Title: Small Group Communication
1Welcome!
- Small Group Communication
- Ellen Waddell
- Instructor
2AGENDA
- Leadership
- Leadership Styles The good, the bad, and the
ugly! - Leadership exercise
- The importance of using an effective leadership
style - Theories concerning leadership skills
3- The successful organization has one major
attribute that sets it apart from unsuccessful
organizations dynamic and effective
leadership. -
P. Hersey and K.
Blanchard
4Management vs. Leadership
- Management
- focused on the control of existing
operations/functions - Leadership
- more strategic and visionary
- The primary roleguidance
- strategically defined goals and objectives.
5Traits of Leaders
- Think of examples of excellent leaders
- What characteristics are essential for effective
leadership? - What behaviors demonstrate leadership ability?
- How many of these behaviors require communication
skills? - Who in history, or now living, exemplifies the
true leader?
6Leadership Defined
- Leaders
- emerge naturally
- appointed/hired
- Leadership is the ability to influence others,
either positively or negatively. - Positivetask accomplishment by a group, or team.
- Negativetask accomplishment is inhibited.
7Key Role for the Leader
- Key role?
- Setting the context
- Incorporation of strategic goals and objectives
daily work/activities.
8Group Exercise
- Split into four equal teams
- The team process is important to this exercise,
so everyone must participate. - Follow the instructions of your leader carefully.
- Using the provided Tinker Toy sets, your team
will have five minutes to build something that
worksdoes somethinghas a purpose.
9Leadership Exercise
- What happened in your groups?
- Was the leadership effective?
- Why/Why not?
- What characteristics did the leader of your group
display? - What would have worked better?
- How did the leadership style impact the end
result?
10Leadership styles are critical to the process of
team building and positive results.
- Empowered leaders use appropriate styles of
leadership - Leadership causes results
11Leadership Styles
- Autocratic/controller
- Laissez-faire
- Democratic leadership
- Type X The Performer
- Type Y The Transformer
- Task vs. Maintenance
12Autocratic/Controller Leader
- ALL Controlling Dictator
- end result is made predictable.
- Individual team member assignments
limited/specific in nature - Team needs are secondary.
- Responsibility is not shared.
- Decisions are made by the leader only.
- Motivation is through fear or intimidation
- Highly productive team
- BUT when leader is away, no work occurs
- Sabotage probable
- Aggressive, or apathetic members likely
- Generals/Admirals in the armed forces must be
controllers to win wars - Size of group might require this leadership style
13Laissez-faire Leader
- Group has freedom to do as they please
- No News is Good News
- Dont bother me and I wont bother you
- Nonparticipation of leader
- Leader makes infrequent, spontaneous comments on
member activities - Unless questioned, makes no attempt to appraise
or regulate course of events - Hallway delegation
- Teams report less satisfaction
- with the leader/group as a whole
- what is produced as a result of their work
14Does Leadership Style Really Make a Difference?
- Superman-style outdated
- Team decisions
- collectively made
- Over-all good of organization
15Democratic Leader
- Democratic process
- all participants have equal voice.
- Information is freely shared.
- Authority is delegated
- Responsibility is shared by all members
- Complex Individual team assignments
- Feelings of contribution to the team goal prevail
- When the leader is away, work continues to occur.
- Best in small group situation
- collaborative work vs. time available
- Teams report more satisfaction
- process and task
- functional and positive team work
16Leadership Styles
Type X - The Performer a transactional
leader Type Y - The Transformer a risk taker
17Type X Leader
- A leader who does not trust team members to work
and is unconcerned with the personal achievement
of team members. - Does ALL of the work because no one else can do
it as fast, or as well as him/her - No confidence in the ability of the group. Only
concerned with their own grade, or evaluation and
not willing to have that compromised by group
failure to perform. The group lacks confidence,
since the leader communicates to them their lack
of ability to perform up to standard. - Reactive leadership that often responds to
problems in a punitive manner - Emergency situations require performers
18Type Y Leader
- A leader who displays trust in team members and
is concerned with their sense of personal
achievement. - Transformational leaders
- are more of a risk taker
- more trusting of the group, and are concerned
with each persons personal achievement - Proactive-not reactive
- Charismatic leadership that inspires exceptional
performance
19Theories of Leadership
- Trait theory leaders are people who were born
to lead - Special built-in, identifiable leadership traits
- Functional theory several group members should
be ready - Any task or maintenance activity can be
considered leadership
20Situational Leadership
- Leadership is situation dependent.
- Leadership style dependent upon the needs
- Team
- Individual
- Particular problem.
- Can be affected by
- the nature of the problem
- social climate
- personalities of group members
- size of the group
- time available to accomplish the task
21Situational Leadership
- Adaptive leadership style
- Accurate assessment of situation
- react appropriately.
- Styles employed
- Type Y
- Autocratic/controller
- Laissez-faire
- Democratic
22Circle of Management/Leadership
23Leadership Exercises
- Next
- defining the difference
- leadership and authority
- technical and adaptive work.
24Welcome!
- Small Group Communication
- Ellen Waddell
- Instructor
25AGENDA
- Leadership (continued)
- Authority
- Trust
- Task vs. Maintenance Leadership
- Status
- Power Bases
26Authority
- A degree of power and influence over others
- goals and objectives
- The proper use of authority
- adapting to situation
- decisions need know-how
- beyond technical knowledge
- wisdom to adapt
27Respect and Trust
- Respect and trust are byproducts of the type of
leader you are, and how you treat those around
you. - Respect and trust are not the result of the
dictatorship you use to command respect from
those who work for you. - Dr. Phil
28Authority and Trust
- The proper use of authority requires
- Consistency
- Congruity walking the talk
- Reliability
- Integrity
29Eastern Philosophy of Leadership
- The wicked leader is he who the people despise.
- The good leader is he who the people revere.
- The great leader is he who the people say We did
it ourselves.!
30Small Group LeadershipTask vs. Maintenance
- What should the role of the leader be in the
small group model 3-12 people? - How does that differ from a leader of a large
organization, military, a state, or nation?
31Task Leadership
- Keep the members on-task.
- Initiating Generating ideas to solve problems
- Coordinating Exploring the contributions of
each member and the value of those contributions
to the whole. - Summarizing The ability to make long
explanations precise, and reduce group
uncertainty concerning the problem and its
solution. - Elaborating Exploring ideas that are presented
to their fullest. -
32 Maintenance Leadership
- Tension release Knowing when to work, and when
to take a break - Gate keeping Coordinating the discussion to
ensure all members can express their views. - Encouraging Recognizing individual
contributions - Mediating Managing conflict and keeping it
issue oriented, rather than person-oriented. -
-
33Status
- Status is an individuals importance to the
group - High Status
- Low Status
- Status Achievers
- Status Seekers
34Status
- Status is an individuals importance to the
group - High Status
- Low Status
- Status Achievers
- Status Seekers
35High Status
- Shown more deference
- Are listened to more often
- Asked for advice more often
- Rewarded with greater share of goods
- Bigger car/office/salary
- Receive more recognition for contributions
- High Status group members talk more often to
other high status members/total group - Are more likely to have a leadership role-person
with the highest status is usually the leader - Have more influence on the process than low
status members
36Low Status
- Direct conversation to high status, not low
status group members. - Communicate more positive messages to high status
members - More likely to complain about the task they have
been assigned (victim mentality) - Are more likely to have comments ignored
- Communicate more irrelevant information
37Power Bases
- Legitimate Power
- Those elected/chosen
- Referent Power
- Those we allow to have power because we admire
them - Expert Power
- Those with knowledge/experience
- Reward Power
- Those able to reward others performance (grades)
- Coercive Power
- Those able to use threats/blackmail
38Trust
- Trust must be earned
- Trust develops when you can predict how another
will behave under certain circumstances-and they
do as expected - Trust is always a gamble
- Previous experiences will influence how your
ability to trust
39Self Disclosure
- The deliberate communication of information about
yourself to others. - Should be appropriate for the time, setting and
people in the group - It is a function of an ongoing relationship
- It is reciprocal
40 41Welcome!
- Small Group Communication
- Ellen Waddell
- Instructor
42Individual Rights Responsibilities
- Agenda
- Cohesiveness
- Style Dimensions
- Hierarchy of Human Needs
43Cohesiveness
- The degree of attraction members feel toward one
another and their group - Communication styles directly impact the
cohesiveness of a group - Those who report the least amount of pleasure
with the cohesiveness of their group are most
likely to be those who display verbal
aggressiveness during group work.
44 Small Group Model
(Beebe, p. 47-48)
- ROLES
- Task helps accomplish the groups goal
- Maintenance defines the groups social
atmosphere - Example A member who works to create a
harmonic, peaceful atmosphere is performing
maintenance on the group - Individual contribution of individual toward
group goal - -can be counter productive to group goals.
Some one who is more interested in what they can
get out of the group process, than what they can
contribute.
45Group vs. Individual Rights
46Individual Rights
- To be the judge of your own behavior
- To express you beliefs and feelings
- To ask for respect
- To give self credit
- To change your mind with more information
- To make mistakes
- To offer no justification
- To offer no justification
- To be disliked
- To decide not to be assertive
- To say, I dont know I dont understand
No - I dont care.
- To decide not to be assertive
- To be disliked
47Individual Responsibilities
- To allow others different opinions
- To be constructive
- To give respect
- To give others credit
- To be sensitive to others
- To listen to others
- To explain changes to people who are affected by
the change - To allow others to make mistakes
- To deal with the consequences of your behavior
- To be flexible
48Maslows Hierarchy of Needs
- Self Actualization Living life to its fullest.
Function as autonomous beings - Esteem Need The need for respect or esteem from
self, or others - Belongingness Need The need to be a part of a
group - Survival Needs Physiological/Safety
49We are needy people!
- How does Mazlows theory apply to small group
work?
50 51Welcome!
- Small Group Communication
- Ellen Waddell
- Instructor
52Communication Conflict Styles
- Agenda
- Conflict Styles Quiz
- Conflict Styles Discussion
53Communication Conflict Styles
Closed
Hidden Avoidance/Withdrawal
Accommodation
Smoothing
Compromising
(any
style) Blind
Open Competition
Collaborative/
Problem Solving
54Closed Style
- Task focused
- Productive as long as they can work in an
environment free of interpersonal demands - Need security and a prescriptive guidance.
-
- How do you communicate with such a person?
-
- Very carefully
- Ensure a safe working environment
- Fully explain all the rules and the chain
of command. - Dont ask about personal issues
- Dont have high expectations of
participation in meetings
55Blind Style
- Task focused
- Know what they want.
- Well-organized and not afraid to exercise
authority to get what they want. - Very demanding and insist that their way is the
best. - Punitive with the failure of others.
- Views personal goals as more important than
group goals. - Conflict is a win lose situation-a contest where
someone has to lose for another to win. - Has great respect for power and authority
-
- How do you communicate with such a person?
- Follow through with what you state you will
accomplish - Follow chain of command
- Dont expect interpersonal connection
- Dont keep them waiting
56Hidden Style
- Process/Relational focus
- Fun to be around
- Good listeners with good interpersonal skills
- Unable to give opinions or ideas
- Are often distrustful of meanings
- Views conflict as destructive
- Believes harmony is important at all times and
works to smooth over conflicts -
-
-
-
-
- How do you communicate with such a person?
- Dont expect full disclosure
- Motivate them with public praise and
social standing - Share information and listen carefully
- Keep your opinions to a minimum
- Realize these people have learned how to
act open - Expect your comments to be searched for
double meanings -
57Open Style
- Task and Process focused
- Flexible with the needs of a group, or individual
- Able to collaborate and accepting of other
communication styles - Can accept constructive criticism.
- Easily discloses personal information
- Less impressed with the show and more impressed
with factual information - Can be seen as ineffective by Blind group members
who want results in a more timely manner - (How do you communicate with them? ?)
58Open Style
- So, how do you communicate with such a person?
-
- Be honest and open, but use tact
- Look at all sides of the problem
- Share/disclose personal information
- Accept shared responsibility
- Give constructive criticism
- Avoid being pushy or manipulative
- Treat them as equals
59Compromise vs. Collaboration
- Compromise
- Takes the middle of the road approach to solving
problems. - Believes that a high quality solution is not as
important as an agreeable solution and the
feelings of all involved - Willing to sacrifice something important to reach
a compromise - Compromise is the second choice
- Compromise can be inappropriate when the outcome
is a lose-lose or the best solution is not reached
- Collaboration
- Gives equal consideration for others and self
- Highly values cooperation and assertiveness
- Guides group through basic problem solving
procedure - Tries to get consensus and willing to spend time
to obtain consensus -
- Good when there are common goals that require
everyones cooperation -
- BUT Takes times and requires a shared value
system.
60Group Think
- A type of thought exhibited by group members
who try to minimize group conflict and reach
consensus without critically testing, analyzing,
and evaluating ideas
61Handling Group Conflict How to Disagree Without
Becoming Disagreeable
- Define conflict and explain how you feel when
involved in a group conflict - Define groupthink and explain its consequences
- Distinguish between competitive and cooperative
conflict orientations - Identify how to use the conflict grid and the
benefits and problems that can result from
effective and ineffective handling of group
conflict - Identify behaviors that can be used to resolve
conflicts effectively
62Conflict
- Conflict means different things to different
people - Conflict is not necessarily bad, just different
- Conflict is, disagreement over available options
caused by seemingly incompatible goals among
group members and their thinking that others can
keep them from achieving their goals (p. 373).
"In the middle of difficulty lies
opportunity." - Albert
Einstein
63Resolving Conflicts
- Cooperative vs. Competitive Conflict
- Cooperative willingness to share rewards to
resolve conflicts - Seek mutually beneficial way to resolve
disagreement - Win-win situation
- Competitive all-or-nothing must defeat other
participants - See winning as a test of personal worth
- Win-lose situation
- Transform conflict from competitive to
cooperative - Effective communication techniques
- Role reversal
64Productive vs. Destructive Results
- Productive all participants are satisfied and
believe they have gained something - Cooperative problem-solving methods
- Willingness to trust each other
- Destructive all participants are dissatisfied
and believe they have lost something - Win-lose encounters characterized by
misconceptions and misperceptions inaccurate,
sketchy, and disruptive communication - Hesitancy to trust each other
65Welcome!
- Small Group Communication
- Ellen Waddell
- Instructor
66Agenda
- Persuasion and the Worldview
- Problem solving and decision making
- Good and bad
67PROBLEM SOLVING
- The process of overcoming obstacles to achieve a
goal - Obstacles something in the way or in opposition
to goal - Goal the end towards which effort is directed
(Webster's)
68PROBLEM SOLVING
- Requires
- Identification of existing undesirable situation
- Goal which group needs to achieve
- Obstacles preventing achievement of goal
69PROBLEM SOLVING
- 3 approaches
- Descriptive
- Functional
- Prescriptive
70ARISTOTLES THREE PERSUASIVE PROOFS
- ETHOS Speaker Credibility
- Competence
- Goodwill
- Character
- LOGOS Logical Appeal/Reasoning
- Drawing conclusions from evidence
- Inductive vs. Deductive
- PATHOS Emotional Appeal
- Appeals to the listeners needs, wants, desires,
etc. -
71Habits that Hinder ThinkingEthical Reasoning
vs. Reasoning Fallacies
- Ethical speakers do not use reasoning fallacies
- Argumentum ad Hominem old fashion name calling,
or an attack on the person and not the issue in
question - Red Herring using an irrelevant issue or
distraction to divert the focus to another issue
(think of a BAD smell) - False Division/Dichotomy Polarization of
options, when in reality there exists many
options of choice. - Post Hoc (False Cause) Identification of an
issue as the cause of another problem, when there
is not relationship - Argumentum ad Populum (bandwagon) But,
everyone is doing it! An appeal to popular
opinion - Argumentum ad Verecudiam Appeal to authority,
or the testimony of someone who is not a true
expert
72Speaking Persuasively
- Attitude A learned predisposition
- response favorable/unfavorable
- Our likes and dislikes change easily
- Our beliefs or values harder to change.
- Belief The degree of confidence
- Perception of true or false.
- highly central a beliefs hard to change
- Value An enduring conception of right or wrong,
good or bad. - least likely to change over time.
73The Worldview
- Beliefs reflect worldview
- Beliefsbuilding blocks of attitudes
- Attitudes visible through behavior
FINAL EXAM TOPIC
74How DO You Know What You Know?
- Epistemology
- How we learn
- Develop our breath and depth of knowledge
- Beliefs, attitudes, and values
- Diversity of experiences
- Family
- Religion
- Education
- Socioeconomics
- Culture
75Worldview vs. Evidence
- Exact same evidence 2 different conclusions
- It is not the evidence you mentioned or the
logic used to consider the validity and value of
that evidence, but the conclusions drawn from
that information that I find wrong - Internal noise can hinder the listener
- Agreement/disagreement w/ worldview
- Perception vs. Truth
76Worldview and Small Group Communication
- Small groups are impacted by and impact the
interaction of group members - Group Discussion How would the worldview of the
following members play out in a discussion of
religious beliefs? - Lupe Female, 46, married with 3 children,
Hispanic, Catholic - Tom Male, 34, unmarried, no children,
Caucasian, Jewish - Joe Male, 22, unmarried, 1 child, Caucasian,
Atheist - Cindy Female, 29, married, 2 children, African
American, Evangelical Christian - Mei Female, 39, divorced, 4 children, Chinese,
Agnostic - Sandy Female, 18, single, no children,
Christian - Ahmed Male, 26, single, no children, Muslim
77Worldview and Small Group Communication
- How did the worldview of the group members in the
scenario impact the process and discussion? - Climate
- confirming/disconfirming messages
- Nonverbal communication
- Individual rights/responsibilities
- ? How was the worldview in your group expressed
when talking about the scenario?
78Welcome!
- Small Group
- Communication
- Ellen Waddell
- Instructor
- THE LAST LECTURE!!!!
79GROUP THINK
- Agenda
- Define group think
- Example NASA
80Group Think
- A type of thought exhibited by group members who
try to minimize conflict and reach consensus
without critically testing, analyzing, and
evaluating ideas. - Groups need for unanimity overrides individual
member motivation to realistically appraise
alternative courses of action
81- Group think occurs when
- Critical thinking is not encouraged or rewarded
- Members believe that their group can do no wrong
(arrogance) - Members are too concerned about justifying their
actions - Members often believe that they have reached a
true consensus - Members are too concerned about reinforcing the
leaders beliefs
82- Group think occurs when
- Desire for consensus overrides analysis
- Group feels secure
- Rationalization of decision
- Groups morality
- Us vs. Them
- Members censor comments
- Direct pressure to dissenting members
- Gate keeper of disturbing outside ideas or
opinions - Can be related to paradigm shift resistance
- Silence consensus
83What does it like? Symptoms of Group
think
- Incomplete survey of alternatives
- Incomplete survey of objectives
- Failure to examine risks of preferred choice
- Poor information search
- Selective bias in processing information at hand
- Failure to reappraise alternatives
- Failure to work out contingency plans
84Challenger Columbia Explosions
85Organizational Culture
- Shared assumptions, values, beliefs, language,
symbols, and meaning systems that hold the
organization together. - Patterns of sustained communicative acts or
behaviors - Cultures develop over time
- Cultures are VERY difficult to change
- Requires drastic measures to make impact on
organizational culture
86NASAs Environment
- Shuttle as a bus
- Lack of funds
- Cancelled flights
- Communication between NASA and Morton-Thiokol
87- Shuttle operation
- Lack of escape pods
- Maintenance
88- How O rings work
- Need for a flexible rocket
- Failure rate
89How Cold is Cold
- Ice only in the shade or everywhere?
- Who is responsible?
90How is the decision made?
- NASA tele- conference
- Morton off line
91Group Think in Action
92Group Think
- A type of thought exhibited by group members who
try to minimize conflict and reach consensus
without critically testing, analyzing, and
evaluating ideas. - Groups need for unanimity overrides individual
member motivation to realistically appraise
alternative courses of action
93Suggestions to Reduce Group Think
- Gatekeeper should encourage critical, independent
thinking - Group members should be sensitive to status
differences that may affect decision making - Invite an outsider to the group to evaluate the
groups decision-making process - Assign a group member the role of devils
advocate - Ask group members to subdivide into smaller
groups (or work individually) and to consider
potential problems with the suggested solutions
94End of Presentation