhood
educational programs
  • Commit to knowledge application (put scientific
    findings in action daily)
  • Plan and collect practically useful information
    longitudinally (document, assist, and reward
    desired performance)
  • Understand the importance of systems that impinge
    on classroom environment (engage key players to
    increase likelihood of sustainable success)

16
The KAIS Theory of PD (Ramey Ramey, 2007)
17
Recent findings from Maryland and Louisiana Pre-K
initiatives
  • Strong visionary leadership and commitment to
    pre-K as a means of improving student achievement
    and closing the gap for children of poverty
  • Willingness to conduct research that will provide
    timely information to inform changes in the
    classroom practices and policy
  • The programs differ in ways that provide insights
    about benefits of full-day vs half-day pre-K and
    differential risk
  • New findings about impact of in-classroom coaching

18
Similarities in MD and LA Pre-K programs
  • Implemented by public schools
  • Certified early childhood teachers (full
    benefits, comparable salaries to other teachers)
  • Classroom sizes of no more than 20
  • Adult to child ratio of no more than 1 to 10
  • Specified pre-K curriculum in resource-rich
    classrooms and high standards
  • Ongoing professional development
  • Strong focus on language and early literacy

19
Differences in MD and LA Pre-K
  • MCPS Pre-K classrooms are half-day while LA
    classrooms are full-day
  • Children in LA4 start at slightly lower levels
    than do children in MCPS
  • MCPS classrooms serve more diverse children in
    terms of nationality and language backgrounds
  • LA4 is not limited to at risk students, while
    MCPS currently is

20
The MD and LA Partnership Paradigm for studying
educational initiatives and testing promising
interventions
  • Involves the leadership of school districts
    and/or state boards plus major research
    universities creating long-term working
    partnerships
  • Partnership promotes sustained efforts to (1)
    study, (2) improve, and (3) maintain high
    quality programs that will benefit children and
    schools
  • Partnership is more than 1 study, 1 issue
  • Partnership recognizes the different cultures,
    needs, and contributions from science, practice,
    and policy
  • see Ramey Ramey (1990, 2006)

21
Purpose of the Georgetown U-MCPSIES Curriculum
Coaching Study
  • To conduct rigorous evaluation of an
    evidence-based early literacy curriculum
    Scholastics Building Language for Learning (BLL)
    (Neuman Snow)
  • To evaluate effects of amount of professional
    development (in the form of summer institute,
    job-embedded coaching, and peer exchange
    sessions) on classroom implementation and
    children's achievement

22
Design of the Georgetown U-MCPSIES Curriculum
Coaching Study
  • 24 randomly selected classrooms then randomly
    assigned to
  • BLL Curriculum Coaching (weekly vs monthly)
  • MCPC Comparison condition
  • Classrooms assessed on ELLCO and BLL Fidelity
    Checklist
  • Total of 263 children assessed in both fall and
    spring using TERA, Concepts of Print, Get it, Got
    It Go and What I Think of School

23
BLL Implementation Scores by Coaching Conditions
24
Mean ELLCO Scores by Coaching Conditions
25
Fall and Spring TERA by Coaching Conditions
26
LA4 Study Design Population-based, Cohort
Sequential, Case/Control Longitudinal Study
  • Pilot year (Jan May 2002) n1358
  • Cohort 1 (2002-2003) n3711
  • Cohort 2 (2003-2004) n4767
  • Cohort 3 (2004-2005) n4665
  • Cohort 4 (2005-2006) n7998
  • Cohort 5 (2006-2007) ngt10,000
  • Note LA legislature has committed 82 million
    for 2007-2008 school year (representing a
    substantial expansion of program that the School
    Board and Legislature have monitored closely)

27
LA4 results Consistent, replicated pattern of
findings for
  • Fall to spring scores increased during Pre-K
  • Grade retention rates reduced in public school
  • Special Education placement rates lowered
  • Academic achievement scores raised at end of 3rd
    grade (high stakes testing)

28
ECERS Ratings of LA4 Classrooms shows
exceptionally high quality for all cohorts
(highest possible score 7.0)
  • Cohort 1 M 5.7
  • Cohort 2 M 6.0
  • Cohort 3 M 6.0
  • Cohort 4 M 5.9
  • Note these compare favorably to ECERS scores
    from other studies of large-scale pre-K classrooms

29
Developmental Skills Checklist (DSC) used to
measure fall and spring student performance
  • Language, Print, and Math subscales
  • Benefits appeared for boys and girls African
    American and White children and children from
    different family backgrounds (family income,
    parental education)
  • Benefits larger for children at greater risk
    based on family factors than for lower risk
    children

30
(No Transcript)
31
(No Transcript)
32
(No Transcript)
33
Louisiana Kindergarten Retention Rates (2003-04
Cohort)
34
Louisiana Kindergarten Retention Rates (2004-05
Cohort)
35
LA4 reduces grade retention rates for
  • Both boys and girls
  • African American and White children
  • Continues with strong benefits into 1st, 2nd, and
    3rd grade (but awaiting replication before formal
    presentation of results)
  • Benefits larger for Free and Reduced Meals
    children (lower income families) than for general
    population

36
Louisiana Special Education Placement Rates
(2003-04 Cohort)
37
Louisiana Special Education Placement Rates
(2004-05 Cohort)
38
LA4 reduces special education placement for
  • Both boys and girls
  • African American and White children
  • Greater benefits for children receiving free and
    reduced meals compared to general population,
    although both groups benefit
  • Continued lower special education placement
    through 2nd grade (latest year studied to date)

39
iLEAP Achievement -3rd grade
Percentage of Students at Basic and Above
40
iLEAP ELA Students (Pilot and Cohort 1)
Percentage of FRL Students at the
Unsatisfactory Achievement Level
n 8,192 n 556
n5,391 n1,875 Z 8.74,
Plt0.001
Z 10.39, Plt0.001
Fewer students in LA 4 scored at the
Unsatisfactory achievement level on the third
grade ELA iLEAP when compared to students who had
no public Prekindergarten.
41
A Comparison of Childrens Academic Progress in
Pre-K Programs that differ in dosage
42
Cross-study comparison reveals
  • Large-scale state public pre-K programs can offer
    high quality instructional classroom environments
  • Children show significant gains in their school
    readiness and academic achievement -- with
    larger benefits for children at higher risk
  • Program dosage (half vs full year and half vs
    full day) makes significant difference about
    twice the benefits from twice the dose
  • In-classroom coaching in evidence-based
    curriculum can drive up implementation fidelity
    plus children's early literacy development even
    for highly qualified teachers (e.g., Masters
    degree in early childhood education)

43
Principles of effective early educational
interventions
  • Timing of intervention
  • Dosage (amount) of overall intervention
  • Instructional focus on academic, cognitive, and
    language domains
  • Individual differences in responsivity
  • Continuity of supports

  • Ramey Ramey (2006)

44
For copies of this powerpoint presentation
  • Contact Drs. Craig and Sharon Ramey
  • Georgetown University Center on Health and
    Education
  • 202-687-2874
  • ctr5_at_georgetown.edu
  • sr222_at_georgetown.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com