Title: A Century of Work and Leisure
1A Century of Work and Leisure
- by
- Valerie A. Rameyand
- Neville Francis
2Has Leisure Increased Over the Last Century?
- Keynes (1930)
- Economic Possibilities for Our Grandchildren
- Lebergott (1993), Greenwood Vandebroucke
(2005) leisure has increased dramatically over
the last century - Prescott (1986) and DGE models
- No secular trends in leisure
3 Annual Hours Worked Per Worker in the
U.S. (Maddisons data)
4Annual Hours Worked in Business (Divided by
Civilian Non-Institutional Population Ages 16)
5New Measures of Leisure Per Capita
- New measure of per capita
- Entire population
- Comprehensive measure of non-leisure time
- - Work-for-pay hours
- - School hours
- - Home production hours
6How Should We Measure Per Capita?
7Standard Measure of Per Capita
- Civilian non-institutional population
- total non-institutional
population ages 16 and over - armed forces.
- Justification?
- Notion of available workforce
8Why Not Use Total Population?
Theoretical Basis Standard model with explicit
population growth Choose consumption ct and
leisure lt to maximize
where Nt is total population
Empirical Basis The consumption of children is
counted in c. Why dont we count their leisure
in l?
9Importance of Accounting for Children
- Consider a model with perfect substitutability of
consumption and leisure of adults and children in
household utility. - Let
- c1 per capita consumption by children,
c2 per capita consumption by adults - h1 per capita hours worked by children,
h2 per capita hours worked by adults - ? fraction of population that is children
- The representative household maximizes
- subject to
- and h1, h2, c1, c2 ? 0.
- If w1 lt w2, then it is optimal to set h1 0 and
- Increase in the fraction of children leads to an
increase in h2, hours per capita of adults. - Thus, adult time use is affected by the presence
of dependents with lower productivity.
10Population Ages 0-15 as a Fraction of Total
Population
11Population Ages 65 as a Fraction of Total
Population
12Comprehensive Measures ofNon-Leisure Time
- Work for pay (including government)
-
- Commuting time
- School Hours
-
- Home Production
-
13What is Leisure?
- Hawrylshyn (1971) distinguishes leisure from
household work by defining household work
activities as those economic services produced
in the household and outside the market, but
which could be produced by a third person hired
on the market without changing the utility to
members of the household.
14Ratings of Activity Enjoyment 1985 (From
Robinson and Godbey Appendix O)
15Accounting for Hours Worked for Pay
The standard RBC measure excludes hours worked in
government (civilian and military). Is that
important for trends?
16Government Hours as a Fraction of Total Work
Hours
17Measuring Total Hours
- Includes private hours (establishment,
self-employed, unpaid family workers) plus
government hours -
- Use Kendrick data for early period
-
- Use BLS private hours index upweighted by BEA
full-time equivalent employment numbers
18New Estimates of Annual Market Hours Per Worker
19Commuting Time
- Time diary estimates from 1965 2003 suggest
commute times are a relatively constant 10 of
hours worked. -
-
- Scant evidence early in the century
- - Average commute distances for shorter
- urban workers, farmers
- - But modes of urban transportation were slower
- - Hours per worker, days per week
-
- Rodrigue (2004) argues time spent commuting for
urban workers was relatively constant over 20th
Century -
- We assume commute time is 10 of hours worked for
entire century
20Accounting for Hours Spent in School
21School Enrollment Rates
22Estimating School Hours
- Annual school hours
- (enrollment in grades K 8 ) (avg. days
attended by enrollee) 5.5 hours - (enrollment in grades 9 - 12 ) (avg. days
attended by enrollee) 7 hours - (enrollment in college) (fraction
full-time) - 0.3 (fraction part-time) 165 days 8
hours
23Annual Per Capita Hours Spent on School for Ages
5-22
24Hours Spent in School as a Fraction of Total
Market Work
25Accounting for Hours Spent in Home Production
26Conventional Wisdom
- The diffusion of household utilities and
appliances dramatically reduced the hours spent
in household chores.
27Estimating Home Production Hours
- We use data from time diaries when possible,
since they are considered the most reliable
measure of both market work and home production
hours - Strategy
- gather time diary estimates by sex-age-employment
status cells - interpolate between years for each cell
- weight cell by fraction of population in that
cell.
28Estimates of Hours of Housework per Week by
Nonemployed Women Ages 18-64
29Are the Early Studies Representative?
- Samples were not nationally representative
- Urban samples tended to have above average income
- But most samples were rural, which had less
access to electricity, market goods, etc. - Evidence suggests that poor urban households did
not do more housework being poor meant being
dirty, relied on bakery bread. - Bryant (1996) adjusts for non-representativeness.
Our estimates are consistent with his.
30Why Didnt the Diffusion of AppliancesReduce
Housework?
- Appliances replaced low-wage immigrant labor
- Decline in maiden aunts
- of nonemployed women living in others house
with no children of own 18 in 1900, 7.6 in
1960. - Cross-section and time series studies on
appliances more appliances lead to more
household production output - Betty Friedan (1963) The Feminine Mystique
-
- Mokyr (2000) Revolution in sanitation, germ
theory of disease and nutrition theory increased
demand for cleanliness just as appliances were
diffusing
31Estimates of Housework by Employment Sex
Category (ages 18-64)
32Childrens Home Production
- Estimates from the 1920s are similar to those
from the 1980s - Ages 5-14 3 hours a week
- Ages 15-17 5 hours a week
33Average Weekly Hours of Housework of Adults
34Hours Per Capita in Various Activities
35Per Capita Market-Oriented Hours
36Measuring Leisure
- Time endowment is 24 hours per day, 365 days per
year - Most personal care time ranks high on enjoyment
index (sleeping, eating), so we do not subtract
it from leisure - Personal care time is relatively constant at 75
hours per week
37Annual Leisure Hours Per Capita
38Conclusions
- New measures suggest leisure per capita now is
about equal to leisure per capita in 1900 - Our results are different from the standard ones
because we track the leisure of the entire
population and we dont count schooling as
leisure. -
- Keynes prediction has not come true yet for the US